Category: economy

  • EUR/USD Faces Growing Pressure as Rising Oil Prices Deepen US-Eurozone Divide

    EUR/USD was trading near 1.1546 on March 12, extending a sharp three-day decline that has wiped out weeks of recovery efforts within just a few sessions. The pair reached a high of 1.2082 on January 27—its strongest level since June 2021—but has since formed a clear sequence of lower highs and lower lows, a classic signal of a sustained downtrend. From the January peak to current levels, the pair has fallen by roughly 536 pips, suggesting more than a simple correction. Instead, the shift points to a broader change in market dynamics: the dollar has regained control while the euro has moved firmly onto the defensive.

    The decline has been structured enough to resemble a steady trend, yet sharp reversals around key turning points have repeatedly caught bullish traders off guard. After the initial breakdown in late January, EUR/USD briefly stabilized around the 1.1700 region before rolling over again. The pair later touched a low near 1.1507, followed by a modest rebound that quickly lost momentum. That bounce failed to convincingly retake 1.1600, leaving the market once again testing the psychologically important 1.1500 level, a threshold closely monitored by technical analysts in recent weeks.

    A major catalyst behind this move has been the conflict involving Iran that erupted on February 28, which has widened the economic divergence between the United States and the Eurozone. The surge in energy prices has played a particularly significant role. Brent crude has climbed to around $97 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate is trading near $93.

    In response to the supply shock, the International Energy Agency authorized the release of more than 400 million barrels from strategic reserves, with the United States contributing over 172 million barrels. Even with these emergency measures, oil prices continued to rise, underscoring the severity of the supply disruption currently being priced into global energy markets.

    Iraq announced it would suspend port operations at key oil export terminals after two tankers were attacked in the Persian Gulf. As a result, the risk of disruption to the Strait of Hormuz is no longer theoretical—it is actively being priced into global energy markets.

    For Europe, the implications are particularly severe. Unlike the United States, the continent lacks sufficient domestic energy production to offset supply shocks. Its energy system has already been strained by the sharp reduction in Russian gas flows following the Russia–Ukraine War. Now, policymakers are confronting another potential surge in energy costs, with analysts warning that European inflation could climb above 3% in the coming months. Meanwhile, Iran has openly stated its goal of pushing oil prices toward $200 per barrel, leaving European economic planners with few credible short-term countermeasures.

    The situation looks very different for the United States. As the world’s largest oil producer, higher crude prices translate into stronger revenues for domestic energy companies. While rising oil prices complicate the Federal Reserve’s path toward monetary easing, they do not represent the kind of systemic import shock faced by Europe. In addition, the global oil trade is largely settled in U.S. dollars, meaning elevated energy prices tend to reinforce structural demand for the currency. The same oil shock that weighs on the euro therefore provides underlying support for the dollar. This imbalance lies at the heart of the current bearish outlook for EUR/USD and is unlikely to shift unless geopolitical tensions ease or Europe secures alternative energy supplies at scale—neither of which appears imminent.

    Recent inflation data has done little to alter this outlook. February headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.3% month-over-month and 2.4% year-over-year, while core CPI increased 0.2% on the month and 2.5% annually. The readings were not alarming, but they also failed to give markets a clear signal that the Federal Reserve is ready to pivot toward easier policy.

    The 2.5% core inflation rate, although near recent lows, remains above the Fed’s 2.0% target. More importantly, the forward-looking risks are intensifying. With crude oil trading near $97 per barrel and the conflict involving Iran showing little sign of resolution, higher energy costs are likely to filter through to consumer prices over the next two to three CPI releases, reinforcing concerns that inflation pressures could reaccelerate.

    The market’s expectations have shifted dramatically. Earlier in 2026, investors widely anticipated multiple Federal Reserve rate cuts during the first half of the year. That outlook has since been completely overturned. Futures markets now price in only a single 25-basis-point cut in September, meaning the first potential easing step would arrive nine months into the year—far later and far smaller than previously expected.

    This sharp repricing has provided strong support for the U.S. dollar. Elevated yields on U.S. Treasury securities relative to their European counterparts have widened the interest-rate differential that typically drives capital flows. As returns on dollar-denominated assets increase compared with euro assets, funds tend to move from EUR into USD holdings. When that spread widens, EUR/USD usually declines—and it has been expanding steadily since January.

    The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) is currently trading near 99.39, just below a key resistance level around 99.68, after touching a 15-week high of 99.70 earlier in the week. The index has now posted three consecutive sessions of gains, supported by rising oil prices and renewed safe-haven demand for the dollar.

    Technically, the outlook for the dollar remains constructive. DXY is trading comfortably above both its 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages, a configuration that typically signals underlying strength. Momentum indicators are also supportive: the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is climbing toward the 60–65 range, suggesting there is still room for further upside before conditions become overbought.

    From a technical perspective, the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement near 99.18 is acting as immediate support. Below that, the channel midpoint and the 0.382 Fibonacci level around 98.87 represent a deeper support zone. A confirmed break above 99.68 would likely open the door to a move toward 100.00 and potentially 100.32.

    If such a rally unfolds, it would likely intensify pressure on EUR/USD. Historically, each incremental advance in the dollar index toward the 100 level tends to translate into further compression in the euro pair, potentially pushing it toward 1.1450 and even 1.1391.

    In the near term, only two developments appear capable of interrupting the dollar’s upward momentum: a shift toward a more dovish tone from the Federal Reserve during its March 18 policy communication, or a sudden de-escalation in Middle East tensions that triggers a sharp decline in crude oil prices. Until one of those catalysts emerges, the macro and technical backdrop continues to favor dollar strength.

    EUR/USD broke below its 200-day Simple Moving Average (SMA) at 1.1672 on March 3, marking a key structural shift in the pair’s trend. Before that breakdown, the 200-day average had acted as a heavily contested level between buyers and sellers. Once the pair decisively moved below it, the level flipped into resistance—a classic technical reversal. Since then, every attempt to reclaim the 1.1672 area has failed. The pair’s earlier peak at 1.2082 on January 27 was followed by a steady decline that has carried EUR/USD down to its current levels.

    The 100-day SMA, located near 1.1696, is now flattening, a development that often precedes a bearish crossover with the 200-day average. Meanwhile, on shorter time frames, the 50-day EMA has already crossed below the 200-day EMA on the 2-hour chart, forming a Death Cross—a signal that reinforces the prevailing bearish bias among short-term traders. Price action remains below the 50-day EMA, which is now functioning as dynamic resistance during intraday rebounds.

    Momentum indicators also lean bearish. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) has fallen toward 33, approaching but not yet reaching the oversold threshold near 30. This suggests the pair still has room to move lower before a technical rebound becomes more likely.

    The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator remains below both its signal line and the zero level, confirming ongoing downward momentum. Although the histogram bars have begun to contract slightly—hinting at a potential slowdown in momentum—the broader directional bias remains negative.

    Finally, the Average Directional Index (ADX) sits near 29, indicating that the current downtrend is strengthening rather than fading. Since ADX measures the strength of a trend rather than its direction, this reading suggests that bearish momentum in EUR/USD is continuing to build.

    The 1.1500 level has become the immediate battleground for EUR/USD. This area aligns with Monday’s intraday low and represents one of the strongest psychological support levels on the chart. During Monday’s session, the pair briefly dipped to 1.1507 before staging a modest rebound. However, that bounce quickly faded and now appears to have been little more than a temporary dead-cat bounce, leaving the pair once again approaching the 1.1500 threshold, this time from a technically weaker position.

    A decisive daily close below 1.1500—not merely an intraday dip—would significantly shift the technical outlook. The next clear support lies at the November 5, 2025 low of 1.1468, followed closely by 1.1450. If selling momentum continues through those levels, attention would likely turn to the August 1, 2025 low at 1.1391, which becomes the next major downside target. From current levels, that would represent roughly a 155-pip decline, adding to a move that has already erased more than 500 pips since the January peak.

    On the upside, 1.1600 serves as the first hurdle bulls must reclaim before any meaningful recovery attempt can develop. Even then, the pair would still need to challenge the 200-day Simple Moving Average near 1.1672. Beyond that, 1.1700 stands as the critical structural level: a daily close above it would effectively undermine the current bearish framework and potentially open the door toward the 1.1800–1.1825 resistance zone.

    However, achieving such a recovery would likely require a significant shift in the macro backdrop—something that currently appears absent. In the meantime, the broader Fibonacci retracement band between 1.1644 and 1.1714 continues to act as a strong ceiling for any rallies, making upward progress difficult while leaving the downside path comparatively clearer.

    GBP/USD trading near 1.3378 and extending losses for a third straight session is not simply a U.K.-specific issue. Instead, it reinforces the idea that the dollar strength pushing EUR/USD lower reflects a broader, systemic move rather than a euro-only story. Sterling was rejected from the 1.3480–1.3500 resistance zone and has since reversed sharply, with price now sitting below both the 200-day EMA and the 50-day EMA, which have shifted from support to overhead resistance.

    Technically, the pair did form a modest higher low near 1.3280, but momentum indicators are weakening. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is rolling over around the mid-50 region, a pattern that often signals fading bullish momentum and can precede another leg lower. If GBP/USD breaks decisively below 1.3300, the next downside targets appear near 1.3215 and then 1.3150.

    For sterling to stage a more meaningful recovery, bulls would first need to reclaim 1.3480 and break above the descending trendline that has capped price action since late January. That trendline has remained intact since it formed, reinforcing the broader bearish structure. Until it is convincingly broken, rallies are likely to face selling pressure, while dips continue to look for the next support level below.

    The parallel weakness in GBP/USD alongside EUR/USD suggests that the current market dynamic is not limited to euro fundamentals. Instead, it reflects a broader U.S. dollar appreciation cycle, driven by rising energy prices, inflation concerns, and the repricing of expectations around Federal Reserve policy. Those forces are exerting pressure across major currency pairs simultaneously.

    Analysts at Deutsche Bank have noted that the European Central Bank is likely to maintain a cautious policy stance while inflation risks remain unresolved. Although this approach resembles the position of the Federal Reserve, the euro area faces a more fragile economic backdrop. Europe is more directly exposed to energy price shocks than the United States, relies more heavily on export demand that is weakening amid global trade uncertainty, and has less flexibility to sustain high interest rates given the debt burdens of several peripheral Eurozone sovereign economies.

    The Federal Reserve, with policy rates in the 3.50%–3.75% range, is operating from a position that remains relatively strong despite restrictive conditions. U.S. economic fundamentals continue to show resilience: GDP growth has remained positive, the labor market has held firm, and the domestic energy sector actually benefits from elevated oil prices.

    The situation is very different for the European Central Bank. The ECB must manage monetary policy for a 20-nation bloc, where consensus decision-making can slow policy responses. At the same time, Germany—the largest economy in the euro area—is dealing with an ongoing industrial slowdown. This leaves the ECB with less room to project a convincingly hawkish stance. As the yield spread between U.S. and European government bonds widens, capital continues to flow toward dollar-denominated assets. For EUR/USD to stage a meaningful recovery, either the ECB would need to raise rates or the Fed would need to cut—scenarios that appear unlikely over the next couple of months.

    The geopolitical backdrop has further complicated matters. When Iraq announced the closure of its oil export ports after tanker attacks in the Persian Gulf, it removed an important marginal supply source from an already tight energy market. In response, the International Energy Agency authorized the release of 400 million barrels from strategic reserves, including 172 million barrels from the United States. Yet oil prices continued climbing, signaling that traders believe the supply disruption linked to the Strait of Hormuz is more significant than emergency reserves can offset in the near term.

    Iran has openly discussed pushing crude prices toward $200 per barrel, a target that highlights the asymmetric risk facing global markets. Even if prices fall short of that level, the implications remain serious. At around $120 oil, European inflation could move above 3%, forcing the ECB to confront stagflation risks that would limit its ability to ease policy. If crude were to approach $150, energy-intensive industries in Europe could face severe demand destruction, threatening eurozone growth. In a scenario where oil reached $200, the strain on the European economy could be profound, potentially pushing EUR/USD toward levels not seen since the early 2000s. Importantly, the bearish outlook for the euro does not require such extreme outcomes—simply keeping oil above $90, which is already the case, maintains pressure on the currency.

    From a trading perspective, EUR/USD near 1.1546 remains vulnerable within a well-defined descending channel that began after the January 27 peak at 1.2082. The technical structure is reinforced by a sequence of lower highs and lower lows. Several key indicators now act as resistance: the 200-day SMA around 1.1672, the 50-day EMA, and the 100-day SMA near 1.1696. Meanwhile, the Average Directional Index (ADX) near 29 suggests the downtrend is strengthening rather than fading, while the RSI near 33 indicates there is still room for further downside before oversold conditions prompt a technical rebound.

    In this context, rallies toward the 1.1600–1.1640 resistance zone are likely to face selling pressure. The immediate technical pivot remains 1.1500. A decisive daily close below that level would expose further downside targets around 1.1446, followed by the November 2025 low near 1.1391.

    A bullish scenario would likely require a strong rejection from below 1.1500, ideally accompanied by a sharp reversal candle and increased trading volume, which could support a short-term rebound toward 1.1600. Outside of that narrow tactical setup, however, the broader picture remains bearish. With crude oil trading near $97, the U.S. Dollar Index hovering around 99.39, the Fed maintaining a steady policy stance, and the ECB constrained by weaker regional fundamentals, the macro environment currently offers little reason to expect a sustained EUR/USD recovery.

    Sources: Itai Smidt

  • Housing Market Navigates Turbulence as Iran Conflict and Tariffs Cloud Data

    The U.S. housing market is currently facing a pronounced imbalance between supply and demand. Housing starts have climbed to their highest level in a year, even as existing home inventory remains limited and home prices continue to face upward pressure.

    At the same time, new inflationary risks are emerging. A 15% global tariff and rising energy costs tied to the conflict in Iran threaten to weaken consumer purchasing power and potentially disrupt expectations for a housing market recovery in 2026.

    Ongoing inflation has also forced the Federal Reserve to maintain a defensive “higher for longer” interest-rate stance. Market expectations now suggest the first potential rate cut may not arrive until October 2026.

    This week, the U.S. housing sector has been in focus as a wave of economic data coincides with an important earnings release from homebuilder Lennar. Investors are closely monitoring the interaction between limited housing supply, evolving inflation pressures, and geopolitical developments that could reshape the economic outlook for 2026.

    The Inventory Challenge: Existing Home Sales and Construction Activity

    The week began with a reminder of the housing market’s supply-demand imbalance. On Tuesday, the National Association of Realtors reported that existing home sales for February rose 1.7% from January to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.09 million units. Although the monthly increase suggests some stabilization, sales remain down 1.4% compared with the same period last year.

    NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun noted that while housing inventory is gradually increasing, supply growth remains slow. As the spring buying season approaches, a key concern is that if demand strengthens faster than inventory expands, home prices could climb further, worsening affordability challenges for first-time buyers.

    However, more encouraging news emerged today from the United States Census Bureau. The latest housing starts report showed that residential construction activity rose for the third straight month, reaching its fastest pace since February 2025. Housing starts increased 7.2% in January to an annualized rate of 1.49 million units.

    The rise was largely driven by a sharp 29.1% increase in multifamily construction, while single-family building activity continued to lag. This development offers some support for homebuilders—particularly Lennar Corporation, which is scheduled to report earnings later today.

    Despite the improvement in construction activity, sentiment across homebuilding stocks has remained cautious, as investors continue to worry about housing affordability and elevated construction costs.

    Spotlight on Homebuilders: Lennar Earnings in Focus

    With many homeowners locked into ultra-low mortgage rates from previous years, the responsibility for adding new housing supply has increasingly shifted to publicly traded homebuilders. Lennar is scheduled to report its Q1 2026 earnings later today, offering investors an important gauge of the industry’s current health.

    Market participants will be paying close attention to several key issues:

    Construction Outlook: Whether Lennar plans to accelerate new housing starts despite ongoing economic uncertainty.

    Mortgage Rate Buy-Down Programs: The extent to which the company continues subsidizing buyer mortgage rates—an approach that has helped sustain sales activity but is beginning to weigh on profitability. Analysts expect gross margins to ease toward the 15–16% range this quarter.

    Upcoming Homebuilder Earnings to Watch

    • Lennar (LEN) – March 12, 2026
    • KB Home (KBH) – March 24, 2026
    • D.R. Horton (DHI) – April 21, 2026
    • PulteGroup (PHM) – April 23, 2026
    • Toll Brothers (TOL) – May 19, 2026

    *Estimated based on historical reporting schedules.

    The Inflation Shock: Tariffs and the Iran Conflict

    The housing outlook is becoming more complex as the U.S. economy faces a sudden two-pronged inflation shock. Although February’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) showed a relatively moderate 2.4% year-over-year increase, that figure is now considered outdated because it was recorded before two major inflationary developments.

    Global Tariffs: After a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States, the administration introduced a 10% global tariff on February 24, which was quickly raised to 15% in early March. These tariffs are expected to increase the cost of imported construction materials. Perhaps more importantly, they could further strain household finances, making prospective buyers even more hesitant to enter the housing market.

    Conflict in Iran: Shortly after the tariff announcement, military strikes by Israel and the United States targeted multiple locations across Iran, triggering sharp reactions in global energy markets. Oil prices surged in the aftermath, and the impact is already being felt by consumers. U.S. gasoline prices have climbed roughly 20% in under two weeks, pushing the national average to $3.58 per gallon.

    Despite the International Energy Agency releasing 400 million barrels from strategic reserves, energy markets remain skeptical that this supply will be sufficient to offset potential disruptions from the Middle East if the conflict persists. Concerns intensified after reports that Iran intends to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed, a move that threatens a critical global oil transit route.

    The Fed’s Dilemma: March FOMC Meeting

    Later this week, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will publish the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred gauge of inflation. Under normal circumstances, this would be the most significant economic release of the week.

    However, due to the 2025 government shutdown, the agency is still working through a backlog of delayed reports. As a result, Friday’s release will reflect January data, meaning it predates both the newly implemented tariffs and the outbreak of the Iran conflict.

    Attention is also turning to the upcoming meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee scheduled for March 17–18. Earlier in the year, markets anticipated that the Federal Reserve might begin easing policy relatively soon. Now, however, expectations have shifted. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, policymakers are widely expected to hold interest rates steady, with current market pricing suggesting the first—and possibly only—rate cut of 2026 could arrive in October.

    Consumer Impact: Windfalls vs. Headwinds

    As the U.S. tax season progresses, many households are receiving larger tax refunds. Consumers often treat these refunds as a temporary financial windfall, typically using them to pay down credit card balances accumulated during the holiday season or to make major purchases such as vehicles or household appliances.

    However, this extra liquidity is unlikely to trigger a surge in housing demand. Instead, it may simply help households cope with rising living costs. Higher gasoline prices, in particular, function like a stealth tax by reducing discretionary income. Rather than saving for a home down payment, many consumers may find themselves allocating more of their budgets toward essential expenses.

    Recent data from the Internal Revenue Service shows that the average tax refund has increased by 10.6% compared with last year, based on figures from the first four weeks of the filing season.

    The Bottom Line

    The U.S. housing market currently finds itself caught between an urgent need for additional supply and an increasingly challenging macroeconomic backdrop. While major homebuilders such as Lennar represent the sector’s strongest source of new housing inventory, they are confronting a difficult environment marked by higher construction costs from tariffs and cautious consumers strained by persistent inflation.

    At the same time, the Federal Reserve appears poised to maintain its “higher for longer” interest-rate policy as it works to contain renewed inflationary pressures. If that stance persists, borrowing costs are likely to remain elevated, limiting housing affordability and slowing demand.

    As a result, the much-anticipated housing market recovery expected in 2026 could face delays, particularly if geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions continue to weigh on inflation and consumer confidence. Until those uncertainties begin to ease, the path toward a sustained housing rebound may remain uneven.

    Sources: Christine Short

  • Historical Data Shows S&P 500 Gains Often Slow After Extended Multi-Year Rallies.

    In late December 2025, I wrote a blog post to reflect on the various factors that influence equity market returns. One of the simplest ways to look at historical performance, however, is to assume that double-digit gains cannot continue indefinitely.

    After three consecutive years of strong returns for the S&P 500:

    • 2025: +17.88%
    • 2024: +24.87%
    • 2023: +26.37%

    it would be reasonable to expect that a typical “reversion to the mean” year for the index might deliver single-digit performance, either slightly positive or slightly negative.

    One of the more interesting developments in 2025 was the resurgence of previously underperforming asset classes, particularly international equities (and even bonds), along with emerging market stocks. These so-called non-correlated trades had been largely stagnant for years, yet international equities posted their strongest performance since 2006 during 2025.

    However, tensions involving Iran have significantly altered the investment outlook for 2026, disrupting the rotational trade that had appeared logical—at least before the recent airstrikes.

    The real challenge now is distinguishing between stocks, sectors, and asset classes that could face genuine long-term damage from the geopolitical conflict and those that are simply undergoing a normal correction driven by news headlines.

    Earlier, the “Liberation Day” correction from late January 2025 to early April 2025 resulted in roughly a 20% peak-to-trough decline. That episode was the last time investors experienced a meaningful surge in market fear and negative sentiment.

    Looking back at history, the last time the S&P 500 produced returns similar to those seen from 2023 to 2025 occurred during the following stretch:

    • 2021: +28.75%
    • 2020: +18.2%
    • 2019: +31.8%

    Aside from 2019, those gains were heavily influenced by accommodative monetary policy and the era of near-zero interest rates. But it is worth noting what happened next: in 2022, the S&P 500 declined by -18.11%.

    In short, some investors describe market behavior as a “sequencing of returns.” The broader takeaway is that after two or three years of strong equity gains, markets often transition into a period where returns become more modest—typically in the single digits. This is not a forecast, but historical patterns are worth considering.

    At the moment, the U.S. equity market may need a significant spike in fear to establish a tradable bottom, particularly following the recent surge in crude oil prices. As always, this commentary is not investment advice but simply an opinion. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should assess their own tolerance for portfolio volatility and make adjustments accordingly.

    Thank you for reading.

    Sources: Brian Gilmartin

  • Gold rebounds as safe-haven demand offsets concerns over inflation and potential interest rate decisions by the Federal Reserve.

    • Gold attracted dip-buying during Friday’s Asian session, ending a two-day losing streak.
    • Declining US Treasury yields weighed on the US Dollar, helping support the precious metal as safe-haven demand increased.
    • However, inflation concerns have reduced expectations for interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, strengthening the US Dollar and potentially limiting further gains in gold.

    Gold (XAU/USD) moved higher during Friday’s Asian session, recovering part of the losses recorded over the previous two days. The rebound came as the US Dollar (USD) paused its three-day rally amid a modest decline in US Treasury yields, offering some support to the precious metal. In addition, escalating tensions in the Middle East have boosted safe-haven demand, encouraging traders to buy Gold near the lower end of the trading range that has persisted over the past two weeks.

    Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, warned in his first public remarks that all US military bases in the region should close immediately or face potential attacks. He also stated that Iran would continue strikes against US bases, even while expressing a willingness to maintain goodwill with neighboring countries. Meanwhile, Donald Trump emphasized that countering Iran’s “evil empire” was more important than the impact on oil prices. In fact, Crude Oil prices have been rising since the beginning of the US-Israel conflict with Iran.

    At the same time, fears of supply disruptions caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have increased concerns about a potential surge in inflation. This has prompted investors to scale back expectations for interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in 2026. Such expectations could push US bond yields and the USD higher, potentially limiting further gains for non-yielding assets like Gold.

    Investors are also waiting for the US Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, due later in the North American session. This key inflation indicator will play an important role in shaping expectations for the Fed’s policy outlook, especially as markets worry that the war could push consumer prices higher.

    Overall, geopolitical developments remain the dominant driver for markets. However, XAU/USD still appears on track to post a second consecutive weekly loss, and the mix of supportive and restrictive factors suggests traders may remain cautious before taking strong directional positions.

    XAU/USD four-hour chart

    Gold continues to receive support around the 200-period EMA on the 4-hour chart.

    Gold is once again rebounding from support near the 200-period Exponential Moving Average (EMA) on the 4-hour chart. This reaction keeps the broader bullish structure intact despite the recent pullback and suggests that XAU/USD bears should remain cautious.

    At the same time, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remains below both its signal line and the zero level. However, the shrinking negative histogram suggests that bearish momentum is fading rather than signaling a fresh downside move. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), hovering around 44, remains below the 50 midpoint but is well above oversold territory, indicating that the current move may be more of a corrective phase within a broader upward trend rather than a confirmed top.

    In terms of levels, immediate support lies near $5,090, where recent intraday lows sit slightly above the 4-hour 200-period EMA around $5,039, creating an important demand zone. A break below this region could expose stronger support near $5,000.

    On the upside, initial resistance is seen around the recent swing high near $5,160. A sustained move above this level could pave the way toward $5,200, followed by the late-stage peak near $5,230.

    A recovery above the $5,160–$5,200 area would likely push the MACD back toward the zero line and lift the RSI closer to 50, strengthening the bullish bias. Conversely, if the $5,090–$5,039 support cluster fails to hold, the 4-hour outlook could shift toward a more neutral or even bearish tone.

    Sources: Haresh Menghani

  • The US Dollar Index slipped slightly below the 100.00 mark as traders awaited the release of the U.S. PCE inflation data.

    The US Dollar Index (DXY) eased to around 99.70 during Friday’s Asian session. Rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East may increase demand for safe-haven assets, which could lend support to the dollar. Meanwhile, the US Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation report for January will be the key focus later on Friday.

    The US Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the US Dollar (USD) against a basket of six major currencies, is trading near 99.70 during Friday’s Asian session. Although the index is slightly lower on the day, it remains on track for a second straight weekly gain and is hovering around its highest level since November 2025, supported by rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

    Officials from the Pentagon and the National Security Council (NSC) acknowledged that they had underestimated Iran’s willingness to shut the Strait of Hormuz following recent US military strikes while planning the current operation. Meanwhile, Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, stated that the strategic waterway should remain closed and warned that Tehran would continue attacks on its Persian Gulf neighbors. The ongoing conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran could continue to support the US Dollar as investors seek safe-haven assets.

    At the same time, expectations for interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve have eased, as surging oil prices raise concerns that inflation could remain elevated and complicate the central bank’s policy outlook.

    Market participants will look to the January US Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, due later on Friday, for further direction. The headline PCE is expected to rise 2.9% year-on-year, while core PCE—the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge—is forecast to increase 3.1% over the same period. A softer-than-expected inflation reading could put downward pressure on the US Dollar in the near term.

    Sources: Lallalit Srijandorn

  • West Texas Intermediate holds losses near $95.00 as Australia releases fuel reserves.

    WTI declined after Australia’s Energy Minister Chris Bowen announced the release of 762 million liters of fuel from the country’s reserves. However, oil prices could climb again as the Strait of Hormuz remains closed amid intensifying tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran. Iran’s new supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei stated that keeping the strait shut should continue to serve as a “tool to pressure the enemy.”

    West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude traded slightly lower during Asian trading hours on Friday, hovering around $95.20 per barrel after surging more than 9% in the previous session. Prices eased after Australia’s Energy Minister Chris Bowen announced that the country would release up to 762 million liters of fuel from strategic reserves and relax fuel stockholding rules to ease supply disruptions linked to the conflict with Iran.

    The Australian government also plans to cut minimum fuel reserve requirements by as much as 20% in an effort to stabilize domestic supply. Nevertheless, oil prices could continue to climb as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed amid escalating tensions between the United States, Israel, and Iran.

    Since the war began, U.S. crude prices have jumped more than 40%. The International Energy Agency (IEA) warned that the U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran could be triggering the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.

    Reports indicate that officials from the U.S. Department of Defense and the National Security Council underestimated Iran’s willingness to shut down the Strait of Hormuz in response to U.S. military strikes while planning the operation. The waterway carries around one-fifth of global oil consumption, making it one of the most strategically vital shipping routes in the world. Any interruption to tanker traffic there can rapidly impact global energy markets.

    In his first public remarks since assuming power, Iran’s new supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei said the closure of the Strait of Hormuz should remain a “tool to pressure the enemy.” He also warned that all U.S. military bases in the region should be shut down immediately or risk potential attacks.

    Sources: Akhtar Faruqui

  • Bitcoin edges higher as cryptocurrencies remain resilient despite Middle East tensions.

    Bitcoin edged slightly higher on Thursday, remaining largely insulated from the geopolitical developments unfolding in the Middle East.

    The world’s largest cryptocurrency was last trading about 2% higher at $71,653.5 as of 20:23 ET (00:23 GMT).

    Prices appear to be consolidating around the $70,000 level as investors assess the ongoing conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran.

    Oil prices surged back toward $100 per barrel, raising renewed concerns about inflation.

    Crude oil prices climbed back toward $100 per barrel, rekindling concerns about inflation. Oil markets were the main force shaping investor sentiment. Brent crude rose above $100 a barrel after retreating from Monday’s spike near $120, its highest level in almost two years.

    The latest escalation in the Middle East involved attacks on two fuel tankers in Iraqi territorial waters and strikes on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil chokepoint.

    About one-fifth of the world’s oil shipments pass through the strait, but tanker traffic has slowed sharply due to security concerns. Iran’s new leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, said on Thursday that the waterway will remain closed.

    The surge in energy prices has renewed fears of global inflation just as central banks had begun considering policy easing. Analysts warn that oil remaining above $100 per barrel could complicate the U.S. Federal Reserve’s plans to cut interest rates and weigh on risk-sensitive assets like cryptocurrencies.

    In recent months, Bitcoin has often moved alongside broader risk assets, and traders worry that another inflation shock could reduce market liquidity.

    Investors are also watching key U.S. economic data for signals about the Federal Reserve’s next policy moves.

    Weekly jobless claims declined slightly last week, indicating that layoffs remain relatively limited. Initial claims for unemployment benefits totaled 213,000 in the week ending March 7, below expectations and slightly down from 214,000 the previous week, according to the Labor Department.

    Continuing claims, which measure the number of people still receiving unemployment benefits, fell to 1.85 million in the week ending February 28 from 1.87 million the week before. This data typically lags initial claims by one week.

    The jobless claims report follows weaker-than-expected U.S. employment figures released by the Labor Department last week. Meanwhile, the U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index—the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation—is scheduled for release on Friday.

    Tether invests in Ark Labs to support programmable payments on Bitcoin.

    Tether said Thursday it has invested in Ark Labs as part of a funding round aimed at advancing programmable payments on the Bitcoin network.

    The investment was included in a $5.2 million round for the startup, which is developing infrastructure to enable faster transactions and support application development on Bitcoin. With this latest funding, Ark Labs said its total capital raised has reached about $7.7 million.

    Ark Labs is building Arkade, a system designed to operate as an execution layer on Bitcoin. The platform aims to help developers create services such as payment networks, lending applications, and digital asset platforms on top of the blockchain.

    The project focuses on improving Bitcoin’s practicality for financial services that require quicker settlement and greater automation.

    Alongside Tether, the round also attracted backing from Ego Death Capital, Epoch VC, Lion26, Sats Ventures, and Contribution Capital. Anchorage Digital, former PayPal vice president of finance Ralph Ho, and several other investors from the digital asset and fintech sectors also participated.

    The project aims to enhance Bitcoin’s usability for financial services that require faster settlement and greater automation.

    Alongside Tether, the funding round also drew investments from Ego Death Capital, Epoch VC, Lion26, Sats Ventures, and Contribution Capital.

    Anchorage Digital, former PayPal vice president of finance Ralph Ho, and several other investors from the digital asset and fintech sectors also took part in the round.

    Crypto prices today: altcoins edge higher.

    Most altcoins followed Bitcoin higher on Thursday.

    The world’s second-largest cryptocurrency, Ethereum, rose 3.9% to $2,135.71.

    The third-largest crypto, XRP, gained 1.2% to $1.4083.

    Solana climbed 4%, while Cardano advanced 2.9%.

    Among meme coins, Dogecoin jumped 4.5%.

    Sources: Anuron Mitra

  • China expands ban on BHP iron ore during ongoing contract negotiations, sources say.

    China has expanded its restrictions on iron ore from BHP Group for the second time in two weeks, intensifying a prolonged contract dispute with the world’s third-largest supplier of the key raw material used in steel production.

    On Thursday, the state-owned buyer China Mineral Resources Group informed domestic steelmakers and traders that, beginning late next week, they will no longer be permitted to take delivery of Newman fines — a widely traded BHP iron ore product stored at Chinese ports, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

    However, customers will still be able to collect shipments that are scheduled for delivery within the next five working days, two of the sources said, requesting anonymity.

    One source noted that the move had been expected. “We had anticipated that restrictions on additional BHP products might eventually arrive, so the decision did not come as a surprise,” the person said.

    BHP declined to comment, while CMRG did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Over the past six months, Beijing has gradually tightened controls on purchases of BHP iron ore by domestic mills and traders as negotiations continue over the company’s 2026 supply agreement.

    China first banned purchases of Jimblebar fines in September, followed by restrictions on the Jinbao product in November.

    Last week, traders were instructed to limit new purchases of Newman fines, Newman lumps, and Mac fines, although buying cargoes already stored at ports was still permitted.
    The latest measure now limits purchases only to existing port inventories of Newman lumps and Mac fines.

    Spillover impact

    Concerned that additional restrictions may soon target the remaining grades, traders have begun offloading their cargoes quickly.

    “We plan to sell all Newman fines stored at ports within the next few days and will also try to exit Mac fines positions,” another source said. “Even if Mac fines are not yet restricted, there is uncertainty about when delivery might be banned.”

    Meanwhile, benchmark April iron ore futures on the Singapore Exchange rose more than 4% on Thursday afternoon to $108.95 per ton, the highest level since January.

    According to another trader, port inventories of Newman fines reached 3.17 million tons this week — an increase of 55% compared with October.

    Sources: Reuters

  • The dollar heads for a second straight weekly gain as the Iran war shows no sign of ending.

    The U.S. dollar maintained its strength on Friday and is on course for a second consecutive weekly gain since the outbreak of the conflict involving Iran, as global market volatility has reinforced its role as the primary safe-haven asset.

    The euro hovered close to its lowest level since November, while the Japanese yen remained weak enough to raise concerns among traders about possible intervention by Japanese authorities.

    As oil prices surged, the United States allowed limited sales of certain Russian petroleum products that had previously been sanctioned due to Russia’s war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, Iran intensified strikes on oil and transportation infrastructure across the Middle East. The country’s new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, also pledged to keep the vital Strait of Hormuz shipping route closed.

    “For now, markets are focused less on diversification and more on inflation and slowing growth,” said Gavin Friend, senior markets strategist at National Australia Bank in London, during a podcast. “The longer this crisis continues, the more we face a dangerous combination of rising inflation and weaker economic growth.”

    The dollar index, which tracks the U.S. currency against a basket of major currencies, climbed to its highest level since November. The rise reflects both its safe-haven demand and the fact that the United States is a net exporter of energy.

    In early Asian trading, the index slipped slightly by 0.04% to 99.63, though it remained on track for a weekly gain of about 0.8%. The euro edged up 0.13% to $1.1525.

    The yen strengthened by 0.17% to 159.08 per dollar after hitting 159.43 on Thursday—its weakest level since January 14. The British pound also rose 0.11% to $1.3356.

    On Thursday, the U.S. Treasury issued a new Russia-related general license allowing the sale of Russian crude oil and petroleum products that were loaded onto ships through April 11.

    According to a report by the Financial Times, the Trump administration has used up “years” worth of key munitions since the conflict began. Meanwhile, U.S. forces are conducting rescue operations in western Iraq after a military refueling aircraft crashed—an incident that U.S. Central Command said was not caused by hostile or friendly fire.

    Earlier this week, the International Energy Agency agreed to release a record 400 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves. However, this would cover only around 20 days of supply lost from disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz and could take weeks or months to reach the market.

    Investors are also turning their attention to next week’s policy meetings at the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank to assess how central bankers might respond to a potential shock in energy prices.

    Data from LSEG showed that the swaps market now expects the European Central Bank to potentially begin raising interest rates as early as June. In contrast, the U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to delay any rate cuts until September, later than earlier expectations of July.

    The Australian dollar gained 0.14% against the U.S. dollar to reach $0.7084, while New Zealand’s kiwi rose slightly by 0.05% to $0.5858.

    In the cryptocurrency market, bitcoin climbed 1.81% to $71,464.23, and ether increased 2.48% to $2,114.22.

    Sources: Reuters

  • The war may soon end, but the Fed’s fight is just getting started

    Before the attack began on Feb. 28, lingering inflation concerns had already made the Federal Reserve cautious about continuing the interest rate cuts introduced last year. While several indicators of price pressure had eased compared with earlier highs, policymakers were reluctant to declare victory over inflation, which had peaked at 9.0% year over year in the Consumer Price Index in June 2022.

    Since then, inflation has fallen sharply and stabilized around the mid-2% range, slightly above the Fed’s 2% target. However, the cautious optimism that accompanied this disinflation may quickly fade because of the war.

    The main concern is that surging energy prices could reignite inflation and force the central bank to keep monetary policy tighter for longer. With oil, gasoline, and natural gas prices rising sharply, it remains unclear how persistent the shock will be—or how the Fed should respond. This uncertainty creates a policy gray area that may take time to resolve. The longer the conflict lasts, the more uncertain the outlook for monetary policy becomes.

    Two key questions dominate the discussion: When will the war end, and what economic consequences will follow? For now, the answers remain highly speculative. Much of the analysis focuses on the recovery of oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz, which remains largely closed due to the conflict and normally handles about one-fifth of the world’s seaborne oil exports.

    The basic calculation is straightforward: the longer shipments remain disrupted, the greater the hit to global supply, which could sustain upward pressure on energy prices. According to estimates from Capital Economics, cited by the Financial Times, prolonged export disruptions would likely extend the period of elevated oil prices and complicate the inflation outlook.

    The challenge for the Federal Reserve is determining which scenario is most likely and calibrating monetary policy accordingly. With no clear end to the war in sight, the near-term outlook for energy prices—and their implications for inflation and economic growth—remains highly uncertain.

    Financial markets are also struggling to assess the range of possible outcomes and are largely adopting a wait-and-see stance. One signal of this caution can be seen in the U.S. 2‑Year Treasury Yield, which is widely viewed as a proxy for expectations about Fed policy. In recent days, the yield has hovered close to the Effective Federal Funds Rate, suggesting investors broadly expect the central bank to keep interest rates steady in the near term.

    Fed funds futures point to a similar outlook, indicating that markets expect the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates unchanged over the next three policy meetings. Current pricing suggests the first potential rate cut could come in July or September, although those expectations remain tentative given the high level of uncertainty surrounding the war’s impact on growth and inflation.

    “The Fed always has a problem in deciding how to respond to a supply shock,” said Alan Detmeister, a former Fed economist now at UBS. “On the one hand, the inflationary effects argue for raising interest rates. On the other, weaker output and rising unemployment point toward lowering rates. It’s not clear-cut, which often leads the Fed to wait and see which side of its dual mandate—inflation or employment—requires the most support.”

    Ultimately, even if a ceasefire eventually stabilizes the region, the economic aftershocks could persist. As a result, the Fed’s policy outlook is likely to remain uncertain for some time, with policymakers needing clearer signals on how the conflict will shape inflation and economic growth.

    Sources: James Picerno

  • U.S. CPI report provides limited insight as energy shock looms

    It’s difficult to get too excited about today’s CPI report. Because the data entirely predates the Iran war, it does not capture the recent surge in energy prices that could make next month’s inflation reading far more dramatic. Normally, this might be considered the last relatively “clean” inflation print before those effects appear. However, the data is not truly clean either, as lingering distortions from earlier shutdowns are still influencing the figures.

    Those lingering effects may become more visible in April’s report, when rent data could show a temporary spike. This is expected because the October owners’ equivalent rent (OER) sample—assumed to have contained zero increases—will drop out of the calculation, potentially lifting the shelter component for one month. By that time, inflation data will also begin to reflect the impact of the Iran conflict. As a result, the next couple of months could bring more volatile inflation readings.

    For February, expectations were roughly +0.26% for headline inflation and +0.24% for core inflation. That pace implies an annual rate close to 3%—still above the Federal Reserve’s target but not dramatically so. However, inflation had already been showing signs of firming even before the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East intensified, raising questions about how markets and policymakers will interpret the latest data.

    The U.S. CPI swaps curve already appears to be factoring in the effects of the conflict. Unsurprisingly, it is inverted, reflecting expectations of higher inflation in the near term due to energy prices. What is more unusual is that longer-term inflation expectations remain lower. While that might initially seem odd, it also serves as a useful reminder that markets may expect the energy shock to be temporary rather than a lasting source of inflation pressure.

    Another interesting point can be seen in the chart of five-year inflation swaps across several regions. Despite the sharp swings in energy prices, U.S. five-year CPI swaps have moved relatively little compared with other markets. This is partly because the U.S. economy is generally less sensitive to oil price fluctuations than many other countries. In addition, the U.S. dollar has often moved in the same direction as oil prices, which can soften the direct pass-through of energy costs into domestic inflation.

    Even so, the move still appears notable. Given that this is a five-year tenor, it is somewhat surprising to see such a reaction when most of the current volatility stems from spot energy prices rather than longer-term inflation pressures.

    With those preliminaries in mind, the actual data is worth examining. Forecasts proved fairly accurate, with headline CPI rising 0.267%, while core CPI increased 0.216%, both broadly in line with expectations.

    The spike in apparel prices is somewhat unusual, although such jumps do occur occasionally and the category represents a relatively small share of the overall CPI basket. The increase in medical care costs—driven largely by hospital services—was somewhat concerning. On the other hand, shelter inflation came in softer, which helped offset some of the upward pressure from other components.

    Both core services and core goods inflation eased on a year-over-year basis. Core goods inflation is now running at about +1% y/y. While a continued downward turn had been widely expected, the key question is where it ultimately stabilizes—around +0.5% or -0.5%. My view is that it is more likely to settle near +0.5%. Even so, the latest trend is encouraging news for the broader inflation outlook.

    The main surprise in the report came from primary rents. While Owners’ Equivalent Rent (OER) rose 0.22% month-on-month, roughly in line with the previous month and continuing to trend lower on a year-over-year basis, Rent of Primary Residence increased by only 0.13% month-on-month.

    This softer reading was notable, although the year-over-year trend in OER may shift in the coming months as the October sample—when increases were effectively assumed to be zero—drops out of the calculation.

    The broader trend in rents is clearly moving lower, but the sharp drop is still surprising—especially given the ongoing cost pressures faced by landlords. It is possible that the decline will partially reverse next month. One likely explanation could be compositional shifts in the data. For example, rents may be softening in large cities as reverse immigration flows ease pressure on housing supply, while outmigration from places like New York City could also be influencing the figures. A deeper breakdown of the data would be needed to confirm these effects.

    Meanwhile, the Lodging Away from Home category rose 1%. This component has been recovering after a dip last year, although hotel prices remain below the post-pandemic surge that followed COVID-19, when pent-up travel demand pushed rates sharply higher. Given the ongoing recovery in travel demand, there is a reasonable chance that hotel prices could reach new highs in 2026.

    Airfares also increased, rising 1.4% month-on-month. This is worth watching closely. As energy prices climb, airlines often pass higher fuel costs on to passengers. While February’s data does not yet reflect the latest surge in energy prices, persistently high jet fuel costs could push airfares higher in the coming months.

    If that happens, it may show up as stronger core inflation, even though the underlying driver would primarily be energy-related rather than a broader rise in service-sector prices.

    The red dot reflects the end-of-February reading. Since then, jet fuel prices have been highly volatile. They are currently around $3.49, after briefly reaching $4.11 just a few days ago. Such swings in fuel costs typically feed through to airline pricing with a short lag, meaning the impact is likely to appear in next month’s airfare data.

    Turning to “supercore” inflation—core services excluding shelter—**the pace eased compared with the previous month. Last month, supercore rose 0.59% month-on-month, while this month it increased a more moderate 0.35% m/m.

    On a year-over-year basis, core services excluding rents currently stand at 2.94%. However, that figure is likely to jump next month due to base effects. The comparison will drop the unusually weak reading from last March, when several travel-related categories posted sharp declines: airfares fell 5.27%, lodging away from home dropped 3.54%, and car and truck rentals declined 2.66%.

    As those unusually weak numbers roll out of the calculation, the year-over-year supercore measure will likely rise—even if the month-to-month readings remain relatively modest. And given recent developments in travel and energy costs, those monthly figures may not stay soft for long.

    The overall distribution of price changes this month is also notable. Several categories recorded increases of less than 1% on an annualized month-to-month basis, although most of them were only slightly below that threshold.

    It is also worth noting that the figures shown in red reflect adjustments based on my own estimate of seasonal patterns, rather than the methodology used by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

    There were also many categories in the upper tail of the distribution, although the upper tail appears longer than the lower one. Of course, Median CPI—a measure published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland—doesn’t depend on how long those tails are. That is precisely the point of using a median measure.

    While I’m not fully confident in my estimate this month, I expect the median reading to come in relatively soft, likely below 0.2%.

    Typically, median CPI tends to run comfortably above the mean CPI because for many years inflation has existed in a disinflationary regime, where price-change distributions were skewed to the downside—meaning the tails were longer on the negative side. In such environments, the median usually sits above the mean. This month, however, that pattern may not hold. During inflationary cycles, the distribution often flips, with longer tails on the upside, causing the mean to exceed the median. That said, one month of data is not enough to draw firm conclusions.

    Regarding monetary policy, the February CPI figures may not carry much weight given the developments in March. Markets appear to be misinterpreting the recent energy price spike, treating it as an inflationary impulse that complicates the Federal Reserve’s policy path amid soft employment data. In reality, energy-driven increases in CPI are not typically the kind of inflation central banks try to suppress through tighter policy. Energy prices tend to be mean-reverting and are often anti-growth, meaning they slow economic activity.

    Earlier observations about the CPI swaps curve—which is inverted and shows lower longer-term inflation expectations than a month ago—likely reflect markets beginning to price in a possible recession. While recessions themselves are not inherently disinflationary, markets often treat them that way.

    If the Fed were to tighten policy in response to an energy-driven spike in inflation, it could worsen an economic slowdown. That dynamic contributed to several policy mistakes during the 1970s inflation crisis, something modern policymakers are well aware of. As a result, an energy shock combined with weak employment data is more likely to push the Fed toward easing rather than tightening.

    In that sense, the current situation would not qualify as classic stagflation if core inflation continues to moderate. It may resemble “stag”—sluggish growth—but a higher headline CPI driven by energy does not necessarily signal persistent inflation if core and median measures remain contained.

    That said, there are reasons for caution. Core and median inflation may not remain subdued indefinitely. There are already signs they could move back toward the mid-to-high 3% range, and indicators such as the Enduring Investments Inflation Diffusion Index are trending higher, suggesting broader price pressures could gradually re-emerge.

    (That said, the Federal Reserve does not necessarily share this view. We may eventually find ourselves discussing stagflation in a more literal sense, but many observers could still be misled by spikes in headline inflation.)

    Another key implication is that the February data will likely have limited influence on policy decisions. Given the events that unfolded in March, the CPI figures for February are already somewhat outdated. Since the report came in largely in line with expectations, markets are unlikely to dwell on it for long.

    In short, February’s inflation print will probably be forgotten quickly. Attention will soon shift to the next few releases, which are likely to reflect the impact of the recent energy shock. Those upcoming numbers could be far more dramatic—and not necessarily in a reassuring way.

    Sources: Michael Ashton

  • Strong CPI data boosts expectations for Fed rate cuts

    The U.S. dollar remains exceptionally strong, a factor that could help keep U.S. financial markets relatively resilient. Because gold is priced in dollars, the metal may once again attract nervous investors as a safe haven. At the same time, shipping disruptions have created an acute shortage of fertilizers, raising concerns about potential food supply shortages.

    Meanwhile, the International Energy Agency has proposed the largest release of oil reserves in its history—around 400 million barrels—to help offset supply disruptions linked to tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. Bloomberg also reported that Germany and Japan are preparing to tap their strategic crude reserves in the coming days.

    Signs of stress are also emerging in private credit markets. BlackRock has restricted withdrawals from one of its flagship private credit vehicles, the HPS Corporate Lending Fund, after a surge in redemption requests. The $26 billion fund received about $1.2 billion in withdrawal requests during the first quarter but will permit only $620 million in redemptions—roughly 5% of the fund. If anxiety spreads further across private credit markets, it could tighten lending conditions and slow economic growth, potentially prompting the Federal Reserve to respond with additional interest-rate cuts.

    Inflation data also supported expectations for future rate reductions. The U.S. Department of Labor reported that the Consumer Price Index rose 0.3% in February and 2.4% over the past 12 months, with both headline and core readings matching economists’ forecasts. A particularly encouraging detail was the moderation in shelter costs—often measured through owners’ equivalent rent—which increased only 0.2% in February. Given that shelter costs have risen about 3% over the past year and have been a major driver of inflation, this slowdown suggests price pressures in that category may be cooling more rapidly.

    On the corporate front, Nvidia is set to host its annual GPU Technology Conference next week, where the company is expected to unveil details about its next-generation chip architecture. Anticipation surrounding the event has already helped lift semiconductor and memory stocks. The conference is also expected to emphasize optical networking technologies, which could benefit companies such as Ciena, Corning, and Ubiquiti.

    Sources: Louis Navellier

  • Logistics firm GLP seeks $20 billion valuation in planned Hong Kong IPO, sources say

    Singapore-based logistics firm GLP is targeting a valuation of around $20 billion through a potential initial public offering in Hong Kong, which could take place as early as this year, according to two people familiar with the matter.

    The company has been discussing the possible listing with advisers including Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, one source and a third person with knowledge of the plans said.

    However, both the size and timing of the offering have yet to be finalized.

    Under the rules of the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, large-cap companies typically float at least 15% of their shares in an IPO.

    The sources declined to be identified as the discussions are private. GLP, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley all declined to comment.

    If completed, the listing would add a major name to a revitalized equity capital market in Hong Kong, where the current IPO pipeline is largely dominated by companies from China.

    After ranking first globally for IPO fundraising last year, Hong Kong entered 2026 with a strong pipeline. About $5.5 billion was raised through IPOs and secondary listings in January alone, according to data from HKEX and London Stock Exchange Group.

    Return to public markets

    A Hong Kong listing would mark a return to public markets for GLP, which was taken private from the Singapore Exchange in 2017 in a S$16 billion ($12.6 billion) deal led by investors backing CEO Ming Mei.

    Investors involved in the privatization included Hopu Investment, Hillhouse, the investment arm of Bank of China, and Ping An Insurance.

    GLP describes itself as a global thematic investor and business builder focused on logistics real estate, digital infrastructure, renewable energy and related technologies. The firm manages more than $80 billion in assets across real assets and private equity.

    In recent years, GLP has sought to strengthen its capital base and reshape its business. In August, a subsidiary of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority agreed to invest up to $1.5 billion in the company.

    Earlier, in March 2025, GLP sold GCP International to Ares Management in a deal that included $3.7 billion upfront and a potential earn-out of up to $1.5 billion.

    Sources: Reuters

  • The dollar edges higher as oil spikes during the Iran war, with in-line CPI figures barely affecting markets.

    The U.S. dollar strengthened on Wednesday as rising oil prices reignited inflation concerns, while an in-line and backward-looking U.S. consumer inflation reading did little to reinforce expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts.

    By 16:03 ET (20:03 GMT), the U.S. Dollar Index—tracking the greenback against a basket of six major currencies—had climbed 0.4% to 99.22. The euro slipped 0.3% to 1.1570, while the British pound was largely unchanged at 1.3416.

    Oil prices climb despite record release from strategic reserves

    Oil prices rose on Wednesday as the conflict with Iran showed little sign of easing, with a record release of 400 million barrels from emergency reserves by the International Energy Agency (IEA) doing little to calm concerns about rising inflation.

    In a note, analysts at ING said the foreign-exchange market remains “strongly driven” by the recent sharp swings in oil prices.

    Market attention remains focused on the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage south of Iran through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil supply passes, much of it headed to Asia. Concerns over potential Iranian attacks have caused a buildup of vessels on both sides of the strait, as shipping companies seek to ensure crew safety and face difficulties securing insurance for voyages.

    Brent crude, the global benchmark, is now trading near $90 per barrel after surging to $120 earlier in the week. U.S. gasoline prices have also climbed, raising the risk of renewed inflationary pressure that could prompt the Federal Reserve to adopt a more hawkish monetary policy stance. Higher interest rates may in turn attract foreign capital, providing additional support for the U.S. dollar.

    Oil prices have remained highly sensitive to developments in the Middle East. Comments from the U.S. Energy Secretary that the military had escorted a tanker through the Strait of Hormuz sent Brent prices swinging between $81 and $92 per barrel.

    President Donald Trump has also threatened to intensify U.S. attacks on Iran following reports that Tehran had deployed naval mines in the Strait of Hormuz. After a CNN report suggested that mines had been placed in the bottleneck—though not yet extensively—Trump warned on Tuesday that Iran would face retaliation “at a level never seen before” if the mines were not removed.

    The IEA’s coordinated release announced on Wednesday far exceeds the 182 million barrels made available by member countries after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    ING analysts described the move as a “temporary measure,” arguing that only military de-escalation would be capable of pushing crude prices sustainably lower. They added that the large reserve release could also signal that markets should not expect an immediate ceasefire.

    “In our view, these mixed signals could prevent the dollar from falling much further today unless there are encouraging headlines on de-escalation,” the ING analysts said.

    U.S. consumer inflation comes in line with forecasts

    The February Consumer Price Index (CPI) report drew attention on Wednesday, although the data does not reflect the impact of the Iran conflict or the resulting surge in oil prices, making it more backward-looking than usual.

    According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, headline CPI rose 0.3% month-on-month and 2.4% year-on-year in February, both in line with market expectations. Core CPI increased 0.2% from the previous month and 2.5% from a year earlier, also matching forecasts.

    Despite meeting estimates, the report is likely to receive limited attention as markets focus on developments in the Middle East. Concerns that higher oil prices could trigger renewed inflationary pressure may prompt the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates on hold.

    “The good news is that inflation didn’t come in higher than expected in this morning’s CPI report, but the data is backward-looking and reflects a period before the war in Iran began,” said Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer at Northlight Asset Management.

    “It is widely assumed — and we agree — that the Fed will remain on hold for longer as policymakers wait to see whether inflation expectations begin to rise and become entrenched, or if conditions return to where they were before the military operations in the Middle East,” Zaccarelli added.

    Sources: Anuron Mitra

  • Oil prices surged above $100 per barrel following tanker attacks in Iraq and disruptions at a major port in Oman.

    Oil prices surged in Asian trading on Thursday, climbing back above the key $100 per barrel mark as concerns mounted over energy supply disruptions tied to the ongoing conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran.

    Brent crude futures jumped more than 9% to $100.25 per barrel by 22:52 ET (02:52 GMT), while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) rose 8.8% to $93.67 per barrel.

    Reports indicated that two international oil tankers were attacked in the northern Persian Gulf near Iraq and Kuwait. Videos circulating online showed the vessels on fire, with Iraqi media blaming the strike on Iran.

    Separately, Bloomberg reported that Oman evacuated all ships from the major oil export terminal at Mina Al Fahal as a precaution following a series of attacks on vessels in the region.

    These incidents suggest the conflict is spreading beyond the Strait of Hormuz, as the war entered its thirteenth straight day on Thursday. Attacks on tankers and port shutdowns intensified fears of supply disruptions, particularly after Iran warned that no crude oil would pass through the strategic waterway, which carries roughly 20% of global oil shipments. The country was reported to have already blocked traffic through the route earlier this week.

    However, oil prices stayed below their weekly highs as several countries moved to counter potential supply shortages. Reports suggested the International Energy Agency was preparing to release a record 400 million barrels from strategic reserves. Meanwhile, Donald Trump said the United States would release 172 million barrels from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve to ease energy market pressures caused by the conflict.

    Despite repeated claims from U.S. officials that the war could soon end, the fighting has shown little sign of easing. Oil prices had earlier surged to nearly $120 per barrel earlier this week.

    Sources: Ambar Warrick

  • Nasdaq, S&P 500, Russell 2000 ranges widen as traders search for direction

    Markets appear to be reflecting the uncertainty surrounding developments in the Middle East, showing the same kind of indecision that currently characterizes the U.S. administration’s approach to the region. While headlines emphasize sharp declines, actual price action has been more mixed. The Nasdaq Composite has been particularly resilient, even as concerns about a potential AI bubble add pressure to the technology sector.

    On the technical side, a declining resistance line drawn from January now intersects near Tuesday’s closing level. This area could present a potential short setup, with risk management defined by a stop placed on a close above Tuesday’s sharp spike high.

    Although there is a weak buy signal present, several other indicators remain bearish. This cautious outlook persists despite the Nasdaq’s recent surge in relative performance compared with the Russell 2000, often tracked through the iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

    After Monday’s bullish engulfing pattern in the Russell 2000, the market followed with a “gravestone doji” formation, suggesting a potential loss of upward momentum. However, the signal carries somewhat less weight because the index is not currently in overbought territory.

    Even so, the pattern may present a shorting opportunity, particularly after the index failed to secure a close above the $255 level. A prudent risk management approach would place stops on a high-volume move above $258.

    The iShares Russell 2000 ETF—often used as a trading proxy for the index—could reflect similar technical dynamics as traders watch for confirmation of either renewed weakness or a recovery attempt.

    The S&P 500 ended the session with an indecisive spinning top candlestick at what had previously been support but now appears to be acting as resistance. This shift suggests the market is struggling to establish a clear directional bias.

    Resistance within the broader trading range is now relatively well defined, and a move back toward Monday’s candlestick range appears possible in the near term. While a deeper pullback toward the 200-day moving average cannot be ruled out, the broader picture points toward the development of a wider consolidation range.

    In this evolving structure, 6,550 is emerging as a potential new support level, reinforcing the likelihood that the index may continue trading within an expanded range rather than entering a sustained trend in the immediate term.

    The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index moved close to the 7,800 support level, which could develop into the next key floor for the emerging trading range.

    Technical indicators remain broadly negative, although the index has not yet reached oversold territory. A further decline toward the 7,800 level would likely push momentum indicators into an oversold condition, potentially setting up the conditions for a short-term stabilization or rebound.

    Among potential long opportunities, Bitcoin stands out. What initially appeared to be a potential bull trap is now developing into a test of the 50-day moving average, a level that could determine the next directional move.

    If Bitcoin manages to break above this moving average, it could open the path toward the 200-day moving average and potentially a move toward the $85,000 level. While technical signals remain mixed, the MACD has managed to maintain a modest buy signal, suggesting that bullish momentum has not fully faded.

    Notably, the cryptocurrency has already fallen roughly 50% from its peak last year. Given the magnitude of that correction, the balance of probabilities may now favor further upside if key technical resistance levels begin to give way.

    Traders currently face a mixed set of opportunities across major markets. On one side, several leading equity indices—such as the S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Russell 2000—are presenting potential short setups as technical resistance levels come into play.

    On the other side, Bitcoin is shaping up as a possible long trade if it can push through key moving-average resistance and build bullish momentum.

    In short, the market currently offers both bearish equity setups and a bullish crypto opportunity—leaving traders to decide which side of the risk spectrum they want to engage.

    Sources: Declan Fallon

  • Hormuz risk turns oil into the market’s volatility driver

    President Donald Trump appears to be effectively controlling the pace and direction of the conflict, a point echoed by U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. For traders, this concentration of decision-making power is not entirely unfamiliar, as markets have grown accustomed to navigating policy shocks driven by Trump. In theory, when authority is concentrated in a single figure, it could narrow the range of possible outcomes.

    In practice, however, the opposite may be happening. During most geopolitical crises, markets assess risks through institutional processes—cabinet deliberations, coalition coordination, and diplomatic negotiations. These structures allow traders to gradually build probability models for how events may unfold. This time, while the decision-making framework appears more centralized, the range of potential outcomes seems broader. When the decision loop runs through a single, highly unpredictable leader, markets struggle to rely on consistent messaging. Instead of clarity, price action begins to reflect personality, tone, and mood.

    As a result, global financial markets are being influenced not only by economic fundamentals but also by political rhetoric and timing. Traders find themselves constantly reacting to headlines—whether from press briefings or social media—because a single comment can shift market positioning more quickly than traditional macroeconomic analysis.

    This dynamic defined one of the week’s most chaotic trading sessions. Market movements were not driven by earnings revisions, macroeconomic releases, or the typical interaction between bond and equity markets. Instead, crude oil became the central driver of market sentiment, with every headline emerging from the Strait of Hormuz quickly rippling across equities, currencies, and safe-haven assets. When volatility spikes in energy markets, it rarely remains confined to commodities. Oil remains a critical component of the global economic system, meaning fluctuations in its price often transmit shocks across multiple asset classes.

    The Asian trading session initially opened with cautious optimism. After Trump suggested the conflict might be approaching some form of resolution, crude prices moved sideways, well below the sharp volatility seen previously. For a short period, it appeared that markets might return to pricing economic fundamentals rather than reacting to geopolitical developments.

    That sense of calm proved short-lived. Hegseth later warned that Tuesday could become the most intense day of strikes in the conflict. At that point, markets quickly reassessed the situation, realizing that the earlier calm might have been only a temporary pause before further escalation. As a result, the geopolitical risk premium rapidly returned to oil prices.

    For traders, the oil market has effectively become the roulette ball—bouncing unpredictably as new headlines hit the market. The result is a trading environment that feels less like a traditional price discovery process and more like a casino table, with participants watching the wheel spin and trying to anticipate where the next move will land.

    Follow the bouncing barrel

    Overnight: After Donald Trump delivered a quasi “all-clear” tone the previous day, oil prices moved sideways during overnight trading, remaining well above the sharp lows seen during the earlier selloff.

    09:00 ET: Reports that the International Energy Agency was convening a meeting to discuss the possibility of a coordinated Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) release pushed crude prices lower.

    12:45 ET: U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright posted on social media that the U.S. military had escorted an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz, triggering a sharp drop in oil prices.

    13:10 ET (approx.): Wright deleted the post shortly afterward. Journalists cited sources denying the escort operation, while Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officials also rejected the claim—prompting oil prices to rebound.

    13:25 ET: CBS News reported that U.S. intelligence believed Iran may be laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz, sending crude prices sharply higher.

    14:00 ET: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed there had been no tanker escort, which helped extend the upward move in oil.

    14:20 ET: The International Energy Agency concluded its meeting without announcing any coordinated SPR release, allowing oil prices to climb further.

    By the closing bell, the overall result appeared deceptively calm. West Texas Intermediate crude oil settled around $85 a barrel—technically lower than the previous close but essentially unchanged from levels seen when equities finished trading the day before. Anyone focusing only on the closing price would miss the real story. The session itself demonstrated how modern markets behave when geopolitics drives price action and information arrives in fragments rather than through formal policy announcements.

    The options market, however, reveals the deeper dynamic. Volatility in crude rose again, and the skew in pricing has become pronounced. Investors are paying the largest premiums in years for call options on WTI futures relative to puts—an indication that traders remain uneasy about potential upside risks tied to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. In effect, the derivatives market is insuring against the possibility that the next headline could remove additional barrels from global supply. In an environment where tanker movements slow and supply routes tighten, the real threat is not yesterday’s price spike but the next one.

    That anxiety is grounded in fundamentals. If disruptions in the Gulf expand—or simply persist longer than expected—oil prices would likely rise as more Middle Eastern supply faces shutdown risks and potential force majeure declarations. Even with diversion pipelines and strategic reserves acting as buffers, the scale of possible disruption clashes with a global market that still consumes more than 100 million barrels per day. While daily trading may appear dominated by headlines, the underlying arithmetic of missing supply continues to shape market expectations.

    The uncertainty also spilled directly into equity markets. When crude prices fell earlier in the session, stocks briefly rallied as inflation concerns eased and interest-rate-sensitive sectors found support.

    However, Asian and European equities remain particularly vulnerable because both regions are major energy importers. Markets have become highly sensitive to Brent crude oil once it moves above the $85 level. That threshold is deeply embedded not only in trader psychology but also within automated trading systems that now dominate market flows. When crude rises above that zone, systematic strategies, energy sensitivity models, and macro-risk algorithms often trigger a reflexive reaction, amplifying the feedback loop between oil and equities. In practical terms, the relationship becomes mechanical: higher oil prices tend to pressure Asian equities, while cooling crude prices allow stocks to stabilize.

    Even in U.S. markets, the environment is not ideal for absorbing shocks. According to the Delta One desk at Goldman Sachs, liquidity conditions remain relatively thin. Depth in the S&P 500 order book sits near $4.53 million—around 25% below the 20-day average—while overall market trading volumes are also roughly 25% lower than typical levels. This means markets are attempting to interpret large macroeconomic signals with reduced liquidity, a situation that can amplify price swings whenever oil becomes the trigger.

    In effect, the broader financial system spent the session taking cues from the crude market. When oil moves sharply, equity markets quickly react. While this correlation may weaken during calmer periods, it becomes dominant when the Strait of Hormuz turns into the world’s most important venue for price discovery in energy markets.

    For traders, the lesson is clear. In stable environments, fundamentals dominate and models guide trading decisions. But during geopolitical crises—particularly those involving Middle Eastern energy supply—unexpected shocks become the primary driver. Information itself becomes the commodity being traded. Headlines, signals, and rumors can move prices as much as actual supply changes. When global risk perception hinges on a small number of political decisions—often shaped by figures such as Donald Trump—markets stop behaving like predictable equations and begin reacting more like mood indicators, capable of changing direction with a single statement or social media post.

    Sources: Stephen Innes

  • Gold tests resistance as investors await U.S. CPI inflation data

    Gold prices are stabilizing near a key resistance area as global financial markets position ahead of the latest U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) report. The inflation data due later in the session is expected to be one of the week’s most important macroeconomic events, with the potential to influence expectations for Federal Reserve policy, real interest rates, and global asset allocation.

    Across markets, investors have already begun adjusting their positions, trimming directional exposure before the data release. Precious metals have remained relatively supported, while performance across other asset classes has been more mixed, underscoring gold’s role as a defensive asset during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty.

    Instead of taking aggressive new positions, many traders are adopting a wait-and-see stance as the market enters the final hours ahead of the CPI release. Such cautious positioning often leads to short-term consolidation across major assets as participants manage risk before potentially market-moving economic data.

    Inflation data emerges as the key macro catalyst for markets

    The upcoming U.S. CPI release is considered the most important scheduled macroeconomic event of the week, as inflation data directly shapes expectations for Federal Reserve policy, real interest rates, and the direction of the U.S. dollar. All three factors have historically played a major role in influencing gold price movements.

    When inflation data comes in stronger than expected, markets often reassess how persistent price pressures may be and whether monetary policy could remain restrictive for longer. In such situations, investors tend to increase allocations to assets that help preserve purchasing power, which typically supports demand for gold and other precious metals.

    Conversely, softer inflation readings can trigger the opposite reaction. If price pressures appear to be easing, investors may anticipate that the Federal Reserve will have greater flexibility to slow or pause its tightening cycle. Shifts in interest-rate expectations frequently ripple through currency markets and broader commodity positioning, which in turn affects gold price dynamics.

    Because of this sensitivity, gold often enters a phase of consolidation ahead of major inflation releases as traders reduce exposure while waiting for clearer macroeconomic signals.

    Recent market behavior reflects this pattern. Movements in U.S. Treasury yields and currency markets have remained relatively contained, while equity indices have shown uneven performance across different regions. These mixed signals suggest that investors are largely focused on the upcoming inflation data rather than reacting to short-term fluctuations in individual markets.

    Precious metals stay supported amid cautious market positioning

    Within the broader metals complex, gold continues to act as the anchor asset guiding investor flows. While silver and other metals have shown greater short-term volatility, gold remains the primary reference point for portfolio allocation during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty.

    Demand for precious metals has stayed relatively stable even as other commodity sectors display more volatile price movements. Energy markets, in particular, have recently experienced sharp swings, underscoring a growing divergence between the behavior of industrial commodities and defensive assets.

    This divergence indicates that investors are reassessing broader macro risks rather than simply reacting to individual commodity price fluctuations. With inflation expectations and the outlook for monetary policy still uncertain, capital flows are increasingly being directed toward assets that can help preserve value during periods of financial instability.

    Technical structure shows price compression below resistance

    From a technical standpoint, gold is currently trading within a consolidation range just below its recent highs. The Renko chart highlights a resistance zone around the $5,225 level, where several attempts to extend the rally have stalled in recent sessions.

    After testing this resistance, price action pulled back and entered a compression phase around the $5,200 region. This level has repeatedly acted as a short-term equilibrium point, where buying interest has emerged to stabilize the market.

    Additional support is visible near $5,190, which has served as a secondary defense area during recent pullbacks. The proximity of these levels suggests that gold is currently moving within a relatively narrow range while awaiting fresh macroeconomic catalysts.

    Momentum indicators also indicate that the market is rebuilding directional energy rather than entering a prolonged reversal. Oscillators have retreated from overbought territory and are stabilizing as price consolidates ahead of the upcoming U.S. CPI release.

    Meanwhile, the ECRO indicator on the chart signals a compression phase, suggesting that volatility is temporarily contracting as the market digests recent price movements. Such compression patterns often appear before major macro events, as traders reduce risk exposure ahead of potentially market-moving economic data.

    CPI release may determine gold’s next directional move

    The upcoming inflation report represents a pivotal moment for gold markets.

    If the CPI data confirms that inflationary pressures remain persistent, investors may increase allocations to precious metals as a hedge against potential monetary instability and declining purchasing power. Such an outcome could allow gold to challenge the resistance zone near recent highs and potentially reignite bullish momentum.

    A sustained move above the $5,225 region would indicate that buyers are regaining control of the trend and could open the door for further upside across the precious metals complex.

    However, if the inflation data comes in below expectations, markets may interpret the result as a sign that price pressures are gradually easing. In that scenario, gold could enter a deeper consolidation phase as investors adjust expectations for monetary policy and interest rates set by the Federal Reserve.

    For now, gold remains positioned near a key technical threshold as markets await confirmation from macroeconomic data. The CPI release will likely determine whether the current consolidation evolves into a renewed bullish advance or develops into a broader pause within the ongoing precious metals trend.

    Sources: Luca Mattei

  • Oil prices swing as markets weigh IEA reserve release and ongoing supply risks

    Oil prices rebounded on Wednesday as investors questioned whether a planned large-scale release of strategic reserves by the International Energy Agency would be enough to offset potential supply disruptions caused by the U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran.

    Brent crude futures rose 59 cents, or 0.7%, to $88.39 a barrel by 07:27 GMT, while West Texas Intermediate crude oil gained 98 cents, or 1.2%, to $84.43 per barrel.

    Both benchmarks had extended losses earlier in Asian trading after plunging more than 11% on Tuesday, despite U.S. crude initially jumping 5% at the market open.

    According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the proposed IEA release would surpass the 182 million barrels collectively released by member countries in 2022 following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

    Analysts at Goldman Sachs said such a stockpile release could offset roughly 12 days of an estimated 15.4 million barrels-per-day disruption in Gulf exports.

    Meanwhile, the conflict continued to escalate. The U.S. and Israel launched what both the Pentagon and Iranian sources described as the most intense airstrikes of the war on Tuesday. The United States Central Command also said the U.S. military had destroyed 16 Iranian mine-laying vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, after Donald Trump warned that any mines placed in the waterway must be removed immediately.

    Some analysts remained skeptical that the reserve release would significantly ease market tensions. Suvro Sarkar, energy sector team lead at DBS Bank, said such moves were unlikely to solve the crisis, adding that oil prices would largely depend on how long the conflict with Iran continues. Strategic signals, including potential reserve releases, may help temper near-term price spikes, he added.

    Leaders of the Group of Seven have also convened to discuss a coordinated emergency stockpile release. Emmanuel Macron is set to host a virtual meeting with other G7 leaders to assess the Middle East conflict’s impact on energy markets and possible responses.

    Trump has repeatedly stated that the U.S. is prepared to escort oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz if necessary. However, sources told Reuters that the United States Navy has so far declined shipping industry requests for escorts, citing high security risks.

    Supply concerns remain

    Energy infrastructure disruptions have also added to supply worries. Abu Dhabi National Oil Company reportedly shut down its Ruwais refinery after a drone strike caused a fire at the complex.

    At the same time, Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, is attempting to increase shipments via the Red Sea. However, current export levels remain far below what would be needed to fully offset the decline in flows through the Strait of Hormuz. The kingdom is relying on the Red Sea port of Yanbu to boost shipments as neighbors such as Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have already reduced production.

    Energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie estimates the war is currently cutting Gulf oil and refined product supplies by about 15 million barrels per day, a disruption that could potentially push crude prices as high as $150 per barrel.

    Analysts at Morgan Stanley noted that even a quick resolution to the conflict could still leave energy markets facing several weeks of disruption.

    Meanwhile, signs of strong demand also supported prices. Data from the American Petroleum Institute indicated that U.S. crude, gasoline, and distillate inventories all declined last week.

    Sources: Reuters

  • U.S. dollar slips amid uncertainty over the end of the Iran conflict

    The U.S. dollar rally paused on Tuesday as investors evaluated signs that the joint U.S.–Israeli military campaign against Iran could be nearing its end.

    The Dollar Index, which measures the greenback against a basket of six major currencies, fell 0.3% to 98.91 at 15:47 ET (19:47 GMT).

    U.S. President Donald Trump suggested that the conflict in Iran—now ongoing for more than a week—could conclude “very soon.” However, he warned that further fighting could occur if Iran attempts to block shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial passage south of Iran that carries about one-fifth of global oil flows.

    Despite these comments, the conflict has shown little sign of easing, with the United States launching its most intense airstrikes on Iran so far on Tuesday.

    Concerns that prolonged disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz could drive global inflation higher had supported the dollar in recent days. Iran’s leadership reportedly warned it would not allow “one liter of oil” to pass through the chokepoint if U.S. and Israeli strikes continued. Still, Trump’s remarks appeared to boost market sentiment.

    Analysts at ING, including Chris Turner and Francesco Pesole, said in a note that markets reversed course after an initially shaky start to the week.

    “After a very shaky start, Monday proved to be a day of reversal for risk assets as President Trump hinted that military operations could end soon,” they wrote. “No one knows whether that will be the case, but Monday’s events show that the U.S. administration is more sensitive to energy than it seemed.”

    However, the analysts added that oil supplies—currently stranded near the Strait of Hormuz or rerouted away from the region—would need to begin flowing normally again for the dollar’s pullback to continue.

    Elsewhere in currency markets, EUR/USD slipped 0.2% to 1.1609, while GBP/USD declined 0.1% to 1.3414.

    Yen remains stable in Asian trading

    The Japanese yen remained relatively steady in Asian trading, with the USD/JPY pair edging up 0.2% to 158.07. The currency continued to face pressure from a stronger U.S. dollar and concerns that disruptions to energy supplies could weigh on Japan’s economy. Japan relies heavily on oil imports that pass through the Strait of Hormuz.

    Revised gross domestic product data for the fourth quarter showed that Japan’s economy expanded more than previously estimated, supported by robust capital investment and stable consumer spending.

    The figures indicated a degree of resilience in the Japanese economy, although exports remained under strain. Private consumption growth was also revised higher but stayed close to its long-term average of roughly 0.3% quarter-on-quarter.

    This economic resilience may provide the Bank of Japan with more room to raise interest rates. However, the central bank is unlikely to tighten policy in the near term given heightened uncertainty in global markets.

    Sources: Anuron Mitra

  • Gold prices climb as investors assess mixed signals from Iran, with U.S. CPI data in focus.

    Gold prices edged higher in Asian trading on Wednesday as investors weighed mixed developments surrounding the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran, particularly concerns about energy market disruptions and the possibility that the fighting could ease.

    Traders are also awaiting U.S. consumer inflation data for February for fresh insight into the health of the world’s largest economy, although the report is unlikely to fully capture the recent surge in energy prices linked to the Iran conflict.

    Spot gold rose 0.2% to $5,204.29 an ounce as of 01:17 ET (05:17 GMT), while gold futures slipped 0.5% to $5,213.11 per ounce.

    Gold breaks above $5,200/oz as markets weigh mixed Iran signals

    Gold’s gains on Wednesday pushed prices above the $5,000–$5,200 per ounce range that had contained trading over the past week, though it remained uncertain whether the breakout would hold.

    The precious metal has experienced sharp volatility in recent weeks, retreating significantly after reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in late January.

    Conflicting developments surrounding the Iran war also contributed to choppy trading this week. U.S. President Donald Trump said late Monday that the conflict was nearing an end. However, exchanges of strikes between the U.S., Israel, and Iran continued into early Wednesday, marking the twelfth straight day of fighting.

    Investors remain concerned that a surge in energy-driven inflation could prompt global central banks to adopt a more hawkish policy stance—an outlook that typically weighs on gold. As a result, the metal’s gains were capped despite rising safe-haven demand.

    Elsewhere in the precious metals market, price movements were relatively muted. Spot silver slipped 0.1% to $88.2245 an ounce, while spot platinum edged up 0.3% to $2,208.89 per ounce.

    U.S. CPI report in focus for fresh clues on inflation

    Markets are awaiting the release of U.S. consumer price index (CPI) data for February later on Wednesday, which is expected to offer clearer signals on inflation and the outlook for interest rates in the world’s largest economy.

    Headline CPI is forecast to hold steady at 2.4% year-on-year, while core CPI is projected to remain unchanged at 2.5%.

    Although the data is unlikely to capture the recent spike in energy prices triggered by the Iran conflict, investors will still monitor the report closely for indications on consumer spending trends and the broader health of the U.S. economy.

    The CPI release follows a weaker-than-expected February payrolls report, which has fueled some concerns that economic momentum in the United States may be slowing.

    Sources: Ambar Warrick

  • Gold: Will the next move be driven by safe-haven demand or by the strengthening U.S. dollar?

    • Gold declines as a surge in oil prices pushes the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields above important levels.
    • However, safe-haven demand tied to tensions in the Middle East is helping limit further losses despite the rise in yields.
    • For now, the key levels to watch are $5,000 as support and the $5,150–$5,200 resistance zone.

    Gold has begun the week on a weaker note after recording its first weekly loss since the sharp drop at the end of January. Although prices attempted to rebound in the latter half of last week, the recovery was not enough to offset the earlier declines.

    The move largely reflects the sharp surge in oil prices, which has pushed both the U.S. dollar and bond yields higher. With oil climbing above $100 today, gold slipped again at the start of the session. As a result, gold is currently caught in a difficult position: escalating tensions in the Middle East are generating some safe-haven demand, but the strengthening U.S. dollar and rising bond yields are acting as significant headwinds.

    Stronger U.S. Dollar and Rising Yields Offset Safe-Haven Demand

    Rising yields typically weigh on assets like gold and silver, which do not generate interest and involve storage costs. In recent months, however, gold has shown notable resilience even as bond yields remained elevated. That strength faded somewhat last week, and at the start of today’s session gold slipped again—an unsurprising move given the firmer U.S. dollar and higher Treasury yields.

    As the session progressed, gold did recover from its earlier lows, though it was still trading in negative territory at the time of writing.

    The recent spike in oil prices has had a mixed impact on gold. On one side, the rise in bond yields and the stronger U.S. dollar has put downward pressure on the metal. On the other, safe-haven demand has continued to limit the downside. If oil prices were to ease somewhat—perhaps through a coordinated release of strategic reserves—gold could find room to move higher again.

    Overall, gold’s price action remains volatile and largely in a consolidation phase, offering both bullish and bearish traders opportunities amid the heightened market swings.

    Key Gold Price Levels to Watch

    For now, the market appears to be trading strictly between key levels, and this pattern is likely to continue until we see a decisive breakout above resistance or a breakdown below the major support levels protecting the downside.

    So, which levels are the most important to watch?

    Support is currently located between $5,000 and $5,050. This zone has been tested several times from above in recent days and has held up well so far.

    As long as gold does not break decisively below the $5,000 level, the overall bias could still favor the upside. Despite the recent rebound in the U.S. dollar and bond yields, gold’s broader trend has remained bullish, making it difficult to dismiss that outlook—especially given the ongoing tensions in the Middle East.

    On the resistance side, the key range lies between $5,150 and $5,200. This area has been tested multiple times since the breakout seen last Tuesday, which initially appeared to signal a potential turning point for gold.

    However, there has been little meaningful follow-through to the downside. The fact that gold has managed to hold steady suggests it may be forming a base around $5,000 before possibly attempting another move higher.

    For now, the focus remains on these levels. Whether gold breaks above resistance or falls below support will likely determine its next short-term direction.

    Sources: Fawad Razaqzada

  • S&P 500 Volatility Eases While Liquidity Worries Remain

    Stocks dropped sharply at Monday’s open but, as anticipated, recovered steadily throughout the session as volatility began to fade. Sentiment improved further later in the day after headlines suggested the war could end soon.

    From a bullish perspective, however, one key challenge remains. Today marks the settlement of roughly $15 billion in Treasury bills. Historical data indicates that markets rise only about one-third of the time on settlement days, while in roughly two-thirds of cases equities tend to decline.

    It is still possible that elevated volatility overrides the typical settlement pattern, allowing the market to post a modest gain of around 40 to 50 basis points. Even so, the historical analysis has generally proven reliable.

    From both an options-market and technical-analysis standpoint, 6,800 is a key level. If the SPX moves above it, the index could quickly advance toward 6,900, which corresponds to the zero gamma level.

    Another concern is that the USD/JPY cross-currency basis has been turning more negative, pointing to tighter dollar liquidity. This comes on top of signals from the Treasury settlement data. Overall, the liquidity situation hasn’t improved much so far and may even be slightly worse.

    That said, the cross-currency basis could widen if markets begin to believe oil prices will stabilize or decline. For now, however, the outlook remains uncertain and difficult to call.

    Oil had clearly become overbought, trading above its upper Bollinger Band while the RSI was above 70. There also appears to be solid support near the $80 level. While prices could decline further, a return to the $60 range in the near term seems unlikely.

    Oil at $80 is certainly preferable to $100, but it is still significantly higher than $60. A $20 jump in prices represents more than a 33% increase, which is unlikely to be favorable for the upcoming CPI report or for consumers paying at the gas pump.

    Sources: Michael Kramer

  • Markets Are Already Factoring in the End of the Iran War

    Financial markets have begun acting as if the conflict involving Iran is nearing its conclusion. However, no diplomatic resolution has been reached, fighting continues, and several critical strategic issues remain unsettled.

    Oil markets reflected the shift first.

    Crude prices surged to roughly $120 per barrel at the peak of escalation fears. Within days, prices dropped sharply, falling back below $90 after remarks from U.S. President Donald Trump suggested the war could end “very soon,” even though he indicated hostilities might persist beyond the coming week.

    Equity markets reacted quickly. U.S. stocks advanced, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite both moving higher as investors returned to risk assets.

    Asian markets soon followed. Major indices in Japan, South Korea, and Hong Kong rebounded after several cautious trading sessions dominated by geopolitical concerns.

    These movements highlight how rapidly market sentiment can shift. Investors appear to be positioning for easing tensions in the Middle East, even though no ceasefire has been agreed upon and rhetoric from both sides remains confrontational.

    By nature, financial markets look ahead. Prices attempt to anticipate future developments rather than simply reflect current conditions. Recent trading patterns suggest investors believe the worst escalation risks will remain contained. Oil falling below $90 while equities climb signals confidence that supply disruptions will be limited and that the conflict will not expand into a broader regional crisis. That confidence may ultimately prove correct. However, markets sometimes move ahead of geopolitical realities.

    Energy markets offer a clear example of this sensitivity.

    Iran produces around 3.2 million barrels of oil per day and sits beside the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow maritime passage through which roughly 20% of global oil consumption moves. Any perceived threat to this route tends to trigger immediate price surges. Traders initially rushed to price in disruption risks during the early stage of the conflict, pushing Brent crude more than 12% higher within days. The recent pullback illustrates how quickly geopolitical risk premiums can fade when expectations shift. Political signaling now plays a powerful role in shaping those expectations.

    Comments from President Trump alone were enough to drive oil prices lower while lifting equity markets. Financial markets process political messaging almost instantly, adjusting prices well before underlying realities change. Modern trading technology accelerates this dynamic. Algorithmic systems monitor headlines and geopolitical developments in real time. Capital flows across asset classes within seconds as military developments, diplomatic statements, and political rhetoric are rapidly incorporated into market pricing. This speed magnifies every shift in sentiment.

    Despite the market optimism, the strategic outlook remains uncertain. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps responded firmly to President Trump’s remarks, stating that the end of the war ultimately rests “in Iran’s hands.” Such statements highlight a fundamental truth: decisions in Tehran will shape the trajectory of the conflict just as much as decisions in Washington, D.C..

    Another factor also deserves close attention from investors: Iran’s leadership transition. Mojtaba Khamenei now holds the role of Supreme Leader following the death of Ali Khamenei. Ultimate authority over Iran’s armed forces and the Revolutionary Guard flows through that position. Leadership changes within Iran have historically influenced strategic priorities, military posture, and diplomatic decision-making.

    Global investors have little experience with Mojtaba Khamenei’s strategic outlook. His willingness to tolerate a prolonged confrontation with the United States and its allies remains uncertain. A longer conflict aimed at draining financial and military resources cannot be ruled out. For now, markets appear comfortable assuming tensions will ease. Falling oil prices and rising equities both reflect this belief. Risk assets rarely perform well when investors expect prolonged military escalation.

    Yet geopolitical conflicts rarely unfold according to market expectations. Political incentives, domestic pressures, and strategic calculations often shape decisions in ways markets struggle to anticipate. Recent weeks have demonstrated how quickly global conditions can become volatile. Sudden geopolitical developments can overturn prevailing market assumptions within hours.

    Investors therefore face a delicate balancing act. Markets reward forward-looking positioning, but ignoring geopolitical risks can be costly. At the same time, excessive confidence in early signals carries its own dangers.

    Current market behavior suggests investors believe escalation risks will remain limited and that the conflict could cool sooner rather than later. That assumption may ultimately prove correct.

    However, alternative scenarios remain possible. Military incidents, political miscalculations, or changes in leadership strategy could quickly alter the course of events, forcing markets to reassess their assumptions at speed.

    Financial markets often move first and confirm later. Recent trading indicates investors are already treating the end of the Iran conflict as a likely outcome. Geopolitical developments, however, have yet to validate that expectation.

    Sources: Nigel Green

  • Bitcoin rebounds above $70K as Trump comments boost risk appetite.

    Bitcoin rebounded above the $70,000 mark during Asian trading on Tuesday as risk appetite improved after Donald Trump said the ongoing U.S.–Israel conflict with Iran could soon come to an end.

    The world’s largest cryptocurrency was last up 3.4% at $70,201.3 as of 01:02 ET (05:02 GMT), after earlier rising to an intraday high of $70,558.4.

    Bitcoin had briefly dropped to around $65,000 over the previous 24 hours as investors moved away from riskier assets amid a sharp surge in oil prices, which heightened concerns over global inflation.

    Risk appetite improves after Donald Trump signals Iran war may soon end.

    Market sentiment improved after Donald Trump said the war involving Iran could end soon, helping ease tensions in financial markets that had been unsettled by fears of a prolonged regional conflict.

    Trump said the situation could ultimately be resolved, although he cautioned that it was unlikely to conclude this week. He also warned that the United States would respond “20 times harder” if Iran attempted to block the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil shipments.

    Oil prices fell to around $90 per barrel on Tuesday after surging close to $120 a barrel on Monday. The pullback helped ease worries about a sharp spike in global inflation that had weighed on markets earlier in the week.

    Asian stock markets rebounded on Tuesday, with major regional benchmarks recovering part of the heavy losses recorded in the previous session after Monday’s sharp selloff. The improved mood followed gains on Wall Street overnight.

    Cryptocurrency markets also moved higher in line with the broader recovery in risk appetite. Still, traders remain cautious as developments in the Middle East continue to influence commodity prices and global market sentiment.

    Investors are now turning their attention to upcoming U.S. inflation data, including the January consumer price index due on Wednesday and the February personal consumption expenditures price index— the preferred inflation gauge of the Federal Reserve — scheduled for release on Thursday.

    Crypto prices today: Altcoins gain as markets trade within a narrow range.

    Most altcoins posted gains on Tuesday, although trading remained within relatively tight ranges.

    Ethereum, the world’s No. 2 cryptocurrency, rose 1.8% to $2,046.92. XRP, ranked third by market capitalization, advanced 2.3% to $1.38.

    Solana climbed 3%, while Cardano gained 1.2%. Polygon was largely unchanged. Among meme tokens, Dogecoin edged up 0.6%.

    Sources: Ayushman Ojha

  • U.S. dollar weakens after Donald Trump signals Iran war may soon end.

    The U.S. dollar pulled back on Monday after reaching a three-month high, following remarks from Donald Trump suggesting that the conflict with Iran could soon come to an end.

    The greenback had earlier strengthened on safe-haven demand as tensions escalated in the U.S.–Israel conflict with Iran, which also drove a surge in oil prices. However, the currency reversed direction and moved sharply lower after Trump’s comments raised hopes of de-escalation.

    As of 17:24 ET (21:24 GMT), the U.S. Dollar Index—which measures the dollar against a basket of six major currencies—was down 0.1% at 99.557. Earlier in the session, the index had risen as much as 0.6%, briefly reaching its highest level since late November 2025 before surrendering those gains.

    Dollar extends sharp gains in powerful run.

    The U.S. dollar has surged in recent sessions, supported by safe-haven demand as a sharp rise in oil prices raised concerns about the outlook for global economic growth. The U.S. Dollar Index recorded its strongest weekly performance since early August 2025 on Friday.

    “The Dollar Index has rallied significantly in a short period, so it may need to consolidate before attempting another move higher,” said David Morrison, senior market analyst at Trade Nation. “It tested the 100.00 level several times last year, particularly during November, but failed to break above it on each occasion.”

    He added that the index would need to build substantial upward momentum to overcome that resistance. “While the U.S. dollar may have finally found a bottom, if the Dollar Index fails to break above 100.00, a retest of the January lows near 95.25 cannot be ruled out,” Morrison said.

    Earlier in the day, crude prices surged to nearly $120 a barrel, approaching levels seen at the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. However, prices later trimmed gains and then fell sharply after Donald Trump told CBS that the war was “very complete, pretty much,” and that developments were progressing “very far” ahead of his administration’s initial four-to-five-week timeline.

    Over the weekend, Israeli and U.S. airstrikes targeted Iranian oil facilities, while Tehran responded with missile strikes against several oil installations across the Middle East.

    Iran also effectively shut down the Strait of Hormuz by attacking vessels passing through the shipping lane, a crucial route for oil supplies to much of Asia.

    Even so, oil prices pared earlier gains on Monday after reports that the Group of Seven (G7) would discuss a potential coordinated release of emergency reserves to counter supply disruptions caused by the conflict.

    Brent crude oil futures for May delivery initially surged more than 30% to a peak of $119.50 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate crude futures jumped about 30% to an intraday high of $119.43. Both benchmarks later turned sharply lower following Trump’s comments to CBS.

    Euro pressured by worries over economic growth.

    In Europe, EUR/USD trimmed earlier losses to trade little changed at 1.1634. The single currency has come under pressure as rising oil prices highlight the eurozone’s reliance on imported energy, dampening expectations for economic growth in the region.

    Analysts at ING Group noted that prolonged high energy prices could undermine the narrative of synchronized global growth in 2026 and weaken Europe’s efforts to catch up with the strong economic performance of the United States.

    Economic data released earlier on Monday also pointed to weakness. Germany’s factory orders plunged 11.1% in January, far worse than the expected 4.2% decline and a sharp reversal from the 6.4% increase recorded in the previous month.

    Meanwhile, German industrial production fell 0.5% in January after dropping 1.0% in the prior month, adding to concerns about the strength of the region’s largest economy.

    Elsewhere, GBP/USD recovered slightly, edging up 0.1% to 1.3432. The British pound sterling had also been pressured earlier as surging energy costs prompted traders to shift toward the stronger U.S. dollar.

    Yen stabilizes after recent volatility.

    In Asia, USD/JPY fell 0.1% to 157.66, although the Japanese yen remained under pressure after heavy losses in the Nikkei 225 as surging oil prices weighed on investor sentiment.

    The yen drew limited support from stronger-than-expected wage income data for January, which showed a notable increase in pay levels—a trend that could reinforce medium-term inflation expectations in Japan.

    Meanwhile, USD/CNY rose 0.2% to 6.9066, moving above the 6.9 yuan level after a weaker daily midpoint fixing from the People’s Bank of China.

    Government data also showed that China’s consumer price index increased 1.3% year-on-year in February, exceeding expectations of 0.9% and marking the fastest pace of inflation in three years.

    The stronger reading was largely driven by higher spending during the extended Lunar New Year holiday period, when demand for travel, services, and discretionary goods rose sharply.

    However, producer price index inflation remained in contraction, leaving markets looking for further evidence on whether China’s inflation trend can continue beyond the holiday-driven boost. Elsewhere, AUD/USD edged up slightly to 0.7071, while NZD/USD gained 0.6% to 0.5932.

    Sources: Anuron Mitra

  • Gold prices edge higher but remain within a trading range as markets watch for de-escalation in the Iran conflict.

    Gold prices increased during Asian trading on Tuesday but remained within a narrow range as investors looked for clearer signals about a potential de-escalation in the U.S.–Israel conflict with Iran.

    The precious metal advanced alongside a broader improvement in market risk sentiment after U.S. President Donald Trump suggested the conflict with Iran could end soon and said Washington was also considering steps to help curb the recent surge in oil prices.

    Spot gold climbed 0.8% to $5,175.48 per ounce as of 01:55 ET (05:55 GMT), while gold futures gained 1.6% to $5,184.79 per ounce. Spot prices had edged slightly higher on Monday after experiencing significant volatility throughout the session.

    Gold stays within the $5,000–$5,200 range as safe-haven demand remains mixed.

    Gold stayed firmly within the $5,000–$5,200 per ounce range set over the past week, as traders weighed a wave of uncertainty surrounding the global economy.

    Although the conflict with Iran boosted safe-haven demand for gold, gains were limited by worries that the crisis could fuel inflation, potentially prompting more hawkish policies from major central banks.

    Analysts at ANZ also pointed out that gold’s strong rally this year has faced bouts of profit-taking, as investors looked to raise liquidity during a sharp selloff in global equity markets.

    Other precious metals moved higher on Tuesday, with spot silver climbing nearly 6% to $89.1915 per ounce, while spot platinum gained 0.7% to $2,201.48 per ounce. In the industrial metals market, LME copper futures rose 1.3% to $13,095.30 a tonne.

    Trump signals Iran tensions may ease, boosting oil supply outlook.

    Risk sentiment improved on Tuesday and oil prices declined after Donald Trump said several times on Monday that the war with Iran could soon come to an end. Trump also floated potential steps to reduce supply disruptions caused by the conflict, including temporarily easing sanctions on certain oil exporters, particularly Russia.

    However, he did not provide a clear timeline for any de-escalation and continued to maintain a tough stance toward Tehran. Trump warned that the Islamic Republic would face severe consequences if it attempted to block the Strait of Hormuz.

    “We will strike easily destroyable targets that would make it virtually impossible for Iran to rebuild as a nation again — death, fire and fury will follow,” Trump said.

    Iran dismissed Trump’s statements and reiterated that it would continue blocking the Strait of Hormuz until attacks by the United States and Israel against Tehran cease.

    The conflict entered its eleventh consecutive day on Tuesday, with tensions across the Middle East showing little sign of easing. A prolonged war is expected to keep supporting gold prices, as safe-haven demand remains strong amid rising inflation risks driven by disruptions in the oil market.

    Sources: Ambar Warrick

  • European Gas Prices Jump as Middle East War Disrupts LNG Supply

    European natural gas prices surged again on Monday, extending the sharp gains recorded last week as the escalating Middle East conflict continued to disrupt global energy flows and unsettle markets.

    By 08:50 GMT, benchmark Dutch TTF natural gas futures had climbed 16.6% to €62.26 per megawatt-hour after earlier hitting a session high of €69.50. Meanwhile, U.S. natural gas futures rose 5.4% to $3.36 per MMBtu.

    The latest rally adds to an extraordinary surge last week as traders responded to growing supply risks. Monday’s jump was triggered by the forced shutdown of Ras Laffan in Qatar — the world’s largest liquefied natural gas complex — sparking concerns over the availability of global LNG shipments. Even if hostilities were to end immediately, market participants warn that supply-chain disruptions could linger.

    “European natural gas rose 67% last week, its biggest weekly gain since the 2022 energy crisis,” analysts at ANZ said.
    The disruption comes at a particularly vulnerable moment for Europe.

    Western Europe is entering a period of relatively low gas storage levels, leaving the region more exposed to supply shocks and raising concerns about its ability to rebuild inventories ahead of the winter heating season.

    Energy markets more broadly have also been shaken by the conflict. U.S. crude oil futures climbed back above $100 a barrel as investors increasingly priced in the risk of a prolonged supply shock from the Middle East.

    The surge in oil and gas prices has also reverberated across financial markets, pushing global bond prices lower as investors reassess the outlook for inflation and interest rates amid rising energy costs.

    Sources: Senad

  • Week Ahead: CPI, PCE, and Jobless Claims Take Center Stage as Iran War Shakes Markets

    The coming week is set to be tense as developments in the Middle East continue to unfold. In the nine days since the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran, the conflict has spread across several neighboring countries.

    Tehran’s actions to effectively close the Strait of Hormuz have triggered sharp jumps in oil and gas prices, forcing economic forecasters to rethink their outlook. Brent crude climbed above $100 a barrel on Monday evening. Against this backdrop, upcoming reports from OPEC and the International Energy Agency (IEA) on disruptions to Persian Gulf energy shipments could strongly influence markets. The outlook has already tightened after the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait cut oil production due to a lack of storage capacity.

    Attention is now focused on whether the conflict escalates further and how it might affect inflation expectations. Investors have already started trimming forecasts for interest-rate cuts this year, including expectations surrounding the Federal Reserve’s March 17–18 policy meeting. Several Federal Open Market Committee members remain concerned about the slow progress toward bringing inflation back to the Fed’s 2% target.

    In fact, minutes from the January meeting showed that several policymakers even saw the possibility that rate hikes might still be necessary.

    As a result, this week’s economic releases could carry greater significance than usual for already jittery bond markets. February consumer price data due Wednesday and January PCE inflation figures on Friday will be closely watched. The PCE index — the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation — could be particularly influential, as it has remained stubbornly near 3%.

    Beyond the United States, markets will also receive updates on inflation trends in China, India, Brazil, and Mexico. Meanwhile, economic indicators from the Eurozone (industrial production), Japan (GDP), Canada (trade and employment), and the United Kingdom (monthly GDP) will offer insight into how President Donald Trump’s tariffs are affecting the global economy.

    The following U.S. data releases are the ones most likely to move financial markets this week, though events in the Middle East may dominate attention.

    PCE Inflation

    After registering 2.9% year-over-year in December, the Cleveland Fed’s Inflation Nowcasting model suggests that headline PCE inflation may cool slightly to 2.8% in January (see chart). Such a reading could offer some reassurance to the more dovish policymakers at the Federal Reserve. However, with inflation trends shifting quickly, many officials may choose to look beyond any short-term improvement.

    CPI

    After easing to 2.4% year over year in January, with core inflation at 2.5%, consumer prices are widely expected to remain broadly stable in February. The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland’s nowcasting model points to roughly a 0.2% month-over-month rise in both headline and core CPI. Still, such stability could prove temporary if stronger inflation pressures emerge in the months ahead.

    Housing Data

    A series of housing indicators scheduled for release this week could provide valuable clues about U.S. consumer confidence as bond yields and the broader economic outlook continue to fluctuate. Markets will be watching February existing home sales and housing affordability data on Tuesday, followed by January housing starts on Thursday, for signs of how the housing sector is coping with shifting financial conditions.

    JOLTS and Jobless Claims

    Recent data showing that U.S. job openings fell to their lowest level in more than five years in December aligns with other indications that the labor market may be gradually cooling. Investors will be watching the January JOLTS report on Friday for signs of any additional softening.

    At the same time, weekly initial jobless claims, due Thursday, will provide another gauge of labor market conditions. Claims totaled 213,000 in the previous week, a level that still suggests a relatively stable job market with limited layoffs.

    Sources: Ed Yardeni

  • Oil jumps 25% while gold declines as the Iran conflict shakes global commodity markets.

    Oil prices surged about 25% on Monday, reaching their highest level since mid-2022. Brent crude was on course for its largest single-day increase on record, while gold declined by around 2%. The sharp moves came as the escalating war involving Iran tightened global energy supplies, strengthened the U.S. dollar, and reduced expectations that interest rates will be cut soon.

    Agricultural markets also moved higher, particularly edible oils, which tend to follow crude oil prices because vegetable oils are widely used in biofuel production. Aluminium prices edged higher due to supply concerns, although other industrial metals struggled under pressure from the stronger U.S. dollar.

    According to IG market analyst Tony Sycamore, the intense market reaction reflects the lack of any clear path to de-escalation in the Middle East conflict. He noted that the situation has turned into a high-stakes standoff where neither side appears ready to back down, increasing the risk of lasting economic damage.
    Meanwhile, Iran announced that Mojtaba Khamenei will succeed his father Ali Khamenei as Supreme Leader, signaling that hardline leadership remains firmly in control in Tehran during the ongoing conflict with the United States and Israel.

    Oil rally pushes agricultural markets higher

    Brent crude appeared set to record its largest single-day gain both in percentage and absolute terms. The surge was driven by the widening U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran, which prompted some major Middle Eastern producers to reduce supply and raised fears of prolonged disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil chokepoint.

    During the session, Brent crude futures climbed to about $119.50 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) reached roughly $119.48 per barrel.

    Analysts at ING Group said in a note that conditions appear to be worsening further. They added that upstream oil production has begun to shut down as producers face limited storage capacity. As a result, Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have started cutting their oil output.
    In agricultural markets, Malaysian palm oil prices jumped about 9%, while Chicago soybean oil climbed to its highest level since late 2022, supported by the strong rally in crude oil. Wheat prices reached their highest point since June 2024, and corn rose to a 10-month high.

    Meanwhile, gold dropped more than 2% as a stronger U.S. dollar put pressure on dollar-denominated bullion. Rising energy costs also increased inflation concerns and further reduced expectations that interest rates will be lowered in the near term.

    The U.S. dollar remained close to a three-month high, which made gold more expensive for buyers using other currencies. Concerns that higher oil prices could drive inflation and delay rate cuts appear to have pushed U.S. bond yields and the dollar higher, offsetting gold’s usual safe-haven demand and sending prices lower.

    Aluminium surges on supply concerns

    Aluminium prices surged to their highest level in four years as supply worries intensified amid the Middle East conflict. Benchmark three-month aluminium contracts on the London Metal Exchange rose to about $3,544 per ton, the highest level since March 2022.

    Two major Gulf producers—Qatalum and Aluminium Bahrain—have already declared force majeure on shipments as tensions in the region escalate. However, other base metals faced downward pressure due to the strengthening U.S. dollar.

    Sources: Reuters

  • Key Markets to Watch – Silver, S&P 500, USD/CAD, USD/MXN, Bitcoin, Nasdaq 100, EUR/USD, USD/JPY

    Silver

    Silver faced a difficult week as the U.S. dollar strengthened for much of the period, though it’s important to remember that its recent collapse wiped out many retail trading accounts.

    That said, this is a market worth monitoring closely because the $80 level represents an important support area and sits near the center of the broader consolidation range.

    If the price breaks below this week’s candlestick, it could open the door for silver to decline toward the $70 level, where I also expect support to emerge.

    Overall, the market has been quite volatile and choppy, and that pattern is likely to persist. Because of this, careful position sizing will be essential.

    S&P 500

    The S&P market declined quite sharply over the week, testing the 5,000 level. This level is a major round number with strong psychological importance, so it’s an area many investors are watching closely.

    If the market breaks below 5,000, it could pave the way for a drop toward 4,800, with the possibility of quickly moving further down to around 4,600.

    From a longer-term perspective, the 5,000 level may continue to act as a price magnet for the market.

    If that remains the case, we could see extended sideways movement around this zone, although my broader outlook still leans bullish over the long run.

    USD/CAD

    The US dollar first strengthened against the Canadian dollar, rising to test the 1.3750 level, but then reversed and began showing signs of weakness. Meanwhile, the 1.35 level below stands as an important support area that many market participants are closely monitoring.

    It is also worth noting that the Canadian dollar has been gaining some strength on the back of rising oil prices. Whether that trend will continue is uncertain, but if oil fails to maintain its momentum, a reversal could follow.

    For now, the market remains within the same consolidation range that it has revisited repeatedly.

    USD/MXN

    The US dollar surged sharply against the Mexican peso during the week, but in reality a pullback had been due. The key question now is whether the 18-peso level will act as strong enough resistance to reverse the move.

    If it does, it could present a solid opportunity to take short positions. However, if the market manages a daily close above the 18-peso level, it may signal that the recent trend is coming to an end.

    All things considered, this is a market where traders may look for signs of exhaustion to sell into, as the interest rate differential still generally favors Mexico.

    Bitcoin

    The Bitcoin market has been quite volatile during the week, but it did manage to break above the $72,000 level. This is notable given the overwhelmingly negative headlines around the world at the moment, and it’s a market I’ll be monitoring very closely.

    If the market can close above the weekly high and continue moving higher, Bitcoin could begin to rally strongly. There may still be debate about what Bitcoin truly represents, but one thing seems clear—it appears to be heavily oversold.

    The key question now is whether buyers will step back in. On the other hand, if the price drops below the $60,000 level, it could trigger a sharp and widespread sell-off.

    Nasdaq 100

    The Nasdaq 100 has been volatile but has continued to show resilience. This is a pattern that appears repeatedly in the US stock market, even when there have been plenty of reasons for it to break down. In itself, that persistence likely says a lot about the underlying strength of the market.

    What I think it tells you is that given enough time, the US stock market, and in this case the Nasdaq 100, will find buyers on any pullback and selling just does not seem to be working out.

    EUR/USD

    The euro weakened significantly during the week. Much of this appears to be driven by expectations that energy costs in the European Union will rise sharply, which could heavily influence the options available to the European Central Bank.

    Keep a close eye on the 1.15 level. If the market breaks below that point, the euro could decline sharply.

    For now, the market remains within the same consolidation range it has been trading in for some time. I do not expect significant movement at the moment, but the 1.15 level will be important to watch.

    USD/JPY

    The US dollar continues to signal the possibility of a major breakout against the Japanese yen, although it has not achieved it yet. The ¥158 level marks the start of a strong resistance zone that extends up to the ¥160 level.

    If the market manages to break above that area, it is likely to move significantly higher. In the short term, pullbacks could present buying opportunities as traders look to pick up the dollar at lower prices.

    Over the longer term, I expect an eventual breakout to the upside. However, the current situation makes it challenging to short the market, while buying directly at this resistance zone is also difficult. It may be best to wait for better value and take advantage of opportunities when they appear.

    Sources: Lewis

  • How the Rise of Passive Investing Is Driving a New Era of Market Speculation

    Since the pandemic, the distinction between passive investing and outright speculation has increasingly blurred. The current surge in speculative behavior extends well beyond traditional financial markets. A similar mindset can be seen in the rapid growth of Sports betting industry as well as the rising popularity of event-prediction platforms such as Kalshiand Polymarket.

    Within financial markets, signs of heightened risk-taking are evident. Margin debt has climbed to record levels, while zero-day-to-expiry options (0DTE) now represent roughly half of total options trading volume. At the same time, the number of leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and their trading activity have expanded significantly.

    As highlighted by The Kobeissi Letter, the technology sector has become the primary focus of this trend. There are currently 108 long and 31 short leveraged ETFs tied to technology stocks, bringing the total to 139 funds. That figure is three times larger than the next-largest sector, financials, which has 47 leveraged ETFs. For comparison, consumer discretionary has 44, and communication services has 34. In other words, the technology sector alone now hosts more leveraged ETFs than the next three sectors combined.

    Although it is harder to measure than indicators like margin debt or sports wagering, aggressive speculation is increasingly visible within so-called passive investment vehicles. One clear example is the rapid and often intense rotations occurring between sector and factor exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    In this article, we examine how today’s speculative environment is influencing trading behavior within passive ETFs. We also explore methods for identifying sector and factor rotations and discuss how investors may be able to take advantage of these shifts—effectively turning the increasingly aggressive behavior of passive investors into potential opportunities.

    Passive Investment Strategy Timeline

    The intellectual foundation for passive investing dates back to Harry Markowitz, who introduced Modern Portfolio Theory in 1952. His research demonstrated that diversification across a broad market portfolio could maximize expected returns for a given level of risk. Markowitz’s work ultimately laid the groundwork for what would later become known as index investing, the core principle behind many passive investment strategies today.

    John C. Bogle is widely regarded as the “father of indexing.” In 1976, he introduced the First Index Investment Trustat Vanguard Group, a fund designed to track the S&P 500. It became the first index mutual fund accessible to retail investors. At the time, competitors ridiculed the concept, referring to it as “Bogle’s Folly.” Decades later, Vanguard oversees more than $12 trillion in assets, demonstrating the success of Bogle’s low-cost, long-term passive investing philosophy. Ironically, Bogle also cautioned that the intraday liquidity of exchange-traded funds might encourage the kind of frequent trading behavior he spent his career advising investors to avoid.

    In 1993, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust became the first exchange-traded fund available to U.S. investors, allowing them to trade a passive index product throughout the day just like a stock.

    Passive investment strategies were originally designed to promote discipline and long-term thinking. Rather than attempting to outperform the market by actively trading individual securities, passive approaches aim to replicate overall market performance through broad diversification.

    Bogle’s Warning

    Despite the strong long-term rationale behind passive investing, investor behavior has evolved in ways Bogle anticipated. ETFs, with their ease of trading and intraday liquidity, have encouraged some passive investors to adopt more active strategies.

    In recent years, sharp performance differences have emerged across broad-market indexes, sector ETFs, and factor-based ETFs. Instead of simply buying a diversified market ETF and holding it over time, many investors now frequently rotate between products tracking major indexes like the S&P 500Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average, as well as sector-focused funds (such as technology, consumer staples, or financials) and factor strategies (including momentum, value, or market-cap tilts).

    Another clear example of speculative behavior within the passive universe is the growing popularity of leveraged ETFs. These funds reset their exposure on a daily basis, which can gradually erode returns over time and makes them better suited for short-term trading rather than long-term investing. This effect, known as Volatility Decay, is significant enough that regulators require warnings in leveraged ETF prospectuses. As stated in the prospectus for Direxion ETFs:

    “If a Fund’s shares are held for a period other than a calendar month, the Fund’s performance is likely to deviate from the multiple of the underlying exchange-traded fund performance for the period the Fund is held. This deviation will increase with higher underlying volatility and longer holding periods.”

    The rapid growth in leveraged ETF products and trading volume—mentioned earlier—reflects the increasing presence of short-term speculation within instruments originally designed for passive investing.

    Another sign of this trend is the sharp rise in thematic ETFs. Funds centered on popular narratives—such as Artificial Intelligence, clean energy, or precious metals—often attract substantial inflows when investor enthusiasm is strong. When the narrative loses momentum, however, those same funds can experience rapid outflows. In many cases, this behavior resembles momentum chasing wrapped in the appearance of passive investing.

    In fact, many investors who consider themselves passive might find—if they reviewed their transaction history closely—that their activity resembles active trading far more than traditional buy-and-hold investing.

    Rotation Analysis

    Recognizing that investors are aggressively rotating across sectors and factors using passive instruments is only the first step. The real challenge is identifying how to profit from these movements. One approach is technical analysis, which can help detect when rotations begin, gain momentum, stall, or reverse.

    We first explored this concept in detail in our 2023 article, Relative Rotation – Unlocking the Hidden Potential. One of the most compelling illustrations from that research compares the relative performance of Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. The chart demonstrates a recurring pattern: when one ETF begins to outperform the broader market, the other often underperforms. This dynamic creates a rotation effect that, when identified early through technical analysis, may provide trading opportunities.

    The more aggressively passive investors rotate between sectors and factors, the more consistent and exploitable these technical patterns can become.

    Narrative Analysis

    While technical analysis can signal when a rotation is beginning or gaining momentum, narrative analysis helps explain why investors are moving capital. Understanding the narrative behind a trade allows investors to determine whether the underlying story is supported by fundamentals or driven primarily by speculation.

    In today’s market—where passive instruments are frequently traded in an aggressive, short-term manner—narratives spread quickly and can have a powerful impact. A compelling theme can generate billions of dollars in ETF inflows within days, often well before the fundamentals justify the move, if they ever do.

    However, not all market narratives carry the same weight. Some sector or factor rotations are triggered by genuine shifts in economic conditions or changes in monetary policy. These developments tend to produce more durable trends. Others arise largely from momentum and media attention. In such cases, a popular theme gains traction, investors pour money into ETFs aligned with that story, and the momentum feeds on itself until enthusiasm fades.

    Distinguishing between these two types of narratives is just as important as identifying the rotation itself. A strong technical signal paired with a weak fundamental story may produce only a short-lived opportunity.

    Summary

    One of the great ironies of modern passive investing is that instruments originally designed to encourage patience and long-term discipline have increasingly become vehicles for short-term speculation. Many investors who consider themselves passive are, in practice, behaving much like active traders—rapidly rotating between sectors and factors based on evolving narratives.

    Recognizing this dynamic is the first step toward maintaining stronger investment discipline. Through our blog posts, daily commentary, podcasts, and the weekly Bull Bear Report, we aim to help investors distinguish meaningful signals from the noise created by constantly shifting market narratives.

    Sources: Michael Lebowitz

  • The “Fiat Collapse” Narrative Ignores the Next Phase of the U.S. Dollar’s Evolution.

    The idea that “fiat is dying” has become a popular slogan among supporters of digital assets, gold enthusiasts, and cryptocurrency advocates. At the center of this argument is the belief that central banks have created enormous amounts of money, leading to currency debasement and ultimately making the U.S. dollar obsolete. We have addressed this debasement narrative before.

    It’s an appealing storyline: inflation is spiraling, governments keep printing money, and the dollar is supposedly nearing its end. While there are legitimate risks to monitor, many headlines emphasize fear more than facts. The message can be powerful, especially when promoters of gold, silver, or other “doomsday” assets use it to push people into acting quickly. A commonly cited piece of evidence in this debasement argument is the familiar chart claiming the U.S. dollar has lost about 90% of its purchasing power since 1966.

    But here’s the key point: that chart doesn’t actually demonstrate currency debasement. It simply reflects inflation—an expected and well-understood feature of a growing economy. Prices tend to rise over time as demand increases, driven by population growth, higher incomes, and expanding consumption. This dynamic is particularly evident in a modern, service-based economy that encourages credit expansion and capital investment. In that sense, it’s not so much that the dollar is losing value, but rather that the economy itself is growing.

    Those who promote the “debasement” argument often overlook how modern inflation and economic systems function. What the chart really illustrates is the declining purchasing power of idle cash. Money that remains uninvested naturally loses value over time relative to inflation. That doesn’t signal the collapse of fiat currency—it simply highlights the importance of putting capital to work.

    While gold advocates frequently argue that gold protects against debasement (in other words, inflation)—which can be true—other assets can serve the same purpose. Short-term U.S. Treasury bills and longer-term Treasury bonds have also preserved value on a real, inflation-adjusted total-return basis. Still, historically, a single dollar invested in the S&P 500 has been the most effective way to maintain—and significantly grow—the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar.

    Most importantly, the term “debasement” does not mean a currency is collapsing. Rather, it reflects the impact of inflation on money that remains uninvested. Inflation gradually reduces purchasing power when income and investment returns fail to keep up. For example, a $100 bill today buys less than it did in 2010 because the overall price level of goods and services tends to rise as the economy expands. While this effect is real, it is a normal outcome of economic growth and monetary policy working together—not evidence of a fundamental loss of confidence in the currency.

    In reality, the U.S. dollar continues to hold a dominant position in the global financial system. As discussed in “The Dollar’s Death Is Greatly Exaggerated,” several key facts highlight this strength:

    • Around 80% of global transactions are still conducted using the U.S. dollar as the primary unit of account or settlement currency.
    • The dollar represents nearly 60% of the world’s foreign-exchange reserves held by central banks.
    • No other currency or asset currently offers the same depth, liquidity, and institutional credibility as the U.S. dollar.

    These facts challenge the claim that the world is turning away from fiat currencies or the U.S. dollar. The idea that the dollar is in decline overlooks strong evidence of its ongoing global demand and widespread use—reflected in the record surge of foreign purchases of U.S. Treasuries.

    The Illusion of Escape

    Those who claim that investors are turning to gold or Bitcoin based on the “currency debasement” narrative either deliberately mislead others or lack a proper understanding of how the modern monetary system works—particularly how pricing, exchange, and settlement function within today’s economy.

    We fully agree that investors should put their “idle” dollars to work in assets such as bonds, gold, stocks, or Bitcoin to help preserve purchasing power over time. However, when these assets rise in nominal terms, the gains mostly reflect shifts in relative valuations rather than a true rejection of the dollar. Many investors, influenced more by headlines than by underlying facts, buy gold or Bitcoin as perceived “safe havens,” believing they are moving away from fiat currency due to fears of debasement.

    In reality, that isn’t the case. These assets are still priced and settled in dollars. Bitcoin commonly trades in USD pairs, and the global price of gold is quoted in dollars. When investors want to spend or use those holdings outside the digital-asset ecosystem, they typically convert them back into the dollar-based system. The notion of fully escaping fiat currency is largely philosophical; in practice, value transfer and financial utility still revolve around the dollar. Historically, the most effective way to protect purchasing power from debasement has been participation in the U.S. stock market.

    Although the debasement narrative often portrays U.S. Treasuries as outdated remnants of a failing system, the reality is quite the opposite. U.S. Treasuries remain the most liquid and trusted financial instruments in the world, forming the backbone of global interest-rate benchmarks, risk-free rate calculations, collateral markets, and international reserves.

    Moreover, a new development in the modern financial system may strengthen the dollar’s influence even further: the rapid growth of USD-denominated stablecoins.

    USD Stablecoins and Why They Matter

    As discussed, the U.S. dollar remains—and is likely to remain—the backbone of the global financial system. This dominance is unlikely to change in either the near or distant future, largely because no credible alternative currently exists. If anything, the rapid rise of USD-denominated stablecoins may reinforce that position even further.

    Today, nearly 99% of fiat-backed stablecoins are pegged to the U.S. dollar. This mirrors the dollar’s dominance in global foreign-exchange reserves, where its share still exceeds that of all other major currencies combined. Despite periodic concerns about inflation or monetary debasement, global confidence in the dollar remains strong. In fact, the growth of USD stablecoins reflects the dollar’s strength rather than signaling its decline.

    But what exactly are USD stablecoins? They are digital tokens designed to maintain a 1:1 value with the U.S. dollar. Unlike volatile cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, whose prices can fluctuate dramatically, stablecoins aim to provide price stability by backing their tokens with reserves of highly liquid assets.

    Two of the largest examples are Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC), which together account for more than 90% of the USD-stablecoin market. By late 2025, the company behind USDT—Tether Holdings—held over $135 billion in U.S. Treasury securities. That level of holdings would rank it roughly 17th among global holders of U.S. sovereign debt, exceeding the Treasury holdings of several countries, including South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Germany, and the United Arab Emirates.

    This development is particularly important when examining claims about the “death of the dollar.” USD stablecoins function on blockchain networks, allowing digital dollars to be transferred and settled globally in real time without relying on traditional banking intermediaries. This feature makes them especially useful for cross-border payments, remittances, and financial activity in regions where banking infrastructure is limited or less developed.

    The International Monetary Fund has noted that while most stablecoin transactions today are still linked to cryptocurrency trading, cross-border usage is expanding quickly, indicating that these digital dollars could play a larger role in the global financial system in the future. As highlighted by Chainstack, …

    “Stablecoins have entered mainstream finance, creating a bridge between traditional banking systems and digital asset networks. Dollar-pegged tokens already process transaction volumes comparable to major payment networks, with activity rivaling systems such as ACH, Visa, and PayPal. By mid-2025, the total supply of stablecoins had surpassed $250 billion, highlighting growing demand for faster, always-available payment solutions.”

    Although stablecoin transaction activity still represents a very small share—roughly 1% of the global cross-border payments market, which totals around $2 quadrillion annually—there are several factors that lead many analysts to expect significant expansion in the USD stablecoin sector in the years ahead.

    These applications align with the ongoing modernization of global payment systems. If USD stablecoins achieve wider adoption, they could evolve into a key layer of infrastructure for digital money movement, which would, in turn, increase the importance of U.S. Treasuries within the global financial system.

    How USD Stablecoins Could Increase the Importance of U.S. Treasuries

    USD stablecoin reserves often include these assets, highlighting that digital dollar infrastructure is closely linked to U.S. sovereign debt markets rather than operating independently from them. As the stablecoin market continues to expand, its connection to U.S. Treasuries may grow even stronger. Issuers must hold liquid, low-risk assets to preserve their dollar pegs and satisfy both regulatory standards and market expectations. Short-term U.S. Treasuries are a natural fit because they are highly liquid and widely accepted as collateral.

    Regulatory developments further reinforce this relationship. For example, the GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, requires stablecoin issuers to back their tokens with high-quality liquid assets such as U.S. dollars or short-term Treasury securities. This requirement increases the likelihood that stablecoin reserves remain closely tied to U.S. government debt. Additionally, if the STABLE Act is enacted, it would impose further rules obligating issuers to maintain safe and highly liquid assets as backing for their tokens.

    Industry forecasts suggest that the USD stablecoin market could expand to $2–$3 trillion by 2030, supported by clearer regulatory frameworks and broader financial adoption. If this scenario materializes, stablecoin issuers could become a meaningful source of demand for U.S. Treasuries. Their reserves would likely position them as incremental buyers in money markets, potentially reinforcing traditional sources of Treasury demand. According to Reuters, as much as 80% of current stablecoin reserves are already held in Treasury bills and repurchase agreements, indicating that reserve management is already heavily oriented toward Treasuries.

    Academic research also indicates that stablecoin demand may already be influencing short-term interest rates. One study found that stablecoin purchases of Treasury bills were associated with noticeable downward pressure on one-month yields, suggesting that reserve demand tied to digital dollars can have tangible effects on real financial markets.

    That said, any discussion of USD stablecoins must also acknowledge the risks involved. Much of this outlook assumes that stablecoins will evolve into a widely used global transaction tool. While possible, that outcome is far from guaranteed. At present, most stablecoin activity remains concentrated in cryptocurrency trading and settlement, rather than everyday commerce or sovereign-level payments. Future adoption will largely depend on regulatory clarity, institutional participation, and sustained global confidence.

    Custodial and transparency risks also remain important considerations. S&P Global Ratings recently downgraded the stability assessment of Tether, citing that only 64% of its reserves were held in short-term U.S. Treasuries and highlighting ongoing concerns around transparency. This emphasizes the need for stronger reporting standards, improved governance, and more regulated custody arrangements if stablecoins are to scale safely.

    As S&P Global Ratings noted:

    “Bitcoin represents 5.6% of USDT in circulation, exceeding the 3.9% overcollateralization marginassociated with a collateralization ratio of 103.9%. A decline in the price of bitcoin or other higher-risk assets could therefore reduce collateral coverage.”

    Another potential challenge comes from the rise of central bank digital currencies, or Central Bank Digital Currency. Governments may prefer to develop their own digital payment infrastructure, which could limit the role of privately issued USD stablecoins in some applications. Even so, if CBDCs gain widespread adoption, they would likely still rely on reserves backed by U.S. Treasuries, given their liquidity, safety, and central role in the global financial system.

    Another consideration is that stronger demand for Treasuries could push yields lower. In response, stablecoin issuers might adjust how they structure their reserves. However, the key point is that these reserves would still consist of dollar-linked instruments. Whether issuers hold Treasury bills, repurchase agreements, or other short-term dollar assets, the peg remains tied to the U.S. dollar. As a result, the system continues to function within the existing dollar-based monetary framework rather than creating an entirely separate financial ecosystem.

    Finally, it is important to recognize the possibility that these developments may not occur at the projected scale. Regulatory obstacles, technological limitations, or changes in macroeconomic conditions could slow or even halt the growth of stablecoins. While the future is uncertain, the evolving structure of USD stablecoins and the broader pace of financial technology innovation suggest that global payment systems are likely to change in the coming years—and that the United States Dollar will remain central to that transformation.

    Conclusion and Investment Thesis

    The claim that “fiat money is dying” is not supported by current data or economic reality. While inflation does erode purchasing power, it should not be confused with the type of currency debasement seen historically. Instead, it reflects the gradual loss of value in idle cash within a growing and expanding economy.

    The United States Dollar continues to serve as the backbone of the global financial system. It dominates international trade, central-bank reserves, and cross-border settlements. At present, no alternative currency, asset, or financial structure offers the same level of liquidity, institutional credibility, or market depth as the dollar.

    The belief that investors can fully escape fiat currencies by moving into assets like Gold or Bitcoin reflects a misunderstanding of how the modern monetary system operates. While these assets can serve as hedges against inflation, they still function within the broader fiat framework. Their pricing, settlement, and liquidity are deeply tied to the United States Dollar, meaning the idea of completely “escaping” fiat is more ideological than practical.

    What appears to be unfolding is not the decline of the dollar but a reconfiguration of its infrastructure—a form of monetary “rebasement” driven by digital technology. USD stablecoins are not undermining the U.S. monetary system; they are extending it. By enabling near-instant digital payments on blockchain networks while holding reserves in U.S. Treasuries and cash equivalents, stablecoins effectively reinforce the dollar’s global dominance.

    If USD stablecoins evolve into a widely used transactional layer—an outcome that remains a forward-looking assumption—the demand for Treasuries could rise substantially. With industry projections placing the stablecoin market at $2–$3 trillion by 2030, issuers could become meaningful buyers of Treasury securities. Such demand could deepen liquidity in money markets, help maintain lower yields, and further integrate Treasuries into the operational backbone of global finance.

    At the same time, investors should remain aware of the risks. The widespread adoption of stablecoins is far from guaranteed. Regulatory frameworks could slow development, transparency and custody concerns persist with some issuers, and Central Bank Digital Currency initiatives could create competing payment systems. If stablecoins fail to expand beyond crypto-trading and settlement use cases, their broader economic impact may remain limited.

    Even with those uncertainties, the broader investment thesis remains compelling:

    • U.S. Treasuries continue to be a foundational global asset. Demand from both traditional institutional buyers and digital-dollar issuers reinforces their central role in financial markets.
    • The growing USD stablecoin ecosystem may create opportunities for companies involved in custody, liquidity provision, and compliant digital payment infrastructure, including firms such as Circle Internet FinancialCoinbasePayPalFiservVisa, and Mastercard.
    • Financial institutions and fintech platforms operating at the intersection of blockchain settlement and regulatory compliance may also play a key role in this emerging architecture, including JPMorgan ChaseBank of New York MellonCitigroupBlock Inc., and Stripe Inc..

    The United States Dollar is not fading away—it is adapting and transforming. In many ways, USD stablecoins could act as the bridge between the traditional financial system and the emerging digital economy. As regulatory frameworks and financial technology continue to develop, these digital dollars are increasingly supported by the credibility of U.S. sovereign credit.

    For investors prepared to position themselves for this shift, the opportunity lies in recognizing how the dollar’s role is evolving. The story is not about the collapse of the dollar system, but about the digitization and expansion of dollar dominance in the next era of global finance.

    Sources: Lance Roberts

  • The initial economic effects of the Iran war remain limited, but the potential risks to the global economy are increasing.

    So far, the economic impact of the war involving Iran has been limited for the United States. However, if the conflict continues, its consequences are expected to become more visible over time. The primary concerns are slower economic growth and rising inflation, largely due to higher energy prices. Although it is still too early to accurately gauge the full impact, the economic cost is likely to increase as the war—now approaching its first week—continues.

    Because economic indicators are released with delays, the effects may not immediately appear in official data. For example, even if the conflict lasts through the end of March, its influence may be difficult to detect in the upcoming first-quarter GDP report.

    The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta projected on March 2 that U.S. first-quarter GDP could grow by about 3.0%, representing a strong recovery from the 1.4% growth recorded in the fourth quarter. While this estimate may change before the official April 30 release, the war’s effect may remain limited since the conflict began near the end of the quarter.

    Recent February data also suggests the U.S. economy remains resilient. According to ADP, private employers added 63,000 jobs, the largest monthly increase since July. At the same time, the Institute for Supply Management reported that its Services Index climbed to the strongest expansion reading in nearly four years.

    The outlook for the second quarter appears more uncertain. Officials from both the U.S. and Israel have indicated the war could last several weeks, which could amplify inflation pressures and slow economic momentum. Although the full scale of these effects remains unclear, financial markets have already begun to reflect a more cautious outlook compared with expectations before the conflict began.

    One noticeable shift involves expectations for monetary policy. Interest rate cuts that investors previously anticipated for June are now considered unlikely. Current market pricing suggests that September is the earliest point when a rate reduction may occur.

    Earlier this week, Beth Hammack, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, advocated for maintaining interest rates at current levels for an extended period. She noted that economic activity appears to be strengthening in the first quarter, and uncertainty about inflation linked to the war further supports the case for holding policy steady. She emphasized the need for clearer evidence that inflation is moving toward the central bank’s target before considering rate cuts.

    Meanwhile, U.S. Treasury yields have stayed relatively stable since the conflict began, remaining within the range seen in recent months. However, markets are increasingly pricing in the possibility of higher inflation. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is highly sensitive to monetary policy expectations, has risen each day this week, reaching 3.59% on Thursday.

    Bond yields are likely to keep rising until there are clear indications that the war is easing, even if it has not fully ended. At the moment, however, the outlook suggests the conflict could intensify in the near term rather than subside.

    According to a report from the Financial Times this morning, Qatar—the world’s second-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas—warned that the war could halt energy shipments from the Persian Gulf “within days.”

    Saad al-Kaabi, Qatar’s energy minister, cautioned that such a scenario could have severe global consequences. He suggested that a prolonged conflict lasting several weeks would weigh on worldwide GDP growth. Energy prices would surge across countries, supply shortages could emerge, and disruptions in production chains might occur as factories struggle to obtain necessary inputs.

    Is this an exaggeration? Possibly. Yet with each passing day that the war continues and pressure on Gulf energy infrastructure grows, it becomes increasingly difficult to argue that the economic fallout will remain limited.

    Sources: James Picerno

  • Iran conflict drives U.S. crude oil futures up 12% per barrel

    U.S. crude oil futures surged on Friday as the widening U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran disrupted global oil supply expectations.

    Brent crude settled at $92.69 per barrel, rising $7.28 or 8.5%, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) climbed $9.89, or 12.2%, to close at $90.90 per barrel.

    On a weekly basis, WTI jumped 35.6% and Brent gained about 27%, marking their strongest weekly advances since the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020.

    For the second straight day, U.S. crude futures outperformed Brent as refiners around the world rushed to secure alternative oil supplies to offset potential disruptions from the Middle East.

    According to UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo, refiners and trading firms are actively seeking substitute barrels, with the United States — the world’s largest oil producer — emerging as a key supplier.

    Janiv Shah, vice president of oil analytics at Rystad Energy, noted that several factors contributed to the wider gains in WTI compared with Brent. Strong refinery activity supported by attractive refining margins, along with favorable arbitrage opportunities for shipments to Europe, helped drive demand for U.S. crude.

    Could oil exceed $100?

    Qatar’s energy minister warned in an interview with the Financial Times that Gulf energy producers might halt exports within weeks if the conflict escalates further. Such a move, he suggested, could push oil prices as high as $150 per barrel.

    John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital, said the situation is increasingly alarming. “The worst-case scenario is unfolding right in front of us,” Kilduff said, adding that forecasts of oil reaching $100 per barrel now appear increasingly realistic.

    Oil prices began their sharp rally after the United States and Israel carried out strikes on Iran last Saturday, which prompted Iran to halt tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

    Around 20% of the world’s daily oil supply normally passes through this key shipping route. With the strait effectively closed for seven days, roughly 140 million barrels of crude — equivalent to about 1.4 days of global demand — have been prevented from reaching international markets.

    The conflict has expanded across major energy-producing regions in the Middle East, disrupting production and forcing several refineries and liquefied natural gas facilities to shut down.

    UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said oil prices are likely to continue rising for as long as the strait remains closed. He noted that markets previously believed U.S. President Donald Trump might eventually scale back the conflict to avoid higher oil prices, but the longer the situation persists, the greater the perceived supply risk becomes.

    In an interview with Reuters on Thursday, Trump said he was not worried about rising gasoline prices in the United States linked to the conflict, commenting that “if they rise, they rise.”

    Earlier on Friday, oil prices briefly dropped by more than 1% after speculation that the U.S. Treasury Department might take steps to counter the surge in energy costs.

    On Thursday, the Treasury issued waivers allowing companies to purchase sanctioned Russian oil. The first approvals were granted to Indian refiners, which have since bought millions of barrels of Russian crude.

    Sources: Erwin Seba

  • The dollar declined following a weak jobs report but still recorded its strongest weekly gain since August.

    The U.S. dollar weakened on Friday after a disappointing jobs report increased expectations that the Federal Reserve could cut interest rates. Nevertheless, the currency was still on track for a strong weekly gain, supported by rising demand for safe-haven assets amid escalating tensions in the Middle East.

    By 16:30 ET (21:30 GMT), the Dollar Index — which measures the dollar against six major currencies — had fallen 0.4% to 98.89. Despite the decline, it remained poised for a weekly rise of about 1.3%, its strongest performance since August 2025.

    Dollar pressured by weak payroll data

    Markets focused on the February nonfarm payrolls report released Friday. The data showed the U.S. economy lost 92,000 jobs last month, far below economists’ expectations for a gain of 58,000. At the same time, the unemployment rate increased slightly to 4.4%.

    The weak February figure followed a stronger January reading of 126,000 jobs, revised down from 130,000. December’s employment data was also revised lower, shifting from a gain of 48,000 to a loss of 17,000 jobs.

    Following the report, traders increased their expectations that the Federal Reserve may cut interest rates. Since higher rates typically support the dollar while lower rates weaken it, the data weighed on the currency.

    However, despite Friday’s pullback, the dollar benefited throughout the week from its safe-haven status as geopolitical tensions intensified in the Middle East.

    U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Thursday that U.S. firepower directed toward Iran could increase significantly. Meanwhile, Israel announced earlier Friday that it had begun a large-scale wave of strikes targeting infrastructure in Tehran.

    Iran retaliated by launching attacks against Israel and several regional countries including Gulf states, Cyprus, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, expanding the scope of the conflict.

    Analysts at ING said the dollar is unlikely to resume a sustained decline unless a meaningful political breakthrough leads to a ceasefire. Until then, governments will likely continue grappling with the economic consequences of elevated energy prices. The Dollar Index is now approaching the key psychological level of 100.

    According to Trade Nation senior market analyst David Morrison, the 100 level represents an important technical resistance point. The index repeatedly tested this level in November but failed to break through before eventually falling to a four-year low at the end of January.

    At that time, some traders speculated the dollar’s decline could continue amid concerns it might eventually lose its role as the world’s primary reserve currency. Morrison said those predictions now appear premature, although the Dollar Index still faces several significant resistance levels.

    Euro heads for weekly decline

    In Europe, EUR/USD was mostly unchanged at 1.1611, though the euro was on track to lose about 1.7% for the week as higher energy costs weighed on economic growth prospects in the region.

    Eurozone GDP data due later in the session is expected to confirm growth of 0.3% in the final quarter of last year and annual expansion of 1.3%.

    Earlier data also showed eurozone inflation in February came in higher than expected, even before the outbreak of the Iran conflict.

    Despite the geopolitical developments, European Central Bank policymaker and Dutch central bank chief Olaf Sleijpen said the eurozone’s monetary policy environment remains relatively stable.

    Speaking in an interview Friday, he noted that while the situation is no longer ideal, he has not significantly changed his overall assessment of the region’s economic position.

    Meanwhile, GBP/USD rose 0.3% to 1.3393, although sterling was still on track for a weekly decline of around 0.8% as rising energy prices add further pressure on the U.K. economy and government.

    Yen weakens amid rising oil prices

    In Asia, USD/JPY increased 0.2% to 157.83 and was on track for a weekly gain of 1.1%. The Japanese yen remained under pressure as higher oil prices raise inflation risks for energy-importing economies such as Japan.

    Bank of Japan Deputy Governor Ryozo Himino told parliament that the weaker yen is pushing up import costs and could influence underlying inflation.

    USD/CNY rose 0.1% to 6.8965 and was also heading for weekly gains, following a week in which Chinese authorities announced their lowest economic growth target since 1991.

    Meanwhile, AUD/USD climbed 0.3% to 0.7026, though the Australian dollar was still set for a weekly loss of about 1.3%, as risk-sensitive currencies remained under pressure.

    Sources: Anuron Mitra

  • Exclusive: Trump says the U.S. should have a say in choosing Iran’s next leader.

    U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters on Thursday that the United States should play a role in determining Iran’s next leader, adding that it would be “great” if Iranian Kurdish fighters based in Iraq crossed into Iran to attack government security forces.

    In a phone interview, Trump said he believes the successor to the late Ali Khamenei is unlikely to be Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, who had been considered a leading candidate after his father was killed in a military strike at the beginning of the war.

    “We’ll need to select that individual together with Iran,” Trump said, emphasizing that Washington must be involved in the decision.

    The president also voiced support for Iranian Kurdish forces launching attacks against Iranian security forces. His comments came six days after the United States and Israel began strikes on Iran, a conflict that has killed more than 1,000 people—including at least six U.S. service members—and destabilized the wider Middle East.

    “I think it would be great if they did that—I fully support it,” Trump said regarding Kurdish fighters.

    Discussing Iran’s leadership transition, Trump compared the situation to Venezuela, where U.S. intervention removed Nicolás Maduro earlier in the year, leaving his deputy Delcy Rodríguez in power—a development Trump praised.

    Trump said the United States wants to help shape Iran’s future leadership so the country does not repeatedly return to conflict every few years. He added that Washington hopes a new leader would benefit both the Iranian people and the nation as a whole.

    After saying that Mojtaba Khamenei, who had been viewed as a leading contender to succeed his father, was unlikely to become Iran’s next leader, Donald Trump did not provide further details.

    When asked whether the exiled Iranian crown prince Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s last shah, could be considered for the role, Trump replied that all possibilities were still open, noting that the situation remained in its early stages.

    Openness to Kurdish involvement

    Responding to a question about whether the United States might provide air support for Iranian Kurdish forces considering an operation in western Iran, Trump declined to give a direct answer but suggested that their goal would be victory.

    “If they decide to move forward with it, that’s fine,” he said.

    According to three sources familiar with the matter, Iranian Kurdish militias have recently been in discussions with the United States about the possibility—and the strategy—of launching attacks on Iranian security forces in the country’s western regions.

    The coalition of Iranian Kurdish groups, based along the Iran-Iraq border in the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region, has reportedly been preparing for such an operation. Their aim would be to weaken Iran’s military while U.S. and Israeli strikes continue targeting sites across the country.

    Trump also expressed confidence that the strategic shipping corridor known as the Strait of Hormuz would remain open.

    Damage and energy market pressure

    Iran has threatened to shut the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow passage between Iran and Oman—through which roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies pass.

    Shipping activity through the vital energy route has already slowed sharply after Iranian attacks struck six vessels, raising concerns about disruptions to global energy markets.

    “They don’t really have a navy anymore—their fleet is essentially destroyed,” said Donald Trump, adding that he is monitoring the situation in the Strait of Hormuz very closely.

    As the conflict intensified on Thursday, additional oil tankers were attacked in Gulf waters. At the same time, Iranian drones reportedly crossed into Azerbaijan, raising fears that the crisis could expand to involve more energy-producing regions. Since the fighting began, global oil prices have surged.

    Trump said he was not worried about the rise in gasoline prices, arguing that they would likely fall quickly once the conflict ends. He added that even if fuel costs increase temporarily, the broader strategic issues at stake are far more important.

    The president declined to estimate how long the war might continue but said events were progressing quickly and with greater force than many had anticipated. He added that, in his view, the conflict was unfolding faster and more decisively than expected.

    Sources: Reuters

  • USD/CAD edges lower within its range, drifting toward 1.3650.

    • USD/CAD remains rangebound with a slight bearish tilt
    • Momentum indicators continue to signal consolidation

    USD/CAD is still under pressure, trading within the range that has persisted since mid-February. The pair is confined between the 20-day and 50-day simple moving averages (SMAs), fluctuating within the narrow 1.3645–1.3700 zone. While the Canadian dollar faces pressure from a stronger US dollar, it is finding some support as rising oil prices—driven by the ongoing Middle East tensions—provide underlying demand.

    Technical indicators highlight the subdued market conditions seen in recent weeks. The RSI is hovering around the neutral 50 level, reflecting a lack of strong momentum, while the MACD is clustering near its zero line and signal line, suggesting limited potential for a near-term upward move.

    Recently, the pair has been drifting toward the lower end of the range after multiple rejections at the short-term descending trendline. Immediate support lies at the 20-day SMA around 1.3645, just above the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the November–January decline at 1.3635. A drop below these levels could open the door to further support at 1.3575, followed by the four-month low near 1.3471, last recorded in late January.

    On the upside, a clear break above the 50-day SMA and the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement around 1.3730—where the short-term descending trendline converges—could shift the outlook to a more bullish tone. Such a breakout would pave the way for a move toward the 200-day SMA near 1.3809, which aligns with the 50% Fibonacci retracement level. Notably, the 200-day SMA recently formed a death cross with the 50-day SMA, reinforcing the technical resistance against a sustained upward move.

    Overall, USD/CAD is showing fading momentum as it drifts closer to the lower boundary of its multi-week consolidation range, with the earlier rebound from the four-month low beginning to lose steam. Although the broader downward trend is still in place, downside pressure may remain contained as long as the pair stays above the 20-day SMA.

  • Silver: Time cycles suggest a breakout as major resistance levels come into view.

    Time-cycle analysis suggests the market is approaching an important reversal window between March 6 and March 9, followed by a secondary expansion phase from March 13 to March 16. Historically, silver tends to produce strong directional moves when periods of volatility compression align with these harmonic time cycles.

    The recent consolidation within the $81–$85 range indicates the market is absorbing liquidity after the sharp volatility spike seen earlier in the week. If prices remain supported above the $81–$83 zone, the next major resistance cluster is expected between $90 and $97, an area that aligns with previous structural highs as well as the VC PMI Weekly Sell 1 level. A decisive break above this region could ignite a fresh volatility expansion, potentially resembling past major rallies in silver.

    Silver futures are trading around $83.35, stabilizing after an intense bout of volatility that drove prices down from a $97.30 high to $78.06 in just two trading sessions. This roughly $19 price swing over a short period represents a classic volatility expansion phase, which historically tends to be followed by strong directional moves once the market completes its mean-reversion process.

    According to the VC PMI framework, the Daily Mean is positioned near $83.50, a level the market is currently attempting to reclaim. A sustained close above this point could trigger bullish momentum, with upside targets at the Daily Sell 1 level around $86.43 and the Weekly Buy 1 level near $87.31.

    From a structural perspective, the drop from $97.30 appears to have completed a corrective harmonic retracement pattern, testing several key Fibonacci levels including the 61.8%, 50%, and 38.2% retracements shown on the chart. Ultimately, prices found support slightly below the Weekly Buy 2 level near $81.34, reinforcing the 95% probability mean-reversion zone identified by the VC PMI model when price deviates significantly from its statistical mean.

    The time-cycle analysis indicates that silver is nearing a crucial short-term reversal window between March 6 and March 9, followed by another notable cycle expansion phase from March 13 to March 16. These cycles are derived from harmonic timing patterns that often coincide with liquidity shifts in futures markets. When such timing windows align with prices trading close to VC PMI support zones, the likelihood of a directional reversal tends to increase significantly.

    Using W.D. Gann’s Square-of-9 geometry, the recent high at $97.30 marks a significant harmonic pivot within the current market cycle. The subsequent pullback toward the $78–$81 region aligns closely with a rotational angle on the Square-of-9 grid, suggesting that the market may have completed a geometric correction before attempting to resume upward momentum.

    Key harmonic resistance levels derived from the Square-of-9 now cluster around $90, $93, and $97, which closely correspond with the VC PMI Sell 1 and Sell 2 resistance zones.

    If prices continue to hold above the $81–$83 support area, silver could enter a new expansion phase targeting the $90–$97 region during the next cycle window. Historically, volatility expansion phases in precious metals often precede strong upside moves, and the tightening price structure within the current consolidation suggests that a breakout may develop as the market approaches mid-March.

    Sources: Patrick MontesDeOca

  • S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Russell 2000: Ranges Hold Despite Pullback, but Breakdown Risk Builds

    Trading volume has begun to increase, with selling pressure dominating, though the market has not yet confirmed the start of a new downtrend. While news headlines suggest a more severe market deterioration, price action has not fully validated that narrative so far.

    The Russell 2000 (IWM) has gradually drifted toward range support, forming a series of lower highs but still avoiding lower lows. This tightening structure could eventually resolve with a decisive bearish breakdown—likely marked by a strong red candlestick—which would present a potential short opportunity targeting the 200-day moving average.

    If that level is reached, the technical outlook would likely shift to a net-negative stance. At that point, the market could begin to reveal whether a broader bearish trend is developing.

    The S&P 500 is also approaching the lower boundary of its trading range, though it still has the early-week spike low acting as a reference level. Trading volume in recent sessions has remained relatively modest, but the broader technical picture has turned negative, highlighted by a newly formed downtrend in On-Balance Volume (OBV).

    When prices move back toward a spike low, markets often break below that level if the session ultimately closes within the spike range. A decisive drop below 6,800 would therefore create a potential short setup, with risk managed by placing a stop on a daily close back above 6,800.

    The equal-weighted S&P 500 may provide clearer insight into the market’s direction. It recently registered a clear trend break and has since completed two successful retests of its 50-day moving average. Given how frequently this level has been tested, a third retest would not be surprising—and that attempt could potentially lead to a breakdown below the 50-day MA.

    Technical indicators currently present a mixed picture. For the time being, the most reasonable interpretation is that the index remains in a trading range, similar to the consolidation pattern observed in the market-cap-weighted S&P 500.

    The Nasdaq is showing slightly better resilience compared with other major indices. Yesterday’s volume was classified as accumulation, indicating some buying interest. However, the 20-day moving average is currently acting as resistance and is quickly converging with range support and the 200-day moving average.

    This tightening price structure suggests a potential volatility squeeze, which is likely to lead to a sharp breakout. Once that move occurs, traders can look to position themselves in the direction of the breakout.

    Bitcoin has made an initial move higher, successfully breaking above its 20-day moving average. Although prices have pulled back slightly since the breakout, the move remains intact and has not yet threatened the bullish shift.

    The next upside target is the 50-day moving average, followed by the $85,000 level, which is likely to align with a test of the 200-day moving average.

    Potential short opportunities are beginning to emerge, but with markets still confined to trading ranges, entering positions too early carries a high risk of whipsaws. For the time being, bullish traders may find Bitcoin to be the more stable long setup, as it continues to hold above its recent breakout level.

    Sources: Declan Fallon

  • Managed futures may underperform if the Iran shock results in erratic market conditions.

    Managed futures strategies—often referred to as Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) or trend-followers—are built to perform best in environments where major macroeconomic shifts generate sustained trends across equities, bonds, commodities, and currencies. With geopolitical tensions rising due to the conflict involving Iran, the current market environment may become a significant test for these strategies.

    Current Positioning

    Using the SG Trend Indicator from Societe Generale Prime Services as a proxy for industry positioning, the latest asset-class exposures are outlined below. It should be noted that actual exposures may vary depending on each manager’s contract selection and portfolio construction methodology. The SG Trend Indicator generates signals based on a 20-day versus 120-day moving average crossover, with position sizes increasing the longer the signal persists, while still being adjusted for expected volatility.

    • Equities: Aside from a short position in NASDAQ futures, positioning remains long across both U.S. and developed international equity markets.
    • Commodities: Long positions are held in precious and base metals, crude oil, and livestock contracts, while short exposure is concentrated in agricultural commodities such as coffee, cocoa, and cotton.
    • Bonds: Positioning is mixed across regions and maturities. There is a short position in the middle segment of the U.S. Treasury curve, though overall directional exposure remains relatively limited.
    • Currencies: Long positions are held in the euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, and Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, while the U.S. dollar is long against the Japanese yen.

    Potential Impact of Rising Geopolitical Risk

    Historically, periods of heightened geopolitical tension tend to trigger a flight to safe-haven assets, broad risk-off sentiment, and sharp increases in energy prices. Based on the positioning outlined above, the potential implications may include:

    • Equities: If equity markets continue to decline, current long exposure could weigh on performance in the near term. However, since trend signals remain relatively moderate, a deeper or more prolonged sell-off could eventually shift positioning toward net short exposure.
    • Commodities: Crude oil prices have already moved sharply higher, which supports the existing long positioning in energy markets.
    • Bonds: Demand for government bonds—particularly U.S. Treasuries—typically rises during periods of market stress. With current exposure across Treasuries relatively balanced between long and short positions, changes in investor demand along the yield curve could influence future positioning.
    • Currencies: A move toward traditional safe-haven currencies could put pressure on strategies currently holding short U.S. dollar exposure in the short term.

    Key Takeaway

    The conflict involving Iran has injected significant macro uncertainty and volatility into global markets. For managed futures strategies, such conditions highlight their role in providing dynamic diversification through both long and short exposure across equity, bond, currency, and commodity futures markets.

    In the near term, gains are likely to be supported by existing long exposure to energy markets. However, long equity positions and short U.S. dollar exposure may act as a drag on returns. For managed futures to generate meaningful crisis alpha, sustained price trends are essential. Without persistent directional moves, strategies may face whipsaw conditions where signals frequently reverse—an environment that tends to be particularly challenging for the industry.

    Within the managed futures space, maintaining a diversified allocation across sub-strategies remains important. These may include short-term momentum, volatility breakout systems, pattern-recognition models, and traditional trend-following approaches. Additional diversification across markets and time horizons within trend-following strategies is also recommended.

    Sources: Adam Turnquist

  • War Has Shifted Market Leadership Back to Traditional Industries — But Will It Last?

    The conflict in Iran has reshaped expectations about which sectors will benefit or struggle in the U.S. stock market, steering investment toward energy, materials, and industrial companies. How long this shift in market leadership continues will largely depend on the war’s trajectory and duration. For now, however, traditional “old-economy” stocks have regained popularity among investors.

    Rising oil and natural gas prices have propelled energy stocks to the top of sector performance rankings. According to ETF data through yesterday’s close (March 4), the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund has climbed more than 25% so far this year. In comparison, the broader market, represented by the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, has delivered almost no growth, posting only a modest gain of about 0.5% in 2026.

    Materials and industrial stocks rank a distant second and third in sector performance this year, followed by consumer staples, utilities, and real estate. Most of the other sectors are either hovering around flat levels or showing losses. Financials have performed the worst so far, declining about 6% since the start of the year.

    However, this shift in investor sentiment may not last long, depending on how the conflict develops. Many analysts believe the war could end relatively soon. If that happens, today’s leading sectors might give up their gains as investors rotate back toward themes tied to artificial intelligence and the digital economy.

    That outcome remains uncertain. The joint U.S. and Israeli strike on Iran has already proven to be more than a swift, targeted operation. With the conflict now entering its fifth day, the chances of a near-term resolution appear increasingly slim.

    Both the United States and Israel have indicated publicly that the conflict could extend for several weeks and may even become a prolonged war. On Wednesday, senior Pentagon officials cautioned that the situation could evolve into a longer confrontation, stressing that the fighting is “far from over.” U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested the conflict might continue for up to eight weeks.

    A senior Israeli military officer echoed this view, noting that preparations are being made for a conflict that could last several weeks.

    How long the war continues will be a crucial factor shaping investor risk appetite and the direction of financial markets. According to Rick de los Reyes, a sector portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price, if disruptions prove brief, past experience shows that price spikes driven by geopolitical tensions often fade once uncertainty subsides. However, if production or exports are disrupted for an extended period, it could create a genuine supply shock with significant consequences for inflation, interest rate expectations, and global economic growth.

    As a result, the outlook for inflation, economic activity, interest rates, and which sectors lead or lag in markets remains highly uncertain. For now, the only clear reality is that no one knows how the conflict will develop or where it will ultimately lead. While several scenarios appear plausible on paper, the eventual outcome will likely challenge many of today’s predictions once the fighting ends.

    Sources: James Picerno

  • Is the S&P 500 Entering a Distribution Phase? Key Signals Traders Should Monitor

    Key Takeaways

    U.S. large-cap stocks slipped to multi-month lows this week as oil prices surged, although dip buyers quickly stepped in. A modest rotation across sectors is giving bulls some optimism ahead of upcoming earnings releases and key economic data. Meanwhile, potential distribution in SPY and consolidation in the U.S. dollar could serve as important signals for market direction.

    As the week progresses, traders may finally shift their attention away from geopolitical tensions. Following the release of the Beige Book on Wednesday afternoon, Broadcom reported earnings. The semiconductor firm—less highlighted than the “Magnificent Seven”—has been under pressure like many peers, currently about 25% below its December record high of $413. After four consecutive declining sessions, a rebound would provide some relief for the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, which tracks the chip sector.

    Chip and Consumer Earnings Shift Focus

    Upcoming earnings from Marvell Technology and Costco Wholesale will further influence market sentiment. Marvell’s results could add to volatility in semiconductor stocks, while Costco’s report may offer new insight into the strength of the consumer.

    Looking more closely at Costco, bullish signals are beginning to emerge after a difficult second half of 2025. The consumer-staples retailer fell sharply from $1,067 last June to a 16-month low in December, marking its first series of 52-week lows since March 2009.

    Currently, however, the stock has recovered above its long-term 200-day moving average as well as its rising 50-day average. A bullish “golden cross” could soon form just as the company releases its fiscal Q2 results. A positive reaction to the earnings report would likely be viewed as an encouraging sign for the broader economy. While consumer staples are typically considered defensive, Costco’s performance is closely tied to middle- and upper-income consumer spending and it has historically been a major leader during long-term bull markets.

    It’s the Market Reaction That Matters, Not the Data

    At the moment, a pullback in that group would be unwelcome, especially as stocks such as American Express (NYSE: AXP) are already showing potential warning signals. What matters most won’t simply be the revenue and earnings figures released on Thursday evening, but how the stock responds when trading resumes on Friday. In the end, investors’ reactions to fundamental data often carry more weight than the data itself.

    Economic Data Takes Center Stage

    With that in mind, Friday morning’s focus will shift toward domestic economic indicators rather than the ongoing concerns surrounding the Middle East conflict, including tensions near the Strait of Hormuz, drone and missile strikes, and the possibility of crude oil prices climbing above $100 per barrel for WTI and Brent.

    In fact, something unusual is set to occur: the February Employment Situation report and the January Retail Sales report are scheduled to be released at the same time. Key questions remain—how strong will the headline job gains be? Will consumer spending confirm a solid start to the year? For now, it’s uncertain.

    Friday Risk Sentiment and Sector Trends

    What should become clearer, however, is traders’ appetite for risk as the weekend approaches. Market behavior at the close of the first week of the month—especially with the VIX nearing the 30 level—may provide clues about how the remainder of the first quarter could unfold. Will markets experience heightened volatility, or will conditions calm after March’s turbulent start? Instead of speculating, the charts may offer the answers.

    Sector movements have stood out this week. Despite sharp volatility in Energy and other cyclical industries, the Financials (XLF) sector has still managed to generate modest outperformance. That’s an encouraging sign for bullish investors, considering banks and related stocks have been among the market’s leaders since October 2022. At the same time, Energy (XLE) and Utilities (XLU) have continued to rank among the top performers over the past six trading sessions.

    However, two sectors trailing behind are Health Care (XLV) and Consumer Staples (XLP). This suggests there hasn’t been a complete shift into defensive assets even as the VIX has climbed. It’s worth noting that the S&P 500 (SPY) has only slipped slightly since February 23, which may hint at a somewhat healthier sector backdrop. By the market close on Friday, we should have a clearer picture of the trend.

    SPY: Bulls and Bears Still Battling

    Looking at the bigger picture, the SPY still appears somewhat fragile. A bearish rounded-top pattern seems to be forming, and the price has slipped below the 100-day moving average. While this moving average isn’t always a primary indicator, it has acted as a fairly reliable support and resistance level over the past two years.

    That said, the bulls have shown resilience this week. U.S. large-cap stocks rebounded significantly from their lows on both Monday and Tuesday. However, the sharp volatility and heavy trading volumes mean a large amount of shares have changed hands between roughly $670 (Tuesday’s low) and the record high just under $700 set on January 28. For technical analysts, that kind of activity often signals distribution.

    Typically, bullish investors prefer to see tight consolidation rather than price structures that stretch out over several months. The concern is that major market participants could be gradually selling shares after a long rally. In other words, traders should remain cautious—especially with potential distribution patterns emerging as March unfolds.

    The Dollar’s Rally: Why It Matters

    From an intermarket standpoint, the US Dollar Index ($USD) should remain a key indicator to watch for the rest of the quarter. Earlier this week, it moved into the important 99.50–100.50 range but was initially pushed back. Now trading below 99 ahead of major economic releases, a move toward 10-month highs above 100.39 would likely signal a broader risk-off environment in financial markets.

    The latest rebound followed what appears to have been a bullish false breakdown, occurring when market sentiment toward the dollar had become excessively negative. To put things into perspective, it’s quite rare for the dollar to remain trapped in such a tight trading range for an extended period.

    Once the index eventually breaks out or breaks down, the move could carry significant consequences across global asset markets—from equities to commodities and currencies. For the moment, however, the situation remains a wait-and-see one as traders watch for a decisive shift.

    The Bottom Line

    March volatility has arrived as expected. Geopolitical tensions have intensified, yet the S&P 500 continues to show resilience. With several key earnings reports and important economic data releases approaching, the market’s reaction heading into the weekend will likely provide the clearest signal for traders.

    At the very least, attention may briefly shift away from geopolitical developments. For now, the key areas to monitor include evolving sector trends, the months-long consolidation in the S&P 500, and the range-bound movement of the US Dollar Index. Together, these factors could offer important clues about the market’s next direction.

    Sources: Mike Zaccardi

  • The dollar rises slightly as the Middle East conflict increases demand for safe-haven assets

    The U.S. dollar resumed its upward movement on Thursday after briefly pulling back from a three-month high, as ongoing tensions in the Middle East unsettled investors and increased demand for the safe-haven currency.

    Initial optimism about a possible easing of the conflict quickly faded, replaced by renewed uncertainty after Iran warned that Washington would “bitterly regret” the sinking of an Iranian warship near Sri Lanka.

    As a result, the dollar remained strong, with the euro slipping 0.18% to $1.1610 and the British pound falling 0.1% to $1.3358. The dollar index, which tracks the greenback against six major currencies, rose 0.18% to 98.99.

    Nick Rees, head of macro research at Monex, said investors are struggling with limited clarity about the geopolitical outlook. He noted that markets currently react strongly even to minor headlines because confidence about future developments is low.

    While geopolitical turmoil usually pushes investors toward safe assets, concerns about rising inflation have complicated the picture. Some traditional safe havens have behaved unpredictably, forcing investors to reconsider which assets truly provide protection.

    Germany’s 10-year Bund yield, the eurozone benchmark, climbed 6.1 basis points to 2.807% on Thursday as bond prices declined.

    Limited safe havens

    Bas van Geffen, senior macro strategist at Rabobank, said investors appear to have few clear safe options. Even assets like gold are not responding in their usual way. Instead, the sharp rise in the dollar index suggests that dollar liquidity is currently the dominant refuge.

    So far this week, the dollar has gained nearly 1.37%, standing out as one of the few assets to benefit during several volatile trading sessions that have pressured stocks, bonds, and occasionally even precious metals.

    The surge in energy prices triggered by the Middle East conflict has also revived concerns that inflation could return, potentially disrupting expectations for interest rate cuts from major central banks.

    Traders now see only a 31.5% probability that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates in June, down from roughly 46% a week earlier, according to the CME FedWatch tool. Part of this shift reflects stronger-than-expected U.S. economic data released on Wednesday.

    Expectations for rate cuts from the Bank of England have also been reduced, while markets are increasingly betting that the European Central Bank could raise interest rates as early as this year.

    Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group, said central bankers are increasingly worried about the return of inflation. He added that U.S. rate expectations could change significantly in 2026 if global inflation accelerates again due to energy supply constraints.

    The Japanese yen also gave up earlier gains and was last trading 0.2% weaker at 157.35 per dollar.

    Meanwhile, China set its 2026 economic growth target between 4.5% and 5%, slightly lower than last year’s 5% growth. The target leaves room for more efforts to reduce industrial overcapacity and rebalance the economy, though not aggressively.

    The Chinese yuan recovered from a one-month low to trade roughly unchanged at 6.8951 per dollar after the People’s Bank of China set its daily reference rate at the strongest level in nearly three years.

    In the cryptocurrency market, both bitcoin and ether declined by less than 1% following strong gains in the previous trading session.

    Sources: Reuters

  • Oil prices jump over 3% as widening Iran conflict raises supply concerns

    Oil prices climbed more than 3% on Thursday, extending their rally as the escalating conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran disrupted energy supplies and shipping routes. The tensions prompted some major producers to reduce output while others took steps to secure supply. Brent crude rose $2.64, or 3.2%, to $84.04 per barrel by 1425 GMT, marking a fifth straight session of gains, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) increased $3.35, or 4.5%, to $78.01.

    The premium of prompt Brent futures over the six-month contract approached its widest level since July 2022, signaling tighter global supply. Renewed tanker attacks in the Gulf and China’s move to curb fuel exports also supported prices, according to UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo, who noted that refined fuel markets are showing stress due to reduced Middle East exports. Some refineries in the Middle East, China, and India have shut crude units amid the conflict, while European diesel futures surged to their highest level since October 2022 at $1,130 per tonne.

    Attacks on oil tankers continued in the Gulf, including damage to the Bahamas-flagged tanker Sonangol Namibe near Iraq’s Khor al Zubair port. Around 300 tankers remained stranded in the Strait of Hormuz as traffic through the vital chokepoint nearly halted. Natural gas prices also rose after Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that Russia could stop its remaining gas flows to Europe, while Qatar declared force majeure on LNG shipments. European gas prices at the Dutch TTF hub for April delivery climbed nearly 3% to around 50 euros per MWh, bringing gains since Friday to nearly 60%.

    Meanwhile, Iran launched missiles at Israel as the conflict entered its sixth day, following a U.S. submarine strike that sank an Iranian warship near Sri Lanka. Analysts at J.P. Morgan warned that oil supplies from Iraq and Kuwait could begin shutting down if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, potentially removing up to 3.3 million barrels per day from the market. Iraq has already reduced production by nearly 1.5 million barrels per day due to limited storage and export routes, while Qatar said it may take at least a month to restore normal LNG export levels.

    Sources: Enes Tunagur

  • Bitcoin edges higher to $72K, leading a broader crypto rally as risk appetite strengthens.

    Bitcoin edged higher on Thursday, stabilizing after a wave of regulatory optimism and improving market sentiment fueled recent gains in the world’s largest cryptocurrency, though concerns linked to the Iran conflict continued to weigh on markets. The digital asset rose 1.5% to $72,620 by 09:37 ET (14:37 GMT), after reaching a one-month peak of $73,243 on Wednesday.

    However, some gains were pared back as U.S. stock index futures turned negative Thursday morning, with ongoing tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran keeping investors cautious. Rising oil prices also intensified worries about the conflict’s potential inflationary effects.

    Bitcoin had surged on Wednesday, extending earlier weekly gains as a strong performance on Wall Street boosted risk appetite. Bargain buying also contributed to the rally following the cryptocurrency’s sharp losses in February. The market was further supported after U.S. President Donald Trump urged lawmakers to quickly pass a long-delayed crypto market framework bill and criticized major U.S. banking groups for opposing yield payments on stablecoins.

    His remarks fueled expectations that the industry could receive more favorable regulation in the U.S., although progress on the CLARITY Act—designed to establish a clear market structure for crypto—remains limited. Earlier optimism was also driven by reports suggesting Iran was seeking talks with Washington, raising hopes for de-escalation. However, Iran denied those reports and launched missile strikes on Israel early Thursday, dampening risk sentiment.

    Meanwhile, billionaire hedge fund manager Ray Dalio renewed his criticism of Bitcoin, arguing it should not be compared with gold because it lacks central bank backing, offers limited privacy, and could be vulnerable to advances in quantum computing. Speaking on a podcast, the Bridgewater Associates founder said Bitcoin remains small relative to gold as a monetary asset and questioned its reliability as a safe haven.

    Despite his skepticism, Dalio noted in 2025 that he maintains a 1% allocation to Bitcoin in his portfolio and previously suggested investors consider holding around 15% in either Bitcoin or gold amid concerns about the U.S. debt situation.

    In corporate news, Intercontinental Exchange—the owner of the New York Stock Exchange—acquired a minority stake in crypto exchange OKX in a deal valuing the platform at roughly $25 billion. As part of the agreement, ICE will license OKX’s spot crypto pricing data and intends to launch U.S.-regulated futures contracts tied to those prices.

    Subject to regulatory approval, ICE’s U.S. futures products and tokenized NYSE-listed equities could also become available on OKX’s platform. Financial terms of the investment were not disclosed, though ICE will receive a seat on OKX’s board.

    Across the broader crypto market, prices moved slightly higher on Thursday, following Bitcoin’s gains as the sector recovered part of last month’s losses. Ether rose about 2% to $2,123.34, while XRP gained more than 1% to $1.43. Solana, Cardano, and BNB also recorded modest increases. Among memecoins, Dogecoin traded flat, while the $TRUMP token declined around 2%.

    Sources: Ambar Warrick

  • Gold’s Parabolic Surge Eyes $5,850–$6,000 by April

    Gold futures are hovering around $5,185, validating a decisive breakout from a multi-year consolidation range and signaling what looks like the hyperbolic stage of the ongoing bull run. Based on VC PMI modeling and Square-of-9 harmonic projections, the next key resistance zone is projected between $5,400 and $5,850.

    Should upside momentum carry through the upcoming cycle window in late March, prices may stretch toward the $6,000 area by mid-April, where more substantial harmonic resistance is expected. The sharp upward angle of the moving averages reflects strong institutional participation, implying that any pullbacks are likely to represent brief consolidations within a broader bullish advance.

    On the monthly continuation chart, gold futures display one of the most pronounced structural rallies in precious metals history. Following years of range-bound trade between roughly $1,700 and $2,100, gold broke out in 2024 and has since accelerated into what can be characterized as a hyperbolic expansion phase.

    With prices now near $5,185—well above the primary moving-average framework—the technical backdrop confirms a robust momentum environment typical of the later stages of a long-term bull market.

    From a VC PMI mean-reversion standpoint, price action unfolds in oscillating waves around equilibrium. When the market stretches materially above its mean, it reflects powerful upside momentum—but also a rising likelihood of heightened volatility.

    On the current monthly timeframe, gold is trading well above its 9-month and 18-month moving averages. Historically, such extended positioning tends to occur during periods of accelerated institutional accumulation and heightened global monetary stress, conditions that often accompany the more explosive phases of a long-term bull cycle.

    Market Timing Windows

    Applying the VC PMI time-cycle framework alongside harmonic rhythm analysis, the following timing windows are anticipated for March and April:

    • March 7–10 – Initial volatility window where the market may pause or consolidate following the recent sharp advance.
    • March 18–22 – Secondary cycle pivot zone, a period that often reveals whether the trend resumes or shifts into corrective behavior.
    • March 27–31 – Key inflection window, coinciding with futures delivery dynamics and potential liquidity realignments.
    • April 12–18 – Major harmonic cycle window that could generate either a short-term peak or an accelerated continuation breakout.

    These timeframes should be viewed as probabilistic windows, not precise reversal dates. In hyperbolic market phases, price action often accelerates into projected cycle periods, followed by short-lived pullbacks before the broader uptrend resumes.

    Square-of-9 Harmonic Resistance

    Applying W.D. Gann’s Square-of-9 framework to prior breakout levels highlights the next key harmonic price objectives. Current projections indicate that gold is advancing toward a significant resistance band between $5,400 and $5,850.

    Should the market maintain monthly closes above the $5,400 threshold, the Square-of-9 model opens the door to the next harmonic cluster in the $6,000–$6,300 range—closely aligned with the broader cycle window projected into April.

    How price reacts at these geometric resistance zones—particularly in conjunction with the upcoming time-cycle windows—will help determine whether gold enters a temporary consolidation phase or continues its acceleration within a larger liquidity-driven advance.

    Structural Interpretation

    The pronounced upward slope of the moving averages confirms that gold is operating in the momentum stage of a secular bull market. Historically, such phases unfold during periods when global capital rotates toward hard assets amid currency debasement, geopolitical tension, and expanding sovereign debt burdens.

    Although intermittent pullbacks are normal in strong trends, the broader structure remains constructive as long as price holds above the monthly mean zone near $4,300–$4,400, which now serves as major structural support.

    Sources: Patrick MontesDeOca

  • Oil Tests Major Resistance as Hormuz Disruptions Rattle Global Crude Flows

    Oil markets are holding near the top of their recent trading band as participants factor in an added layer of logistical risk to global energy supply chains.

    Crude has rebounded toward the 76–77 zone after strong buying interest emerged around 72, where support formed amid renewed tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz. Concerns over tanker traffic and potential shipping bottlenecks prompted buyers to step in aggressively at that level.

    Although the market has not yet entered a full volatility breakout, recent price action indicates that crude is beginning to price in a geopolitical premium—driven less by outright production losses and more by uncertainty surrounding transportation routes.

    At this stage, oil appears to be recalibrating to elevated logistics risk rather than responding to an immediate supply shock.

    Hormuz Strains Redirect Market Focus to Supply Chain Risk

    Recent events surrounding the Strait of Hormuz have underscored that energy security depends not only on production levels, but also on the reliability of transport routes.

    Approximately one-fifth of the world’s traded crude moves through this narrow passage linking the Persian Gulf with the Indian Ocean. Even limited interruptions to traffic through the corridor can quickly spill over into freight markets, insurance costs, and tanker availability.

    Signs of mounting congestion and heightened caution among tanker operators have already driven freight rates higher, while insurers are reassessing war-risk premiums for ships crossing the region.

    Such bottlenecks may not immediately eliminate physical supply, but they can slow the circulation of oil through global networks. In commodity markets, logistical slowdowns frequently manifest as increased price volatility.

    Physical Flows Matter as Much as Production

    The current backdrop highlights a familiar theme in oil markets: disruptions to transportation networks can tighten supply perceptions even when overall output remains steady.

    When tanker routes are constrained, ships may need to reroute or wait offshore, effectively extending supply chains and temporarily shrinking available shipping capacity. That dynamic can create pockets of tightness at key delivery hubs, even if global stockpiles appear sufficient on paper.

    In recent trading sessions, this logistical dimension has become a more influential force in price formation. Market participants are increasingly monitoring tanker movements, port congestion, and freight costs as real-time signals of stress within the physical crude system.

    Consequently, oil is now trading not just on traditional supply-demand fundamentals, but also on the durability and flexibility of the infrastructure responsible for moving those barrels worldwide.

    Oil has staged a decisive rebound from the 72 region, marking a notable shift in short-term structure.

    From a technical standpoint, the Renko pattern reflects a clear momentum transition following the recent pullback. The 72 area emerged as a strong demand zone, where buyers stepped in forcefully after a run of declining bricks signaled waning downside pressure. That reversal sparked a steady advance, lifting crude back toward the top of its near-term trading range.

    Support has now rotated higher, clustering in the 75.0–74.7 band. This zone has functioned as a pivot throughout the latest consolidation phase and represents the first layer of defense should prices retrace.

    Beneath current levels, the more meaningful structural support remains around 72.1, which formed the foundation of the latest corrective phase.

    On the upside, the 76.3–76.8 range is shaping up as a key resistance corridor. Multiple rallies have stalled in that area, indicating that market participants are still weighing whether the prevailing geopolitical risk premium is strong enough to fuel a sustained breakout.

    For now, the broader pattern appears to reflect orderly consolidation after a sharp rebound, rather than the early stages of a renewed bearish trend.

    Momentum Signals Indicate a Mature Expansion Phase

    Momentum metrics reinforce the view that crude is moving out of a compression environment and into a more developed directional cycle.

    The ECRO profile remains elevated, hovering near the top of its historical range. This typically characterizes conditions where volatility has already expanded and the market is consolidating those gains, rather than initiating a fresh breakout. Meanwhile, stochastic momentum has rebounded toward its upper boundary after briefly easing during the recent pullback.

    Together, these signals imply that upside pressure remains intact, though the market may need additional consolidation before launching its next impulsive move. In essence, the current hesitation near resistance appears to reflect constructive digestion of prior gains, not a sign of trend exhaustion.

    Freight Markets Could Provide the Next Major Signal

    Looking ahead, shipping conditions in the Persian Gulf are likely to remain a critical variable for oil markets.

    If tanker congestion worsens or freight rates continue climbing, traders may begin assigning a higher logistical risk premium to crude. Transportation disruptions typically ripple through the system gradually, meaning their pricing impact often builds over time rather than materializing as a single abrupt shock.

    On the other hand, if shipping activity stabilizes and geopolitical tensions ease, a portion of the recently embedded premium could unwind. In that case, crude would likely shift back to trading primarily on macroeconomic drivers such as global demand expectations, currency fluctuations, and inventory trends.

    For now, however, freight dynamics remain a central component of the oil narrative.

    Outlook

    Crude is navigating a landscape shaped as much by transportation risk as by traditional supply fundamentals. The rebound from the 72 area reinforces the view that buyers are still active on pullbacks, while the consolidation around 76 indicates the market is assessing whether current geopolitical risks justify a sustained breakout.

    As long as prices remain above the 75–74.7 support zone, the near-term technical structure stays constructive. A clear push above 76.8 would signal renewed upside momentum and could pave the way for a broader expansion phase. Conversely, a decisive break below 74.7 would likely shift crude back into a wider consolidation pattern.

    At present, price action reflects a market recalibrating to elevated transportation risk rather than responding to a structural collapse in supply.

    Sources: Luca Mattei

  • Surging Energy Prices Spark Broad Currency Deleveraging

    Currency markets experienced a noticeable shift in tone yesterday, as the initial energy shock evolved into a broader wave of risk deleveraging amid rising cross-asset volatility. Such unwinds are typically brief but intense.

    Before rebuilding positions, investors will likely need reassurance—either through a moderation in energy prices or signals that central banks have room to ease policy.

    USD: Attention May Shift to U.S. Inflation and the Fed

    FX market drivers evolved yesterday. While Monday’s price action centered on the impact of elevated energy prices on importing versus exporting currencies, Tuesday brought a broader wave of deleveraging as cross-asset volatility surged. Equities sold off sharply—particularly financials—reflecting crowded overweight positioning in that sector.

    Concerns around private credit redemptions (including headlines tied to Blackstone and Blue Owl) appear secondary to the wider risk-off move, though they remain worth monitoring. More broadly, rising volatility and higher Value-at-Risk metrics have triggered position trimming across asset classes. In FX, this dynamic has supported the U.S. dollar, especially given that speculative positioning had been skewed short.

    Some of the dramatic overnight headlines—such as a 12% drop in South Korea’s Kospi—should also be viewed in context, following a roughly 50% rally year-to-date through February.

    Looking ahead, near-term risk sentiment will likely hinge on two variables: whether energy prices can ease—potentially if the Strait of Hormuz reopens more fully—and whether central banks can provide policy support rather than tighten further. Risk assets briefly stabilized after President Trump suggested naval convoy protection for shipping through the Strait and federal backing for maritime insurance. While constructive, markets will want tangible follow-through. For now, energy prices remain firm.

    On monetary policy, the inflationary implications of the energy shock have pushed short-end rate expectations higher. That hawkish repricing paused during yesterday’s equity slide, but absent another major sell-off, tighter short-end pricing appears to be the prevailing theme—another tailwind for the dollar.

    Today’s catalysts include the monthly ADP employment report; a reading near +50K would reinforce the view that labor market downside risks have diminished, supporting the Fed’s stance. Attention will also fall on the ISM services “prices paid” component—an elevated reading would bolster the dollar. Later, the Fed’s Beige Book ahead of the March 18 FOMC meeting could shape expectations further. Any signs of persistent price pressures may prompt markets to trim expectations for rate cuts. Currently, roughly 45 basis points of easing are priced in for the year.

    The dollar has posted strong gains this week on these dynamics, with DXY reaching as high as 99.68 yesterday. While investors may hesitate to chase it through the 100.00–100.35 highs seen over the past eight months, meaningful improvement in the energy backdrop may be required before short-dollar positioning regains traction.

    EUR: 1.1500 Could Mark the Floor of the Trading Range

    Heavy long positioning in the euro—particularly among asset managers—left EUR/USD exposed to downside pressure yesterday, with the pair touching a low of 1.1530. It is currently being weighed down by two forces: deteriorating terms of trade and a broader wave of market deleveraging. Of the two, the terms-of-trade dynamic is likely to be the more decisive factor. How long the energy shock persists will determine whether EUR/USD needs to slide toward the 1.10–1.12 region or can stabilize closer to 1.15. Our central scenario favors the latter, assuming operational tensions ease in the coming week and the Strait of Hormuz gradually reopens.

    Unless fresh headlines emerge from the Gulf today, market sentiment may begin to steady—equity futures are already pointing to a less negative open—and EUR/USD could establish support in the 1.1550–1.1575 range.

    Sources: Chris Turner

  • Dollar Strengthens While Euro Slips Amid Energy Price Spike

    The dollar hovered near a three-month peak in Asian trading on Wednesday, as traders pulled back from the euro amid escalating Middle East tensions that fueled concerns over persistently higher energy costs and battered global equities.

    The euro edged down 0.2% to $1.1590, marking a third straight day of losses after earlier sliding to its weakest level since late November. The decline followed Tuesday’s data showing euro zone inflation rose more than anticipated in February, even before the outbreak of the Iran conflict.

    According to George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, the Iran war’s effect on EUR/USD ultimately centers on energy. He noted that Europe is facing a negative supply shock that effectively acts as a tax, transferring income to overseas energy producers and increasing demand for dollars.

    Markets extended their downturn on Wednesday as mounting inflation fears spread across stocks and bonds. Intensified strikes by Israeli and U.S. forces on Iranian targets triggered a flight to cash, further weighing on risk assets.

    Oil and gas prices have surged as attacks on Iran disrupt Middle Eastern energy exports. Tehran’s countermeasures targeting shipping lanes and energy infrastructure have halted navigation in the Gulf and led to production suspensions from Qatar to Iraq.

    Benchmark Brent crude climbed 1.9% to $82.94 a barrel—its highest level since July 2024—bringing total gains since Friday to 14%. Meanwhile, European gas prices have soared 70% since the end of last week.

    ING analysts noted in a research report that the ECB’s previously comfortable position is now under pressure, adding that a quick resolution appears unlikely. They warned that the prospect of rate hikes from the European Central Bank could threaten carry trades and lead to a sharp widening in eurozone government bond spreads. Sterling weakened 0.3% to $1.3323.

    The U.S. dollar index, which tracks the greenback against six major peers, rose 0.1% to 99.208 after earlier touching its highest level since November 28. The dollar slipped 0.2% against the yen to 157.52.

    In offshore trading, the U.S. currency gained 0.1% versus the Chinese yuan to 6.9287, following mixed February PMI readings. Official data pointed to a contraction in activity, while a private survey significantly exceeded expectations.

    The Australian dollar dropped 0.6% to $0.6996, despite figures showing stronger fourth-quarter GDP growth. Analysts at Capital Economics suggested the headline data may exaggerate weakness in private demand, noting that although details were mixed, the Reserve Bank of Australia is likely to remain wary that economic growth is still running above its sustainable pace.

    The New Zealand dollar edged up 0.1% to $0.5898. In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin declined 0.4% to $67,776.69, and ether lost 0.5% to $1,958.81.

    Sources: Reuters

  • Oil Jumps as Supply Risks Mount; Goldman Raises Price Outlook

    Oil prices climbed sharply again on Wednesday, building on strong gains from the previous two sessions, as the escalating confrontation among the U.S., Israel, and Iran heightened fears of supply disruptions.

    By 03:40 ET (08:40 GMT), Brent Oil Futures for May delivery had advanced 3.5% to $84.25 per barrel, while WTI Crude Oil Futures rose 3.4% to $77.10 per barrel. Both benchmarks had already rallied nearly 5% on Tuesday, after jumping about 7% at the start of the week, with Brent touching its highest level since July 2024.

    Supply risks dominate sentiment

    The conflict erupted over the weekend when U.S. and Israeli forces carried out coordinated strikes on Iranian military targets, reportedly killing Ali Khamenei. Fighting continued into Wednesday, with U.S. Admiral Brad Cooper stating that more than 2,000 Iranian targets had been struck.

    Tehran has retaliated with missile and drone attacks on neighboring Arab countries hosting U.S. bases and has issued threats to international shipping. Oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz—a chokepoint responsible for roughly 20% of global crude shipments—have been specifically targeted.

    The mounting threat to this key transit route for exporters such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and the UAE has injected a sizable geopolitical risk premium into oil markets. ING analysts noted that disruptions in the Strait are beginning to impact upstream flows. They also cited reports that Iraq has curtailed output at its largest oilfields, including Rumaila and West Qurna 2, taking around 1.2 million barrels per day offline.

    Goldman raises 2026 outlook

    On Wednesday, Goldman Sachs lifted its average price forecast for the second quarter of 2026, raising Brent by $10 to $76 per barrel and WTI by $9 to $71.

    The bank’s projections assume that reduced flows through Hormuz will significantly draw down OECD inventories and Middle East production in March. Goldman emphasized that risks remain skewed to the upside, particularly if export disruptions persist longer than expected or if oil infrastructure sustains damage.

    It added that if volumes through Hormuz remain constrained for another five weeks, Brent could climb to $100 per barrel—a level likely to trigger demand destruction to prevent inventories from dropping too low.

    However, analysts cautioned that the supply-driven rally could eventually undermine demand. Prolonged high prices may stoke inflation and compound broader economic risks, potentially dampening consumption and weighing on crude prices over time.

    U.S. pledges support for shipping

    Investors are also watching remarks from Donald Trump, who said the U.S. Navy would escort commercial vessels if necessary and pledged government backing to ensure safe passage through the Strait.

    ING pointed out that insurers have begun withdrawing war-risk coverage for ships transiting Hormuz. While U.S. assurances may offer some relief, analysts cautioned that restoring confidence in shipping lanes will take time.

    Although military escalation has fueled the rally, signs of coordinated international efforts to safeguard maritime traffic could help limit further near-term gains.

    Sources: Peter Nurse

  • Bitcoin Holds Near $68K as Trump Signals Support; Iran Concerns Linger

    Bitcoin was little changed on Wednesday, drawing modest support after Donald Trump called for stronger regulatory backing of the crypto sector.

    Still, lingering concerns over the escalating U.S.-Iran conflict—and its potential inflationary fallout—kept broader digital asset markets under pressure, capping what had been a brief rebound earlier in the week.

    Bitcoin was flat at $68,147.8 as of 01:30 ET (06:30 GMT). The token had briefly climbed back toward $69,000 earlier this week before surrendering part of those gains.

    Trump targets banks over crypto legislation

    In a Tuesday evening social media post, Trump accused major U.S. banks of attempting to weaken the GENIUS Act—legislation regulating stablecoins—by delaying progress on the CLARITY Act in the Senate. The latter bill aims to establish a broader regulatory framework for crypto markets.

    Trump argued that record bank profits should not come at the expense of the administration’s crypto agenda, warning that failure to pass the CLARITY Act could drive innovation overseas. He urged banks to support, rather than obstruct, efforts to formalize rules for the industry.

    According to reports, Trump met privately with Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, shortly before issuing his remarks. Armstrong has opposed a full ban on yield payments for stablecoins.

    The GENIUS Act, passed in June 2025, prohibits issuers such as Tether from directly paying yields to holders. However, third-party platforms like exchanges may still offer such returns—an arrangement banking groups argue creates a regulatory loophole.

    The CLARITY Act, approved by the House in July but still awaiting Senate passage, has faced delays largely due to disagreements over whether stablecoin yield payments should be regulated similarly to bank interest payments.

    Altcoins muted amid geopolitical strain

    Broader crypto markets traded within a narrow range on Wednesday. While optimism over potential U.S. regulatory clarity provided some support, investor sentiment remained constrained by ongoing tensions in the Middle East.

    With the U.S., Israel, and Iran conflict entering its fifth day, fears of supply disruptions—particularly in global oil markets—have fueled inflation concerns. Persistent price pressures could prompt major central banks to maintain a hawkish stance, dampening appetite for risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.

    Among major tokens, Ethereum fell 1% to $1,979.99, while XRP slipped 0.2% to $1.3594. Solana and BNB were little changed, while Cardano declined 3%. In the meme coin segment, Dogecoin dropped 2.6%, and TRUMP slid 3.4%.

    Sources: Ambar Warrick

  • S&P 500: Higher Rates, Surging Oil, and a Stronger Dollar Threaten Equities

    Stocks ended the session little changed, rising just 4 basis points. As anticipated in this free daily note, the S&P 500 opened with a gap lower and quickly tested the 6,800 put wall. Implied volatility was sharply compressed as those put positions were likely unwound, paving the way for a rebound in equities.

    In short, the action unfolded largely in line with Sunday’s outlook.

    The more notable development was that the CBOE Volatility Index still climbed to 21.5 on the session after spiking to roughly 25 earlier in the day. Examining the volatility smile, implied volatility for the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust March 20 options moved broadly higher. With minimal net price change in the underlying, the bulk of the adjustment reflected a parallel upward shift in implied volatility across the curve. Put skew steepened, while call skew flattened.

    In other words, volatility did increase overall, but the sharp pullback from intraday highs helped power the rebound following the opening gap lower.

    At the same time, the gap between the S&P 500 Dispersion Index and three-month implied correlation tightened. Historically, that spread has tended to act as a leading indicator for the S&P 500. It’s hard to envision a setup where implied volatility stays elevated and correlations continue to climb without the index eventually facing downside pressure.

    For the moment, though, options traders seem comfortable maintaining positioning around the 6,800 level.

    Equities could also face headwinds if interest rates and crude prices keep pushing higher. A combination of rising yields and elevated oil costs is rarely constructive for economic growth. The same dynamic extends to the U.S. dollar — since 2022, oil, rates, and the greenback have often moved in tandem.

    If all three continue advancing, financial conditions would likely tighten over time, a backdrop that historically has not been favorable for stocks.

    But as long as the options market keeps propping up the S&P 500, what could possibly derail the rally?

    Sources: Michael Kramer

  • WTI climbs more than 6%, breaking above $75 as US-Iran war fears intensify.

    • WTI crude surged over 6%, climbing back above the $75 level amid heightened market tension.
    • Oil prices have shot up as fears grow that the escalating US-Iran conflict could disrupt global supply chains.
    • Goldman Sachs suggests the market is currently pricing in roughly an $18 per barrel geopolitical risk premium on crude.

    West Texas Intermediate (WTI) jumped more than 6% on Tuesday, pushing past the key $75 threshold as the intensifying US–Iran conflict stoked concerns over possible supply disruptions via the Strait of Hormuz.

    At the time of writing, the US crude benchmark is hovering near $76.16 — its highest level since June 2025.

    Roughly 20% of global oil shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz, underscoring its status as a critical energy chokepoint. Senior figures from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) reportedly announced the closure of the strait, warning that any vessel attempting to transit could be “set ablaze.”

    Amid escalating security risks, many shipowners have suspended passage through the corridor, with several tankers waiting outside the waterway. In addition, Saudi Aramco has halted operations at its Ras Tanura refinery after a drone strike in the vicinity. The site has a processing capacity of approximately 550,000 barrels per day.

    According to a Reuters report on Monday, Goldman Sachs estimates that oil prices currently include an $18 per barrel real-time geopolitical risk premium, based on a note issued Sunday. The bank added that the premium could ease to about $4 per barrel if only half of the Strait of Hormuz’s flows are disrupted for one month.

  • The Dollar rallies sharply, reclaiming its traditional safe-haven appeal.

    The U.S. dollar extended its gains on Tuesday as escalating tensions in the Middle East reinforced the greenback’s traditional role as a global safe-haven asset.

    At 04:25 ET (09:25 GMT), the Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the currency against six major peers, rose 0.8% to 99.080 — its highest level since January. The index had already advanced nearly 1% on Monday, marking its strongest daily performance in seven months.

    Dollar supported by rising geopolitical tensions

    Safe-haven demand continued to underpin the dollar as the conflict, initially centered between the U.S. and Iran, spread across the broader region.

    Reports indicated missile strikes targeted the U.S. embassy in Riyadh, while Amazon data centers in the UAE and Bahrain were also hit as Iran launched retaliatory attacks throughout the Middle East.

    The U.S. State Department confirmed it has ordered the evacuation of non-essential government personnel and family members from Bahrain, Iraq, and Jordan.

    Meanwhile, Israel announced simultaneous military operations targeting Iran and Lebanon after the Tehran-backed Hezbollah group launched missiles and drones toward Tel Aviv.

    Analysts at ING noted that the dollar strengthened broadly as investors reacted to surging energy prices. They added that in foreign exchange markets, the current environment highlights a divide between energy-independent economies and those heavily reliant on imports. In this context, the U.S. dollar appears well-positioned to benefit from the energy shock.

    ING suggested the Dollar Index could remain supported in the near term, potentially targeting the 99.50–100.00 range as long as energy prices stay elevated.

    The renewed safe-haven demand comes after months of skepticism about the dollar’s resilience during periods of stress, particularly after it failed to rally during last year’s tariff-driven global market downturn.

    Euro pressured by energy exposure

    In Europe, EUR/USD fell 0.5% to 1.1627, extending prior losses as the euro remained under pressure due to the region’s heavy dependence on imported energy.

    ING noted that soaring natural gas prices have intensified downside pressure on the pair. While many expect the spike in gas prices to be temporary, sizable long positioning in the euro may discourage aggressive dip-buying unless clear signs of de-escalation emerge.

    Investors are also awaiting the Eurozone’s flash February inflation data. Headline annual inflation is projected at 1.7%, unchanged from January, while core inflation — excluding food and energy — is expected at 2.2% year-on-year.

    ING added that an upside surprise in inflation could lend modest support to the euro by making the European Central Bank more sensitive to energy-driven price pressures.

    Elsewhere, GBP/USD declined 0.7% to 1.3314 as sterling remained weak. EUR/CHF slipped 0.2% to 0.9124 after the Swiss National Bank indicated a greater willingness to intervene in currency markets following the Swiss franc’s surge to a more-than-decade high against the euro.

    Asian currencies struggle

    In Asia, USD/JPY was little changed at 157.48 after climbing 0.8% overnight. Persistent uncertainty may prompt the Bank of Japan to adopt a more cautious policy stance, lowering expectations for a near-term rate hike.

    Japan’s heavy reliance on imported energy also leaves the economy vulnerable to rising prices. Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama stated that currency market intervention remains an option to stabilize the yen.

    ING noted that Japan’s energy-import dependence weakens the yen’s traditional safe-haven appeal, suggesting official intervention could become the primary support factor for the currency.

    Elsewhere, USD/CNY rose 0.3% to 6.8994, recovering further from last week’s nearly three-year low, while AUD/USD fell 0.4% to 0.7060 as the risk-sensitive Australian dollar retreated.

    Sources: Peter Nurse

  • Oil Prices Surge After Strikes on Iran – Could Energy Markets Continue Climbing?

    Key Takeaways

    Heightened geopolitical tensions triggered a sharp 7–8% rally in WTI and Brent crude at the start of March. A confirmed technical breakout, along with a rising 200-day moving average, indicates the broader uptrend remains intact despite near-term resistance levels. Energy equities continue to outperform the wider market as volatility intensifies across commodities.

    After Venezuela, attention has now shifted to Iran. Weekend strikes led by the U.S. and Israel on the oil-producing nation sent crude prices surging to open March. WTI climbed 7% to $72, while Brent advanced 8% to $79 per barrel.

    Notably, the Brent–WTI spread widened beyond $7 — up from roughly $3 during last year’s more stable geopolitical environment — underscoring growing geopolitical risk.

    Oil’s Rally Isn’t Exactly a Surprise

    Crude’s advance didn’t begin overnight. WTI carved out a bottom in mid-December just below $55, marking a multi-year low as President Trump pushed for lower domestic energy prices. A decisive move above the 50-day moving average in January — followed by a breakout above the 200-day average weeks later — signaled that bulls were taking control. Now, $WTIC is trading at its strongest level since the U.S. struck key Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025.

    The pressing question now is: Where does oil head next?

    Let the Charts Do the Talking

    As always, it helps to swap the macro lens for a technical one. Earlier this year, crude broke out of a downtrend formation — a clear signal to consider gaining exposure, whether through an oil ETF like the United States Oil Fund or by overweighting energy stocks.

    At the time, the mid-$50 range was emerging as a critical support zone. Even amid bearish rhetoric from the White House and persistent talk of a supply glut, WTI continued grinding higher.

    Near-Term Selling Pressure?

    Taking a broader view, crude may now be running into resistance following a powerful 30% surge in less than three months. The rolling front-month contract spiked into the mid-$70s on Sunday night before easing back toward the low $70s — establishing a fresh battleground for traders.

    Adding to the tension, the CBOE Oil Volatility Index has jumped sharply, signaling that a decisive breakout — or breakdown — could unfold quickly. Technically, WTI has also tagged a descending resistance line drawn from the Q3 2023 peak, doing so after one of its strongest single-day advances in the past five years.

    Also note the upward slope of the 200-day moving average — a sign that bulls remain in control of the broader trend. While the current advance lacks the explosive momentum seen five years ago, when Brent surged to $135, there are still constructive elements supporting the bullish case. With the 200-day average gradually climbing and seasonally favorable calendar trends ahead, oil bulls have several tailwinds working in their favor.

    Muted March, Lively April–June?

    StockCharts’ seasonality data shows that while March has delivered mixed results over the past 20 years, the second quarter has produced consistently strong returns. In fact, the April-to-June period stands out as the best-performing three-month stretch of the year.

    On the chart below, a push through the low $70s would suggest the next upside target lies in the $77–$80 area, where prices peaked between Q3 2024 and last June. Beyond that, a move toward $92–$93 is not out of the question.

    For Fibonacci watchers, the 38.2% retracement of the March 2022 high to the December 2025 low comes into focus slightly above $82. Meanwhile, the 61.8% retracement level sits just shy of the $100 mark.

    XOM & XLE Flash Clear Bullish Signals

    Another way to capture both relative strength and absolute momentum in the energy complex is through energy equities. My preferred name there is Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM). Back in December, I highlighted $155 as an achievable target based on developing chart formations. The stock reached that level swiftly, peaking near $157 before retracing to around $145. Ahead of the weekend’s geopolitical flare-up, a daily bull flag appeared to be resolving in favor of the bulls.

    Although not flawless, the “Extended Hours” feature on StockCharts SharpCharts helps assess more detailed after-hours and pre-market price action. That broader view shows how a pattern of lower highs and higher lows paved the way for a breakout within a larger uptrend. On Monday, XOM gapped sharply from $152.50 to $160.

    A fresh measured-move target of $188 is now in play, derived from the January–February advance projected from the $150 consolidation breakout. That said, a price gap remains just above $150, and it could be revisited if West Texas Intermediate stalls near the previously mentioned downtrend resistance.

    More broadly, Energy has emerged as the clear leader among the 11 S&P 500 sectors, outperforming by a wide margin. The group was up 24.4% year-to-date through February.

    The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund surged 25% in the first two months of the year, marking its strongest consecutive two-month performance since October–November 2022, when it rebounded sharply off the bear market lows.

    Like its largest holding, Exxon Mobil, the bulls seem firmly in control of the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund. The monthly chart suggests that once the $50–$51 resistance zone was cleared, momentum accelerated decisively. A long-term objective in the low $90s appears achievable, measured by the magnitude of the 2014–2020 decline, the rebound to $50, and the early-2026 breakout to fresh highs.

    Depending on how March plays out, XLE could be on track for its strongest quarterly gain ever.

    The Bottom Line

    Traders were fixated on futures screens at 6 p.m. ET Sunday, as Brent Crude surged 13% on the open and West Texas Intermediate briefly climbed toward $75. Early profit-taking tempered the initial spike, yet volatility across the energy complex remains elevated. While U.S. crude is running into near-term resistance, longer-term charts continue to show constructive strength in energy stocks.

    Sources: Mike Zaccardi

  • Financial Stocks Come Under Strain

    The heatmap below, via Finviz, highlights one-month returns across the S&P 500 financial sector. Notably, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B) and several insurers have posted gains, while most other financial names have lagged. For comparison, the broader index declined 2.80% over the same stretch. Three key forces appear to be weighing on the group:

    Yield Curve Pressure:

    Banks typically fund themselves through short-term deposits and CDs while extending longer-term loans. As a result, the slope of the yield curve directly affects net interest margins. Recently, the curve has flattened by roughly 25 basis points, compressing margins and dampening earnings prospects.

    Credit Concerns:

    As discussed in Monday’s commentary, stress is building in the private credit market due to rising loan losses and potential fraud. Major institutions such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are significant participants in that space. Turbulence in private credit is now spilling over into banks and brokers more broadly. At the same time, consumer delinquencies are trending higher, adding to sector-wide risk.

    Credit Card Competition:

    Payment leaders Visa (NYSE: V) and Mastercard (NYSE: MA), long viewed as possessing durable competitive advantages, are facing mounting competition from lower-cost payment alternatives. Real-time payment rails, account-to-account transfers, and fintech platforms are increasingly bypassing traditional card networks and their interchange fees. Investors are beginning to question the sustainability of their pricing power.

    Taken together — margin compression, mounting credit risks, and intensifying payment competition — the financial sector currently lacks a compelling catalyst for sustained outperformance.

    Key Things to Monitor Today

    Earnings

    Economy

    No major economic data releases today.

    Financial Stocks Are Losing Momentum

    Building on the opening section, the financial sector has been the weakest performer over the past five days. The first chart highlights that it has lagged the S&P 500 by 3.00% during that span, following an additional 2.84% underperformance in the preceding 20-day period.

    The second chart shows that the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) continues to churn in the lower-left quadrant, indicating that both its absolute technical score and its relative strength versus the S&P 500 remain in oversold territory.

    As noted earlier, three primary factors are pressuring the financial sector, and there is no clear near-term fundamental catalyst to shift the tone.

    Today’s Tweet Spotlight

    Sources: Michael Lebowitz

  • Gold Forecast: XAU/USD Encounters Resistance Near $5,400 at Top of Rising Channel

    Gold prices tumble toward $5,180 despite the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Tehran has stepped up military operations near the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation against the United States, escalating regional tensions. At the same time, stronger-than-expected US factory inflation data has prompted traders to scale back expectations of near-term Federal Reserve rate cuts.

    During Tuesday’s European session, XAU/USD declined roughly 2.5% to trade near $5,180. The pullback follows four consecutive days of gains, including a sharp rally on Monday when investors sought safe-haven assets amid intensifying geopolitical risks.

    Over the weekend, the United States and Israel carried out coordinated airstrikes on Iran, reportedly eliminating several senior leaders, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

    In response, Tehran shut down the Strait of Hormuz and launched attacks on Israeli territory as well as multiple US military installations across the region. Earlier Tuesday, Iranian forces also targeted the US Embassy in Riyadh using drones.

    Although gold typically benefits from heightened geopolitical uncertainty, the metal has come under pressure as expectations for a dovish Federal Reserve have moderated. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, the probability that the Fed will keep interest rates unchanged at its June meeting has risen to 53.5%, up from 42.7% on Friday.

    Traders reassessed their rate-cut expectations following Monday’s release of the US ISM Manufacturing Prices Paid index for February. The inflation gauge, which measures changes in input costs such as labor and raw materials, surged to 70.5—well above forecasts of 59.5 and the prior reading of 59.0—signaling stronger price pressures at the factory level.

    Gold (XAU/USD) 4-Hour Chart Analysis

    XAU/USD is trading below $5,200 at the time of writing. The short-term outlook has shifted to neutral with a bearish bias after the pair retreated from the upper boundary of its Rising Channel formation near $5,400 and moved back toward the 20-period Exponential Moving Average (EMA), currently positioned around $5,280.

    Momentum indicators reinforce the weakening bullish tone. The 14-period Relative Strength Index (RSI) has fallen sharply from overbought territory above 80 to approximately 49, signaling a clear loss of upside momentum and diminishing buying pressure.

    On the downside, immediate support is located near $5,065, aligning with the lower boundary of the Rising Channel. A decisive break beneath this level could expose the psychological $5,000 mark. Conversely, on the upside, the upper boundary of the Rising Channel remains the primary resistance zone, just above $5,400.

    Sources: Sagar Dua

  • Iran-related risks could undermine the widespread gains seen in markets.

    All major asset classes were still showing positive year-to-date returns as of Friday’s close. However, market conditions can shift dramatically over a single weekend.

    The ongoing joint U.S.–Israel military operation against Iran is expected to persist for days, potentially even weeks. While the longer-term market impact remains uncertain, it is reasonable to expect that the prevailing bullish sentiment — already exhibiting signs of exhaustion in certain segments — may become another casualty of escalating tensions in the Middle East.

    Through February 27, foreign equities and commodities had emerged as the top performers in 2026, based on ETF benchmarks. Yet assumptions that seemed firmly grounded just a week ago now appear outdated in light of rapidly evolving geopolitical developments.

    The central issue now is the degree of vulnerability facing the global economy. In short, the longer the conflict persists, the greater the risk of economic blowback. At present, the likelihood of a swift resolution appears limited, particularly as the war expands across the Middle East, including Iran’s strike on Saudi oil infrastructure.

    According to Torbjorn Soltvedt, an analyst at Verisk Maplecroft, the attack on Ras Tanura Refinery represents a meaningful escalation, placing Gulf energy infrastructure directly in Iran’s crosshairs. He noted that a prolonged period of instability is likely, as Iran attempts to inflict economic pressure by targeting tankers, regional energy facilities, trade corridors, and U.S. security partners.

    Should the conflict drag on and oil prices remain elevated, the global economic impact could be substantial. In 2025, approximately 31% of all seaborne crude shipments passed through the Strait of Hormuz, according to analytics firm Kpler. Given Iran’s strategic positioning, it retains the capacity to disrupt — if not completely halt — shipping flows through this critical chokepoint.

    Norbert Rücker, head of economics at Julius Baer, emphasized that the broader economic consequences hinge largely on the uninterrupted flow of oil and gas through Hormuz. The gravest risk, he suggested, is not necessarily a full closure, but significant damage to key regional energy infrastructure.

    Kpler further cautioned that any meaningful shutdown — or even a prolonged de facto closure driven by insurers withdrawing coverage — would likely trigger simultaneous supply shocks across multiple commodity markets.

    How long the conflict will endure remains highly uncertain. On Sunday, Donald Trump indicated that the military campaign could last “four weeks or less,” though such timelines in geopolitical conflicts are often fluid.

    Energy markets are already reacting. Crude prices are climbing, with the international Brent Crude benchmark trading near $78 per barrel this morning — its highest level in more than a year.

    The Trump administration’s stated objective of pursuing regime change in Iran points to the possibility of a protracted conflict. On Sunday, Donald Trump urged “Iranian patriots who yearn for freedom” to seize the moment and reclaim their country — rhetoric that signals ambitions extending beyond limited military strikes.

    However, achieving regime change would be extraordinarily difficult. Although Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, was reportedly killed in Saturday’s airstrikes, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps remains a formidable power center. The Revolutionary Guard — Iran’s dominant military institution with vast economic holdings that help finance its operations — has likely prepared for sustained confrontation following years of tensions and prior strikes by the U.S. and Israel. Airpower alone is unlikely to dismantle what amounts to the regime’s praetorian guard.

    According to Jonathan Panikoff, now affiliated with the Atlantic Council, the decisive factor will ultimately be internal dynamics. Once U.S. and Israeli strikes subside, any movement to end the regime would depend on whether rank-and-file security forces stand aside or align with popular unrest. Otherwise, those elements of the regime that retain control of weapons are likely to use force to preserve power.

    Regime change in Iran is currently viewed as only moderately probable. Betting markets on Polymarket assign roughly a 42% likelihood to that outcome. The takeaway: expectations for a swift resolution appear limited, with the conflict likely to persist until one side concedes strategic ground.

    However, the longer-term outlook may look different. Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House, argues that over time the survival of the Islamic Republic in its current form is doubtful. In his assessment, the regime as it exists today may ultimately prove unsustainable.

    If that scenario unfolds, the central question shifts to succession: what replaces the current leadership — and whether any transition ushers in greater stability or instead fuels further instability within Iran and across the broader Middle East.

    Sources: James Picerno

  • Oil Jumps After Iran Conflict Closes Strait of Hormuz: 5 Energy Stocks to Consider

    The world’s most critical oil chokepoint has effectively gone offline — and energy markets are adjusting instantly.

    Brent crude surged 13% to $82.37 per barrel on Monday morning, marking its largest one-day jump in four years. The rally followed coordinated U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on Iran over the weekend — an operation the Pentagon has labeled Operation Epic Fury. The strikes killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, ending his 36-year rule and plunging the Islamic Republic into its most severe political upheaval since 1979. Tehran responded swiftly, launching attacks on U.S. bases across the region and, more critically for global markets, targeting oil tankers moving through the Strait of Hormuz.

    That narrow passageway handles roughly 20% of global oil flows each day. By Monday morning, it was effectively shut. Maersk suspended all vessel transits. Over 200 oil and LNG carriers dropped anchor. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reportedly warned ships that no vessels would be permitted to pass. This is no longer rhetoric — it is a tangible supply shock.

    Why the Oil Outlook Has Fundamentally Shifted

    Oil markets are accustomed to geopolitical tension. They have repeatedly absorbed headlines without lasting disruption. What they cannot easily digest is the sudden loss of one-fifth of global supply with no clear timeline for restoration.

    Just days ago, Brent was trading near $73, and the prevailing narrative centered on excess supply. The U.S. Energy Information Administration projected WTI crude would average $53 by year-end. OPEC+ was discussing potential production increases. Market bears appeared firmly in control.

    That backdrop has flipped. Brent settled near $79 after briefly touching $82, while WTI climbed from $67 on Friday to $72. Diesel futures — a key barometer of industrial activity — spiked more than 20% intraday. U.S. gasoline futures advanced 9% to their highest level since July 2024. According to GasBuddy analyst Patrick De Haan, retail gasoline prices could rise by 10 to 30 cents per gallon in the near term, with some stations potentially increasing prices by as much as 85 cents.

    The market is no longer pricing geopolitical risk. It is pricing physical disruption.

    “The magnitude of the retaliation caught the market completely off guard,” said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy. “This is far removed from what investors had been pricing in.”

    OPEC+ attempted to ease concerns on Sunday by announcing a relatively small output increase of 206,000 barrels per day for April. However, as Helima Croft of RBC Capital Markets noted, incremental barrels offer limited relief if transport routes remain compromised. “Accessing spare capacity becomes highly constrained when key waterways are effectively shut down,” she wrote.

    From a broader market perspective, Dominic Wilson of Goldman Sachs emphasized that equities will be driven less by dramatic headlines and more by the duration of the energy shock. In a client note, he argued that only a prolonged and severe spike in oil prices would materially alter the global growth trajectory.

    Meanwhile, analysts at JPMorgan outlined four key variables shaping the outlook: the scale of supply disruption, the length of the outage, the speed at which alternative production can be activated, and the credibility of a diplomatic resolution. On Sunday, Donald Trump suggested U.S. military operations could extend for “four to five weeks” — a timeframe that implies a potentially sustained period of elevated risk for energy markets.

    How to Position for the Oil Shock

    Energy equities are the clearest near-term beneficiaries, and capital is already rotating aggressively into the space. The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) notched a fresh 52-week high on Monday. Below are five vehicles to consider:

    Exxon Mobil (XOM)

    Trading near $155, just shy of its all-time high of $156.93, Exxon represents the most diversified large-cap exposure to elevated crude prices. The company produced 4.7 million barrels of oil equivalent per day last quarter, exceeded Q4 expectations with EPS of $1.71, and has earmarked $20 billion in buybacks for 2026.

    Wells Fargo recently lifted its price target to $183 from $156. CEO Darren Woods reiterated on the latest earnings call that there is “no near-term peak Permian” for the company. With Permian breakevens around $35 per barrel and production in Guyana scaling, incremental oil price gains translate efficiently into free cash flow expansion.

    Chevron (CVX)

    Shares briefly reached a new 52-week high of $196.76 before closing near $193. Chevron’s estimated Brent breakeven — inclusive of dividends and capex — sits near $50 per barrel. At current levels around $79 Brent, the company is generating substantial surplus cash.

    Bank of America raised its target to $206 from $188. Chevron is also reportedly in exclusive discussions to assume control of Iraq’s West Qurna 2 field from Lukoil, a move that would add meaningful production upside. CEO Mike Wirth recently characterized the company as “bigger, stronger, and more resilient than ever.”

    ConocoPhillips (COP)

    Up nearly 4% to roughly $118 and marking a new 52-week high, ConocoPhillips offers more direct leverage to crude prices given its pure upstream model.

    Goldman Sachs added COP to its U.S. Conviction Buy List, arguing the stock is approaching a material re-rating. The Marathon Oil integration is enhancing scale, while a $2 billion asset divestiture is sharpening its Permian focus. At current oil prices, COP is generating approximately $7 in EPS, implying a sub-17x multiple — reasonable for a commodity cycle inflection.

    Occidental Petroleum (OXY)

    Trading near $54, Occidental offers higher beta exposure. Its more levered balance sheet amplifies upside in a sustained higher-price environment.

    Berkshire Hathaway holds roughly 28% of the company, providing a credibility anchor via Warren Buffett’s long-term endorsement. While the Carbon Engineering acquisition adds energy-transition optionality, the immediate thesis is straightforward: if Brent sustains levels above $80, OXY’s earnings power expands rapidly, making a $70+ valuation plausible under that scenario.

    Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE)

    For investors seeking diversified sector exposure without single-name volatility, XLE remains the default allocation. Trading near $93 and at a 52-week high, the ETF is heavily weighted toward Exxon (~22%), Chevron (~17%), and ConocoPhillips (~8%), which together account for nearly half the portfolio.

    XLE provides integrated exposure across oil, gas, and energy services in a single vehicle. Should the conflict extend for several weeks — as suggested by Donald Trump — the entire sector could undergo a structural repricing higher.

    The Bear Case You Can’t Ignore

    History shows that geopolitical shocks often produce violent spikes followed by equally sharp reversals. During the June 2025 “12-day war” between Israel and Iran, crude initially surged but retraced quickly once it became clear that physical supply flows were unaffected.

    While this episode involves direct tanker strikes and the functional closure of the Strait of Hormuz, some analysts still see a limited-duration event. Max Layton of Citigroup argues the base case is a leadership shift in Tehran that brings the conflict to an end within one to two weeks.

    A similar view comes from Landon Derentz at the Atlantic Council. He notes that regional energy infrastructure remains intact and that global supply capacity has not been structurally damaged. The oversupply dynamics that capped prices before the conflict have not disappeared. If Hormuz reopens quickly, crude could surrender much of its recent gains.

    The Inflation Risk

    There is also a macro layer that complicates the bullish narrative. Sustained higher oil prices feed directly into transportation, manufacturing, and consumer input costs. That dynamic could constrain the Federal Reserve, forcing policymakers to delay or abandon anticipated rate cuts.

    Monday’s Institute for Supply Management manufacturing data showed input costs rising at their fastest pace since 2022. Treasury yields have begun to move higher in response. If oil remains elevated long enough to reignite inflation pressures, the Fed’s stance could shift from easing to holding — a headwind for equities broadly, even if energy stocks outperform on relative terms.

    A Structural Repricing of Risk

    That said, even a swift diplomatic resolution would not fully reset the clock. Markets were effectively assigning near-zero geopolitical risk premium to oil prior to this weekend. That complacency has been challenged.

    Energy equities were already trading at modest multiples relative to free cash flow. Now they have a tangible catalyst. Even if the conflict de-escalates quickly, the perception of risk — and the embedded premium in crude pricing — is unlikely to vanish overnight.

    What to Watch

    Three catalysts in the next 72 hours. First, Iran’s response — Tehran’s next move over the next 24 to 48 hours will determine whether this is a two-week shock or a multi-month crisis. Any strikes on Saudi or UAE energy infrastructure pushes Brent toward $90 or beyond.

    Second, the Strait of Hormuz reopening timeline. If shipping insurance companies begin covering Hormuz transits again this week, oil pulls back. If the effective closure extends past Friday, the supply disruption becomes real and sustained — and $80+ becomes the new floor.

    Third, the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The IEA said Monday it’s in contact with major producers about potential coordinated reserve releases. Any SPR drawdown announcement would cap oil’s upside temporarily but wouldn’t change the structural supply picture.

    The energy sector just went from afterthought to the most important trade in the market. Whether this conflict lasts two weeks or two months, the companies producing oil at $35 to $50 breakevens and generating massive free cash flow at $70 to $80 Brent are going to reward shareholders. The question isn’t whether to own energy — it’s how much.

    Sources: Jaachi Mbachu

  • Analyzing the Effects of Iran Tensions: Keep an Eye on Energy Markets

    Over the weekend, the United States and Israel launched coordinated missile and drone strikes on Iran, targeting key military facilities in an attempt to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. The operation reportedly killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, marking a dramatic escalation and sharply increasing regional tensions. Iran responded swiftly with a wide-ranging missile campaign aimed not only at Israel but also at several Gulf states, including Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain. The fallout rippled across the region, prompting multiple Gulf nations to close their airspace and suspend equity trading.

    Energy markets were also disrupted. Shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz—a strategic chokepoint responsible for roughly 20% of global oil flows—slowed dramatically as tanker operators rerouted vessels for security reasons. Meanwhile, Qatar temporarily halted liquefied natural gas production at the world’s largest export terminal following a drone strike. U.S. President Donald Trump indicated that American military operations would persist, suggesting tensions could remain elevated in the near term.

    From a market standpoint, energy represents the primary transmission channel of this crisis into global financial assets. Prolonged or severe disruptions to oil and gas supply could push up inflation expectations, dampen business sentiment, and heighten cross-asset volatility. Simply put, the longer and more intense the geopolitical shock, the greater the potential market fallout.

    This dynamic was visible when markets reopened Monday. Brent crude briefly climbed to $82 per barrel amid concerns over tighter supply. Sustained price strength would likely reinforce inflation pressures, with knock-on effects for equities and interest rates. However, for oil to remain structurally elevated, investors would likely need confirmation of a more extended—or even complete—closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Such a development would mark a significant escalation beyond current disruptions and warrant a larger risk premium in energy markets. Political factors within Iran, particularly how the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) chooses to respond, will be critical. Whether the IRGC de-escalates or intensifies its actions will determine how much of the current market reaction reflects temporary risk pricing versus a genuine physical supply shock.

    Oil Rallies After Tanker Flows Stall in the Strait of Hormuz

    With developments unfolding quickly, tracking energy prices remains one of the clearest ways to gauge both the intensity and staying power of the geopolitical risk. Oil and natural gas markets typically react swiftly to new headlines, making them a real-time indicator of whether tensions are easing, stabilizing, or escalating further. As a result, close monitoring of these markets will be crucial in assessing how the conflict may shape global financial conditions in the coming days and weeks.

    Sources: Kristian Kerr

  • Bitcoin climbs past $69,000, defying broader risk-off selling after tensions escalate between the U.S. and Iran.

    Bitcoin rebounded on Monday, recovering from losses triggered by U.S. strikes on Iran over the weekend. The cryptocurrency’s advance mirrored a broader recovery in equity markets.

    The world’s largest digital asset was up 5.7% at $69,428.4 as of 16:40 ET (21:40 GMT).

    Bitcoin rebounds after weekend selloff

    Bitcoin had dropped sharply after coordinated U.S. and Israeli military operations in Iran reportedly resulted in the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, marking one of the most severe regional escalations in recent years.

    Iran responded with several waves of missile attacks targeting Israeli and U.S. military facilities.

    Following the initial strikes, Bitcoin tumbled to around $63,000 before stabilizing and beginning to recover.

    According to Dessislava Ianeva, analyst at Nexo Dispatch, Bitcoin held relatively steady as markets evaluated the evolving U.S.–Iran situation. While prediction markets remain split on the likelihood of further escalation, the limited price reaction indicates investors currently see the conflict as a contained, short-term risk rather than the beginning of a sustained downturn.

    President Donald Trump stated Monday that the military operation had four key goals: dismantling Iran’s missile capabilities, destroying its navy, preventing the country from acquiring nuclear weapons, and stopping Tehran from supporting and directing terrorist activities.

    “We’re already well ahead of schedule, but whatever time is required, that’s fine. We’ll do whatever it takes,” Trump said, adding that although initial projections suggested four to five weeks, the U.S. has the capacity to extend operations significantly if necessary.

    Strategy adds $204 million in Bitcoin

    Michael Saylor’s company Strategy expanded its Bitcoin holdings last week, purchasing 3,015 BTC valued at approximately $204.1 million, at an average price of about $67,700 per coin.

    Following the acquisition, Strategy’s total Bitcoin holdings increased to 720,737 BTC, accumulated at a total cost of roughly $54.77 billion — averaging about $75,985 per Bitcoin.

    Strategy remains the largest publicly traded corporate holder of Bitcoin, having steadily built one of the most substantial corporate crypto treasuries.

    Altcoins track Bitcoin higher

    Most major altcoins also moved higher alongside Bitcoin.

    Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, climbed 6% to $2,045.01. XRP gained 2.9% to $1.3936, while Solana and Cardano rose 5.7% and 2.2%, respectively.

    Among meme coins, Dogecoin advanced 2.5%.

    Sources: Anuron Mitra

  • Safe-haven demand lifts gold amid widening conflict, but dollar strength curbs upside

    Gold prices climbed in Asian trade on Tuesday, marking a fourth consecutive session of gains as investors assessed the escalating conflict in the Middle East. However, strength in the U.S. dollar limited the metal’s upside momentum.

    Spot gold advanced 1.1% to $5,378.55 per ounce as of 20:26 ET (01:26 GMT), while U.S. gold futures rose 1.5% to $5,390.06. The precious metal had already gained 1% in the prior session.

    Widely regarded as a safe-haven asset during periods of geopolitical uncertainty, bullion attracted fresh demand following an intense weekend of military activity in West Asia.

    Large-scale strikes by U.S. and Israeli forces targeted Iran, reportedly resulting in the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei along with several senior military officials. Tehran responded with missile attacks across the region.

    Tensions expanded beyond Iran, as Israeli forces carried out strikes in Lebanon after Hezbollah attacks, and reports emerged that Kuwaiti air defenses mistakenly shot down U.S. aircraft.

    U.S. President Donald Trump indicated that military operations could persist for several weeks and acknowledged uncertainty within Iran’s leadership following Khamenei’s death, highlighting the risk of extended regional instability.

    Tehran also threatened to target vessels transiting the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz—a key artery for global oil shipments—intensifying concerns over potential supply disruptions and reinforcing demand for defensive assets such as gold.

    Crude prices surged on fears of supply constraints, fueling inflation expectations and underpinning gold’s appeal as a hedge. Nonetheless, gains in bullion were restrained by a firmer U.S. currency.

    The U.S. Dollar Index edged up 0.2% during Asian hours after surging 0.8% in the previous session to its highest level since late January. A stronger dollar typically pressures gold by increasing its cost for holders of other currencies.

    Elsewhere in the precious metals complex, silver rose 1.6% to $90.75 per ounce, while platinum gained 0.5% to $2,321.06 per ounce.

    Sources: Ayushman Ojha

  • U.S. stock futures slide as Iran-related concerns trigger a volatile session on Wall Street

    U.S. equity index futures declined Monday evening, pulling back as renewed tensions among the United States, Israel, and Iran fueled fresh volatility across Wall Street.

    Earlier in the day, U.S. markets staged a sharp recovery from significant intraday losses to close slightly higher. The rebound was supported by solid business activity data, while technology stocks attracted bargain hunters following steep declines in February.

    Investor attention remained firmly fixed on escalating Middle East tensions, as leaders from Washington, Tel Aviv, and Tehran showed no indication of de-escalating the conflict. Weekend strikes by the U.S. and Israel on Iran prompted swift retaliation from Tehran, intensifying geopolitical risks.

    By 20:00 ET (01:00 GMT), S&P 500 futures were down 0.3% at 6,867.0. Nasdaq 100 futures slipped nearly 0.4% to 24,922.25, while Dow Jones futures declined 0.3% to 48,807.0.

    Wall Street swings sharply amid US-Iran tensions

    Major U.S. indices ultimately finished modestly higher on Monday after rebounding from earlier session lows, though market sentiment remained fragile as the regional conflict deepened.

    Technology stocks led the gains, particularly semiconductor names, which recovered after notable February losses. Nvidia surged 2.9% following a 7.3% decline the previous month.

    The S&P 500 closed essentially unchanged, the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged down 0.2%, and the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.4%. Market volatility remained elevated, with the CBOE Volatility Index jumping nearly 8%.

    Hostilities continued into Monday, with the U.S. signaling no intention to halt its military actions. Iran responded with drone and missile strikes targeting Israel and nearby regions, while senior Iranian officials reiterated that negotiations with Washington were not under consideration.

    Markets grew increasingly concerned about the inflationary implications of the conflict, particularly as oil prices surged. A prolonged rise in crude could reignite global inflationary pressures and prompt central banks to adopt a more hawkish stance.

    ANZ analysts noted that higher oil prices represent a negative supply shock, increasing inflation while weighing on growth prospects. They emphasized that the broader economic impact will largely depend on the duration of the conflict.

    U.S. PMI data exceeds expectations

    Meanwhile, February U.S. purchasing managers’ index data came in stronger than expected, according to ISM figures released Monday.

    Manufacturing activity expanded for a second consecutive month, with new orders significantly outperforming forecasts. However, the report also showed a sharp increase in manufacturing input prices, even before factoring in potential energy-related shocks stemming from Middle East tensions.

    The data followed last week’s stronger-than-expected producer price figures for January, reinforcing concerns that inflation may remain sticky. As a result, investors are increasingly wary that the Federal Reserve could maintain interest rates at elevated levels for longer than previously anticipated.

    Several Federal Reserve officials are scheduled to speak in the coming days, which may provide further guidance on the future path of monetary policy.

    Sources: Ambar Warrick

  • Will a War with Iran Move Major Indexes Like the Nasdaq, S&P 500, and Russell 2000?

    Beyond the surge in oil prices — which had already been climbing before Israel and the accompanying U.S. strike on Iran — the longer-term market consequences remain uncertain. I closely monitor how major indices trade relative to their 200-day moving averages. Since late 2025, this positioning has normalized, no longer appearing overbought or presenting the level of risk I had anticipated heading into 2026.

    That said, clearly defined support levels are now in play and are likely to be tested early next week. A break below these levels would not necessarily be severe, as the 200-day moving averages lie beneath and could provide a cushion. The real risk scenario would emerge if the Iran conflict escalates into sustained terrorist attacks targeting U.S. interests, potentially provoking direct U.S. (and possibly Israeli) ground involvement in Iran.

    The Middle East rarely offers quick, decisive resolutions, and the U.S. has little historical success in such engagements to rely upon. In that kind of drawn-out conflict, markets could experience gradual, persistent losses that eventually shift the broader trend into bearish territory. If declines were to push indices decisively below their 200-day moving averages, it could create attractive long-term buying opportunities — even if headlines remain overwhelmingly negative.

    The S&P 500 ended Friday with a technical “sell” signal following higher-volume distribution. February has already seen several distribution days. Considering the questionable activity in prediction markets ahead of the Iran strikes, it raises the possibility that some February selling may have reflected insider positioning around a potential conflict. The elevated distribution volume on Friday — just before Saturday’s airstrikes — stands out as unusual, especially within what had been a range-bound market where volume is typically subdued.

    Ultimately, speculation aside, we can only act on the data in front of us. For now, the S&P 500 remains a “hold.”

    The Nasdaq Composite also registered a distribution day, though the signal was less pronounced than what we saw in the S&P 500. It’s possible the 200-day moving average could converge with established range support just as the index pulls back to retest that same level.

    Technical indicators are giving mixed signals. The only outright positive is a weak MACD buy trigger, but that comes after an extended stretch of relative underperformance compared to the Russell 2000 (IWM). Under these conditions, a break below support would not be surprising — though it’s best to wait and see how price action unfolds.

    The Russell 2000 (IWM) may prove to be the most resilient in the face of negative headlines. Unlike the larger indices, it did not register a distribution day and continues to hold support at its 50-day moving average.

    Technical indicators are leaning constructive: on-balance volume and stochastics are positive, ADX remains neutral, and although MACD is trending lower, it is still positioned above the bullish zero line. For now, the key question is how the index responds to the weekend developments — price action will ultimately provide the clearest signal.

    Bitcoin has responded relatively calmly to the developments surrounding Iran. From a trading perspective, there appears to be a swing setup forming, with a decisive move above $70K or below $65K likely to determine the next directional bias.

    Given that the market is already in oversold territory, even a downside break may struggle to sustain prolonged weakness. Any dip could prove short-lived if buyers step in at lower levels.

    An eventful week is shaping up, but this feels more like the beginning of a broader development rather than its conclusion.

    Sources: Declan Fallon

  • Bonds, Silver, and Yields Just Sent a Major Signal

    In recent weeks, the market has subtly reinforced several of the themes highlighted here:

    • Declining bond yields
    • Renewed momentum in silver and other hard assets
    • Relative strength in sectors like real estate and biotechnology

    These were not random or disconnected developments. They were signals — and taken together, they point to an emerging macro shift.

    Markets typically turn before the broader consensus catches on. At the moment, capital flows indicate that investors may already be adjusting their portfolios in anticipation of a new phase in the economic cycle.

    Rotation Toward Safety and Scarcity

    We’re seeing growing demand in two areas that rarely strengthen at the same time without signaling something deeper:

    • Bonds — pointing to expectations of slower growth, policy easing, or defensive positioning.
    • Hard assets — reflecting concern about persistent inflation, currency debasement, or long-term purchasing power.

    That pairing is significant.

    When investors buy both duration and tangible assets simultaneously, the underlying message isn’t optimism — it’s uncertainty. Specifically, uncertainty about economic stability and the durability of money itself.

    What Equities May Be Signaling

    Stock indices remain elevated, but leadership has narrowed and cross-sector confirmation is uneven.

    Rather than pricing in robust, synchronized growth, equities appear to be grappling with shifting valuation frameworks:

    • Growth expectations lack clarity.
    • Policy direction remains fluid.
    • Liquidity assumptions are creeping higher again.

    In short, equities don’t look decisively bullish — they look transitional, searching for a new equilibrium.

    The Federal Reserve’s Potential Role

    If economic momentum softens further, the Federal Reserve could come under pressure to cushion financial conditions through renewed balance sheet support or liquidity measures.

    Historically, that backdrop creates a familiar tension:

    • Bonds rally on safety and easing expectations.
    • Hard assets climb on fears of currency dilution.
    • Equities struggle with valuation uncertainty.

    Such an environment often tilts performance toward real assets over purely financial assets — at least for a period — as markets recalibrate to shifting macro conditions.

    Inflation May Not Be Over

    One risk that remains underappreciated is inflation not just in consumer goods, but in real-world assets (RWAs), including:

    • Commodities
    • Precious and industrial metals
    • Infrastructure
    • Scarce, tangible assets

    If monetary easing begins before inflation is fully contained, asset-price inflation could reaccelerate — potentially persisting until an economic slowdown or contraction ultimately forces a reset.

    At times, recession becomes the mechanism that restores equilibrium.

    Bottom Line

    Revisiting prior Daily themes isn’t about declaring victory — it’s about framing the present environment.

    Markets may be shifting from liquidity-fueled optimism toward a more defensive, capital-preservation mindset.

    Declining yields, strengthening silver, and resilience in defensive sectors could represent early signals that the investment landscape is transitioning into a more cautious regime.

    The key question now isn’t whether markets were correct before.

    It’s whether they are early — once again.

    ETF Summary

    • S&P 500 (SPY) – Price action is beginning to resemble a potential top, now slipping back below the 50-day moving average.
    • Russell 2000 (IWM) – Sitting right at the 50-DMA and still showing relative leadership versus large caps.
    • Dow Jones (DIA) – Has moved back into an unconfirmed caution phase.
    • Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) – Caution phase confirmed; key level to watch is 590 — it must hold to stabilize momentum.
    • Regional Banks (KRE) – Printed a notably negative candle, reminiscent of stress patterns seen in March 2023.
    • Semiconductors (SMH) – Remains a position of strength; critical to monitor whether this leadership group can maintain its resilience.
    • Transportation (IYT) – Consolidating in a constructive manner and continuing to hold support.
    • Biotechnology (IBB) – Healthy consolidation; if 171 holds, the setup suggests potential for further upside.
    • Retail (XRT) – Still below the 50-DMA. As a key economic “canary,” it must reclaim and hold 85 to improve the outlook.
    • Bitcoin (BTCUSD) – The correction remains technically constructive as long as price stays above 64,000.

    Sources: Michele Schneider

  • Time Is Running Out in the Middle East

    The United States has built up its most significant military footprint in the Middle East since 2003, deploying two aircraft carriers and F-22 stealth fighters. Indirect negotiations in Geneva between US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Iranian officials concluded Thursday without progress. The Trump administration has cautioned that Iran will face “drastic consequences” if it fails to agree to meaningful nuclear concessions.

    Israel has activated bomb shelters and warned Lebanon that its infrastructure could be targeted if Hezbollah becomes involved in any US–Iran confrontation. The US State Department authorized the departure of non-essential personnel and family members from the US Embassy in Israel on February 27, following similar instructions for the embassy in Beirut issued on February 23. Meanwhile, reports suggest the US 5th Fleet in Bahrain has been scaled back to fewer than 100 essential personnel.

    China has urged its citizens to leave Iran immediately. South Korea escalated its advisory to a “Level 3” red alert, instructing nationals to depart. Australia has offered voluntary departure to diplomatic dependents in the UAE, Qatar, and Jordan, citing a worsening security environment. Several European countries, including Finland, Sweden, and Serbia, have also recommended that their citizens evacuate Iran.

    Commercial carriers such as KLM have begun suspending regional flights. Governments are encouraging citizens to exit while commercial routes remain available, warning that air corridors could close quickly if hostilities erupt.

    Does this mean a US–Israel strike on Iran is imminent? Possibly—but diplomatic channels remain active. The State Department confirmed that Secretary of State Marco Rubio will travel to Israel early next week. Meanwhile, reports indicate that Omani Foreign Minister Badr Al Busaidi is set to meet Vice President JD Vance and other US officials in Washington in previously undisclosed talks aimed at preventing escalation.

    Oil markets are ending February on firm footing, with prices rising about $1 per barrel during the final trading week as tensions intensify. This week’s indirect talks in Geneva produced no tangible outcome, and Trump’s 10–15 day deadline is fast approaching. At the same time, attention to the upcoming OPEC+ summit has been muted—potentially opening the door for Saudi Arabia to surprise markets with another production increase for April.

    The recovery in oil prices, combined with a reshuffling of global equity allocations, has recently delivered a notable lift to US energy ETFs (see chart). However, today’s modest $1.50 rise in crude suggests markets may have already priced in the risk of a swift conflict—or remain unconvinced that one is imminent.

    Saudi Arabia could still opt to raise output, but much of that additional supply would need to transit the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint that Iran has repeatedly threatened to shut down.

    Between 2023 and 2025, the 10-year US Treasury yield moved largely in tandem with the price of Brent crude (see chart), reflecting a strong correlation between energy prices and long-term interest rates.

    In recent weeks, however, that relationship has diverged. While oil prices have climbed, the 10-year yield has declined. This shift suggests that investors may be rotating into bonds as a safe haven, anticipating that a renewed conflict in the Middle East could trigger broader geopolitical instability and economic uncertainty.

    It was notable that the 10-year yield slipped below 4.00% today, even after a stronger-than-expected PPI inflation print.

    More broadly, both nominal and real 10-year yields have traded within a relatively narrow range since 2023 (see chart). In our view, that sideways pattern is likely to persist through the remainder of the year.

    Sources: Ed Yardeni

  • Key Instruments in Focus – USD/CAD, EUR/USD, USD/MXN, BTC/USD, USD/JPY, DAX, NASDAQ 100, USD/CHF

    USD/CAD

    The U.S. dollar initially strengthened against the Canadian dollar over the course of the week, but has since pulled back and is now showing signs of indecision. This isn’t particularly surprising, given that the pair has been fluctuating within the same range for the past five weeks. Notably, the 1.3550 level continues to serve as solid support, while the 1.3750 area above remains a key resistance zone.

    For longer-term traders, the prudent approach is likely to wait for a decisive breakout in either direction. In the meantime, short-term participants may keep trading the range, especially as the interest rate differential between the two currencies continues to narrow, encouraging back-and-forth price action.

    EUR/USD

    The euro has traded in a choppy, sideways manner throughout the week, much like the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar. The interest rate differential between the euro and the dollar is relatively modest, with the European Central Bank expected to hold rates steady while the Federal Reserve may move toward cutting them.

    In this kind of environment, traders are searching for a catalyst to drive price in either direction. At the moment, the 1.18 level appears to be acting as a magnet, drawing price back toward it as the market struggles to establish a clear trend.

    USD/MXN

    The U.S. dollar moved higher against the Mexican peso over the week, which isn’t particularly surprising given how sharply it had declined beforehand. If the pair continues to rebound, the 17.50 level is likely to attract selling pressure, making it a potential area to consider short positions.

    A sustained break above 18.00 would be needed before entertaining the idea of a broader trend reversal. For now, the interest rate differential continues to favor the downside, so the pair is often used to collect positive swap. I rarely look to buy this market, though sharp upside moves can occur and prove highly profitable—typically driven by strong momentum or bouts of risk aversion, which tend to override the yield advantage.

    BTC/USD

    Bitcoin has been highly volatile throughout the week, with price action continuing to revolve around the $60,000 level. This area is drawing significant attention, as a decisive break below it could pave the way for a swift move toward the $50,000 region.

    A break above the $72,000 level would open the door for a potential rally toward $84,000. However, at this stage, the more likely scenario appears to be continued sideways consolidation. In fact, the longer Bitcoin trades within a range and builds a base, the healthier the overall structure becomes, potentially setting the stage for a more sustainable move higher later on.

    USD/JPY

    The U.S. dollar edged higher against the Japanese yen over the week, though the ¥158 level continues to act as resistance. At this point, traders seem to be searching for a catalyst strong enough to push the pair beyond the key ¥160 threshold.

    A sustained move above ¥160 could trigger a significant rally, as that area marks the major swing high dating back to 1990. In the meantime, short-term pullbacks are likely to be viewed as buying opportunities, supported by the wide interest rate differential and Japan’s heavy debt burden, which limits the scope for materially higher domestic rates.

    DAX

    The German equity market has been somewhat erratic, with the DAX moving back and forth, though overall activity has been relatively subdued. The 25,000-euro level remains a key focus, as it represents a major round number with strong psychological significance. In the near term, minor pullbacks are likely to be viewed as buying opportunities.

    There is also the potential for a push above the 25,400 level. A decisive breakout there could pave the way for a move toward the 27,000-euro region. At this stage, I have no interest in shorting the DAX, as the German economy appears to be supported by substantial government stimulus measures.

    NASDAQ 100

    The Nasdaq 100 has experienced significant volatility throughout the week. Despite ongoing challenges and heavy selling pressure in major stocks such as Nvidia, the index is set to close the week in relatively steady shape. The 25,000 level remains a key focus, as it represents a major psychological milestone.

    A decisive move above 25,000 could open the door to the 25,500 area, which may act as the next resistance barrier. Overall, the broader outlook remains constructive, with short-term pullbacks likely presenting buying opportunities.

    Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar has continued to weaken against the Swiss franc over the past week, making this currency pair one to monitor closely.

    USD/CHF

    The U.S. dollar has edged lower against the Swiss franc over the past week, making the pair particularly important to monitor. Swiss officials have expressed concern about the franc’s strength, which adds another layer of sensitivity to current price movements.

    The 0.76 level appears to be providing near-term support, and the market will be watching closely to see whether it holds. A breakdown below that area could open the way toward the 0.75 level. Over the longer term, there is a strong possibility that the Swiss National Bank may step in to curb further franc appreciation, though any intervention would more likely begin in the euro–Swiss franc pair rather than in USD/CHF itself.

    Sources: Lewis

  • Strong Growth Forecasts Overlook a Lingering Confidence Red Flag

    Recent U.S. growth data have pointed to notable economic resilience — but consumer sentiment tells a more cautious story.

    According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, real Gross Domestic Product is projected to have expanded at an annualized pace of 4.2% in the fourth quarter of 2025. That figure exceeded expectations and represents one of the strongest quarterly performances in the past two years.

    The expansion was supported by steady consumer spending, firmer exports, and higher government expenditures. Household consumption climbed 3.5%, its fastest rate of increase this year. On the surface, these numbers portray a macroeconomy that remains firmly in growth mode.

    Gross Domestic Product (GDP) represents the total value of goods and services produced within the United States. Of that total, personal consumption expenditures (PCE) account for roughly 68%. Put simply, the consumer is the backbone of the U.S. economy — as household spending goes, so too goes overall economic growth.

    When GDP rises, it reflects an increase in overall economic activity — stronger consumer demand that supports higher production and broader expansion. For that reason, growth rates are closely watched by policymakers, investors, and corporate leaders. Strong GDP figures are often interpreted as a signal of improving sales prospects and profit potential.

    However, GDP does not tell the whole story of household financial well-being.

    By design, economic growth data measure aggregate output. They do not reveal how income is distributed, how conditions vary across regions, or how millions of families actually experience the economy. A clear illustration is the breakdown of consumer spending by income level. At present, roughly half of all U.S. consumer spending is driven by the top 10% of earners — a share that has been increasing — while the spending contribution from the bottom 90% has been declining.

    In other words, headline growth can appear solid even as the underlying breadth of participation narrows.

    In short, strong headline growth can conceal areas of financial strain among households and small businesses. Expansion driven primarily by exports or government spending may not meaningfully filter through to broad segments of workers, creating a disconnect between aggregate output and lived experience.

    A clear example of this distortion appeared in 2025. In the first quarter, a surge in imports aimed at front-running tariffs weighed heavily on GDP. When those trade fears subsided in the second quarter, import flows normalized, producing a sharp rebound in growth. Yet these swings in trade data had limited direct impact on most consumers. The volatility was largely statistical rather than reflective of a dramatic shift in household conditions.

    While GDP figures suggest a sturdy economic backdrop, other coincident and leading indicators tell a more cautious story. The The Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI), which historically leads the U.S. economy by roughly six months, has remained in contraction for an extended period. Its six-month rate of change has long been regarded as one of the more reliable signals of impending slowdowns or recessions.

    Notably, however, despite the prolonged weakness in the LEI, the broader economy has not formally entered recession — underscoring the growing divergence between traditional warning signals and realized economic outcomes.

    At first glance, headline growth data suggest the economy remains on firm footing. Output is expanding, spending is holding up, and aggregate indicators point to continued resilience.

    But a closer examination reveals a more nuanced picture. Beneath the surface, several crosscurrents — from uneven income distribution and trade-related distortions to persistent weakness in leading indicators — point to a mixed underlying environment.

    That divergence helps explain why economic sentiment can feel far weaker than the headline numbers imply. Strong aggregate growth does not automatically translate into broad-based confidence, particularly if gains are concentrated or forward-looking indicators continue to flash caution.

    The Gap Between Rising Stocks and Weak Consumer Sentiment

    Historically, it makes sense that stock markets and economic data would trend in the same direction over the long run. Corporate earnings ultimately derive from economic activity, and sustained growth in output and income should support higher equity valuations over time.

    As discussed in “Return Expectations Are Too High,” long-term market returns are anchored to the growth of the underlying economy, productivity gains, and profit expansion — not simply short-term momentum or sentiment-driven rallies.

    “The chart illustrates average annual inflation-adjusted total returns (including dividends) dating back to 1948, using total-return data compiled by Aswath Damodaran at the NYU Stern School of Business. From 1948 through 2024, the stock market delivered an average real return of 9.26%.

    However, in the years following the 2008 financial crisis, inflation-adjusted total returns increased by nearly three percentage points across the last three measured periods.

    Here’s the challenge: real (inflation-adjusted) equity returns are relatively straightforward to conceptualize. Over time, they reflect economic growth (GDP) plus dividend income, minus inflation. That relationship broadly held from 1948 to 2000.

    Since 2008, though, the math has diverged. Nominal GDP growth has averaged roughly 5%, and dividend yields have hovered near 2%. Yet actual market returns have significantly exceeded what that underlying economic engine would normally justify in terms of sustainable earnings expansion.”

    That 15-year divergence is not particularly surprising. As discussed in “Pavlov Rings the Bell,” markets have repeatedly been cushioned from deeper corrections by aggressive fiscal and monetary intervention.

    Over the past decade and a half, major drawdowns were often met with policy stimulus — whether through deficit spending or actions by the Federal Reserve. Each episode of support was followed by market recovery, reinforcing a powerful feedback loop: intervention became associated with rising asset prices.

    In effect, investors were conditioned to expect rescue during periods of stress — to buy every dip under the assumption that policymakers would step in. That conditioning ties directly to the concept of “moral hazard.”

    Moral hazard (noun, economics): A reduced incentive to guard against risk when one is shielded from its consequences — as with insurance protection.

    Following the Global Financial Crisis, near-zero interest rates and repeated rounds of quantitative easing strengthened the belief that a policy backstop would reappear whenever volatility increased. Over time, that expectation hardened into a reflexive behavior: assume support, assume recovery, assume higher prices.

    Those sustained supports — in both the real economy and financial markets — helped drive a wedge between underlying economic fundamentals and realized financial returns. In other words, policy intervention became a key force behind the growing disconnect between economic reality and asset-price performance.

    At present, GDP growth has continued to surprise to the upside, and several macro indicators reflect ongoing resilience. At the same time, major equity benchmarks such as the S&P 500 have climbed to record levels. That advance has been fueled less by current consumer sentiment and more by expectations of future earnings growth.

    The challenge, however, is that equity valuations appear increasingly disconnected from underlying revenue growth. Markets are pricing in optimism about future expansion, even as broad-based income and demand trends remain uneven.

    There is also a structural limitation embedded in the “wealth effect.” Rising stock prices can support consumption by boosting household net worth. Yet equity ownership in the United States is highly concentrated. Roughly 87% of equities are owned by the top 10% of households. As a result, the transmission from higher stock prices to broader economic activity is narrower than headline gains might suggest.

    That concentration is reflected in spending patterns as well. The top 40% of income earners now account for approximately 80% of total consumption. Consequently, while financial asset values have surged, the macroeconomic lift from those gains is disproportionately tied to higher-income households — leaving sentiment among the broader population more subdued than market performance alone would imply.

    That divergence goes a long way toward explaining the disconnect between subdued consumer sentiment and robust headline economic data.

    When growth and market gains are concentrated among higher-income households — and asset-price appreciation primarily benefits those with significant equity exposure — aggregate statistics can remain strong even as large segments of the population feel financial strain.

    In other words, the macro numbers reflect the strength of those driving the bulk of spending and asset ownership, while sentiment surveys capture the broader lived experience. The result is an economy that looks resilient on paper but feels far less secure to many households.

    Consumer Confidence Surveys Remain Soft Even as Economic Data Stays Strong

    In clear contrast to upbeat macroeconomic indicators and strong equity market gains, consumer sentiment readings have deteriorated significantly. Both the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index and the University of Michigan Surveys have fallen steeply over the past two years, even as stock prices have climbed. Historically, consumer sentiment tends to move in tandem with rising markets, which is intuitive. The chart below presents a composite measure combining these two leading sentiment indicators.

    In both surveys, readings on current conditions and future outlook remain notably subdued, with the expectations component dropping to levels that have historically been linked to recession warnings.

    The downturn in sentiment points to rising concerns over employment prospects, business conditions, and future income. Respondents frequently highlighted worries about inflation, elevated prices, food and energy expenses, the affordability of health insurance, and broader geopolitical and political uncertainty. Yet despite this widespread unease, GDP has continued to grow.

    Importantly, the gap between soft sentiment data and hard economic figures is not unprecedented. Analysts have often observed that consumer attitudes tend to lag underlying economic performance, and sentiment could improve if expansion persists. In the near term, surveys typically capture prevailing fears and uncertainty, which can weigh on confidence even when actual spending remains relatively solid. Although nominal figures indicate that consumer spending is holding up, much of that resilience reflects paying higher prices for the same—or even fewer—goods, rather than an increase in real consumption, which helps explain the sustained weakness in sentiment readings.

    Importantly, if consumer sentiment influences spending—and consumption accounts for roughly 68% of the economy—then that spending ultimately represents demand for businesses of all sizes. In a genuinely strong growth environment, we would expect improving demand to be mirrored by rising confidence across households. Yet, as the composite index illustrates, sentiment levels remain subdued. The historical relationship between confidence measures and the future trajectory of economic activity underscores why this divergence warrants attention.

    Soft sentiment readings do not necessarily signal an imminent downturn. However, they do reflect a guarded mindset among both consumers and business owners. That caution can translate into more restrained spending across key components of GDP. If confidence remains depressed, a moderation in economic activity would be a reasonable outcome.

    Why the Divergence Matters and What It May Signal Ahead

    The gap between solid economic data, rising equity markets, and subdued consumer confidence carries meaningful implications. On the surface, macro indicators point to continued expansion, reinforcing higher stock prices and optimistic earnings forecasts. Yet beneath that strength, households and many business owners report lingering insecurity and pessimism about the future.

    This disconnect prompts several key questions:

    • Can growth remain durable if confidence stays depressed?
    • Will corporate earnings hold up if consumers begin to retrench?
    • Could persistent pessimism eventually shape real-world behavior, leading to slower spending and softer growth?

    History offers cautionary precedents where negative sentiment foreshadowed downturns—not because the hard data was inaccurate, but because sentiment ultimately influenced economic decisions.

    The divergence also highlights distributional dynamics. Aggregate growth figures often mask disparities in income and wealth. Higher-income households account for roughly half of total consumption, while lower-income groups may not fully share in the benefits of expansion. That imbalance helps explain weaker sentiment readings. It also leaves markets vulnerable to any shock that prompts affluent consumers to scale back spending—particularly in an environment where the gap between economic “haves” and “have-nots” remains wide.

    Investment Implications

    For investors, this mixed backdrop argues for disciplined risk management. Markets may continue advancing on elevated earnings expectations, but those expectations can shift quickly as economic conditions evolve.

    • Scrutinize valuations. Rising indices do not preclude overpricing. Favor firms with strong balance sheets, reliable cash flows, and pricing power.
    • Diversify thoughtfully. Sector performance can diverge sharply. Defensive areas such as utilities, consumer staples, and healthcare often prove more resilient during sentiment-driven slowdowns.
    • Track leading indicators. Watch employment trends, consumer credit conditions, and forward-looking economic indices. Weak confidence can precede softer activity.
    • Maintain liquidity. Holding cash provides flexibility amid volatility created by divergence.
    • Consider hedging strategies. Exposure to bonds or volatility-linked instruments may help cushion downside risks.
    • Emphasize quality. Companies with durable competitive advantages are typically better positioned to navigate uncertainty.

    The split between hard data, market performance, and consumer mood represents a meaningful economic signal. While there are persuasive arguments that markets can continue climbing and that pullbacks should be bought, prudence requires acknowledging alternative outcomes.

    To borrow a well-known observation from Bob Farrell:

    Historically, when “all experts agree,” discipline and preparation for the unexpected have often proven wise.

    Sources: Lance Roberts

  • The Inflation Indicator Economists May Be Overlooking

    Inflation measurement sits at the core of modern macroeconomics. Interest-rate policy, asset valuations, fiscal planning, and central-bank credibility all hinge on how price pressures evolve. Yet the benchmark most policymakers rely on — the Consumer Price Index (CPI) — is a monthly government report designed for a far less digitized and fast-moving economy.

    Increasingly, market participants are supplementing that traditional gauge with real-time alternatives. Among them, Truflation has emerged as the most widely cited live inflation index. Built from millions of observed prices and updated continuously, it offers a near real-time snapshot of price dynamics. In early 2026, its signal diverges meaningfully from official CPI data.

    Methodology and Structural Differences

    Truflation was launched in December 2021 amid frustration over the lag in official inflation reporting. While CPI is released monthly and relies heavily on surveys, sampling, and statistical smoothing, Truflation applies a bottom-up, digitally native methodology.

    The index aggregates data from more than 30 million items across 30+ licensed providers — including online retailers, housing platforms, and consumer-data firms. Prices update daily and are secured through decentralized oracle infrastructure on the Chainlink network, increasing transparency and reducing the risk of retrospective revisions.

    Like CPI, Truflation tracks twelve broad consumption categories. However, its category weights are recalibrated annually using observed spending patterns rather than fixed survey-based assumptions. This allows the index to adjust more quickly to shifts in consumer behavior and pricing trends.

    Historically, that responsiveness has mattered. Empirical comparisons suggest Truflation has often led CPI turning points by roughly 40 to 75 days, flagging inflection points in inflation momentum well before they appear in official releases.

    Institutional Validation

    Skepticism toward alternative measures is natural. Still, Truflation has begun clearing some of the credibility hurdles required for broader institutional adoption.

    Throughout 2024 and 2025, its short-term forecasting accuracy was notable. In many instances, its readings anticipated CPI outcomes within approximately ±0.1 percentage points. That degree of precision has encouraged growing usage among macro hedge funds and systematic trading strategies.

    Institutional validation advanced further in early 2026 when Truflation was integrated into the Bloomberg L.P. terminal ecosystem — a quiet but meaningful step that elevated it from a crypto-native experiment into a recognized macro data input.

    Transparency also strengthens its appeal. Daily updates, publicly documented methodology, and auditability offer advantages in markets that reprice continuously, where a 30-day lag can materially affect positioning.

    The 2026 Divergence

    By mid-February 2026, the spread between Truflation and official CPI readings had widened to one of the largest gaps since the index was created:

    • Official CPI (January 2026): 2.4% year-over-year
    • Truflation (Feb 1–18, 2026): ~0.7%
    • Core CPI: ~2.5%
    • Truflation core proxy: ~1.3%

    Such a divergence presents a challenge: either real-time data are signaling a rapid disinflationary shift not yet captured by government statistics, or the high-frequency approach is temporarily underestimating sticky components embedded in CPI.

    If historical lead times hold, markets may need to reassess the inflation trajectory sooner rather than later.

    The widening gap between the two measures points to fundamentally different interpretations of current inflation momentum. The central source of divergence is housing.

    Truflation incorporates real-time asking rents pulled from active market platforms, capturing the recent cooling in rental prices as it happens. By contrast, official CPI relies heavily on “Owner’s Equivalent Rent,” a survey-based estimate that typically lags actual rental-market conditions by six to twelve months.

    In effect, the two gauges are measuring different time horizons. Truflation reflects present housing dynamics, while CPI still embeds rental trends from prior quarters.

    The macro implications are significant. If the real-time signal is more accurate, the U.S. economy could be moving closer to disinflation — or even deflationary — conditions, historically associated with rising recession risk. Meanwhile, official data continue to portray a controlled soft landing, with inflation appearing comfortably near target.

    Explaining the Reluctance

    Despite its growing track record, many economists remain hesitant to incorporate Truflation into formal macro frameworks. The resistance tends to rest on three main arguments.

    1. Institutional inertia.
    CPI has decades of embedded usage. Forecasting models, policy rules, asset-allocation frameworks, and academic research are all synchronized to its monthly release cycle. Integrating a daily inflation measure would require reworking not only projections, but established institutional workflows.

    2. Volatility bias.
    Because Truflation updates continuously, it can display sharp short-term swings. A rapid daily decline may be dismissed as noise, even when it reflects genuine pricing shifts. By comparison, CPI’s smoothed profile feels more stable — even if that stability comes at the expense of timeliness.

    3. Composition differences.
    Truflation assigns slightly less weight to housing than CPI. Critics argue this could understate inflation during periods of accelerating rents. Yet the reverse also holds true: when rental markets cool quickly, CPI may overstate underlying price pressure — which appears to be the present dynamic.

    Ultimately, the hesitation is less about data availability and more about comfort. A measure that moves faster and smooths less inevitably challenges established interpretive habits.

    Conclusion: Why the Signal Matters

    If Truflation’s current reading is directionally correct, monetary-policy expectations could be misaligned with underlying inflation trends. The Federal Reserve may have greater scope to ease than prevailing consensus assumes, even as headline data suggest economic resilience.

    This does not mean Truflation should replace CPI as the official benchmark. But when divergences persist and widen, dismissing the alternative becomes increasingly difficult.

    More broadly, the debate underscores a structural issue: inflation cannot be treated solely as a once-a-month statistic in an economy where prices adjust continuously. Measurement tools must evolve alongside market speed.

    Truflation’s importance does not rest on perfection. Its value lies in timeliness, transparency, and the growing challenge of ignoring what it is signaling.

    Sources: Charles-Henry Monchau

  • Nasdaq: Near-Term Tech Weakness Frequently Sets the Stage for Long-Term Gains

    NASDAQ Composite — and technology stocks more broadly — are like a finely tuned sports car. They can easily lap your grandmother’s Oldsmobile — the Dow Jones Industrial Average — but they also require more maintenance and can stall at inconvenient moments.

    Since its launch, and particularly since 2015, the NASDAQ has outperformed both the Dow and the S&P 500. Still, it’s very much a hare-and-tortoise story: the speedy rabbit occasionally takes long naps, yet ultimately wins the race — provided investors can tolerate the volatility that comes with tech-heavy exposure.

    That dynamic is playing out again in the current market rotation. Since November 1, 2025, the Dow has gained 4.34%, while the NASDAQ has slipped 3.54% — a near mirror image. Once again, capital has rotated out of high-flying tech names (the flashy sports car) and into the steadier reliability of the Dow’s blue-chip stalwarts.

    In April, Consumer Discretionary stocks tumbled during a tariff-driven selloff. Although they initially sank, they’ve since rebounded strongly. Betting against the U.S. consumer has historically been a mistake, especially when sentiment temporarily sours.

    Over the past year, Consumer Discretionary shares outpaced Consumer Staples, though a recent rotation has narrowed that gap.

    Yes, the NASDAQ can test your patience — even break your heart — but history suggests that endurance can pay off.

    Consider late 2021. While Federal Reserve officials were still describing inflation as “transitory,” markets began adjusting. On November 19, 2021, the NASDAQ reached an all-time high of 16,057. Over the next 13 months, it plunged 36.4%, closing at 10,213 on December 28, 2022. During that same stretch, the S&P 500 fell about 19%, and the Dow declined just 7.65%.

    Investors heavily concentrated in high-growth tech during 2022 likely felt significant pain. Yet those wounds healed quickly. From 2023 through 2025, the NASDAQ surged 122%, compared with a 78% gain for the S&P 500 and a more modest 45% rise for the Dow.

    Short-term breakdowns in tech can be dramatic — but historically, they have often laid the groundwork for powerful long-term outperformance.

    The Biggest NASDAQ Disaster – The Y2K Crash

    In 1999, the NASDAQ Composite was on a tear, doubling between June 1999 and March 2000, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average seemed half-asleep by comparison. That divergence flipped abruptly in March 2000. The Dow began climbing just as the NASDAQ collapsed, ultimately losing 50% or more in short order.

    In February 2000, the NASDAQ experienced a classic “melt-up” even as the Dow drifted lower. By mid-April, the opposite occurred: the NASDAQ suffered its worst week, plunging while the Dow actually advanced. From the start of 1999 through the end of February 2000, the NASDAQ had soared 122%, compared with gains of just 16% for the S&P 500 and 17% for the Dow. Then came the reversal. Between March and May, the blue-chip indexes gained about 4%, while the NASDAQ tumbled 28%. In a single week — April 11–15 — the NASDAQ dropped 25.3%, even as the Dow rose 3.4%.

    The aftermath was even more sobering. It took 16 years for the NASDAQ to reclaim its March 2000 peak. Meanwhile, the Dow and S&P 500 briefly reached new highs by 2007 and went on to establish lasting all-time highs by 2012. Over that 16-year span, the Dow climbed 48.6%, the S&P 500 gained 33.8%, and the NASDAQ was still slightly below its prior peak.

    Still, comparisons between 2026 and the dot-com era can be misleading. The 1999 boom was driven largely by speculative internet companies with little or no earnings. Today’s technology leaders, by contrast, generate substantial revenues and profits, with strong forward guidance tied to tangible business applications. This is a very different foundation.

    Over the long haul — since its launch 55 years ago — the NASDAQ has dramatically outperformed both the Dow and the S&P 500, often by multiples of two to four times. Since 1971, the NASDAQ has surged nearly 260-fold, rising from 89.61 to 23,242 at the start of 2026. Over the same period, the Dow has increased about 57-fold and the S&P 500 roughly 74-fold.

    So while volatility can test investors’ patience, history suggests resilience. Not every four-letter ticker deserves a four-letter rebuke.

    Sources: Louis Navellier

  • Global gas markets confront their most severe disruption since 2022 amid the conflict involving Iran.

    The global energy industry is preparing for its most serious upheaval since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. As tensions in Iran intensify, the Strait of Hormuz — the world’s most vital transit route for liquefied natural gas (LNG) — has effectively come to a standstill.

    Vessel-tracking data shows that at least 11 large LNG carriers have suspended their journeys. Major Japanese shipping firms, including Nippon Yusen K.K. (TYO:9101) and Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd (OTC:MSLOY), have reportedly instructed their ships to remain in safer waters. Iranian state media has characterized the passage as “virtually closed,” leaving roughly 20% of global LNG supply stranded behind what amounts to a naval blockade. Unlike oil, which can sometimes be diverted through pipelines, the immense volumes of Qatari gas moving through this narrow corridor have no viable alternative route.

    Asia’s exposure and price shock

    Asian nations are at the forefront of the fallout. Buyers in China, India, and Japan — the largest importers of Qatari gas — are said to be urgently seeking substitute cargoes from other suppliers. Yet in an already tight market, traders expect a sharp surge in spot LNG prices, potentially undoing a year of relative price stability within days.

    The strain extends beyond spot purchases. Many long-term LNG agreements are linked to crude benchmarks, so any spike in Brent Crude would quickly drive up costs even for contracted volumes, raising energy bills for households and industrial users alike.

    Supply risks and broader regional strain

    The disruption is also creating operational risks for producers. LNG export terminals depend on a continuous rotation of tankers to maintain cooling systems; without outbound shipments, producers in Qatar and the UAE could face partial or full production shutdowns.

    The ripple effects are spreading beyond the Gulf. With Israeli gas fields closed and Iranian pipeline exports to Turkey under pressure, countries such as Egypt are being pushed into the higher-cost seaborne LNG market.

    The result is a global scramble for the limited cargoes still available, setting the stage for an international bidding war. Whether the conflict widens or remains contained, the financial burden is likely to be passed on to consumers around the world.

    Sources: Simon Mugo

  • Bitcoin climbs back above $67,000 as traders respond to news of Khamenei’s death.

    Bitcoin (BitfinexUSD) is rebounding from its weekend slide, trading above the $67,000 mark as investors process a dramatic shift in Middle Eastern geopolitics.

    The bounce comes after intense volatility sparked by coordinated U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran. President Donald Trump stated that the operation led to the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Although Tehran initially rejected the reports, Iranian state media later confirmed his death, triggering sharp reactions across global financial markets.

    As highlighted in Saturday’s analysis, Bitcoin has a consistent pattern of sharply dropping on unexpected geopolitical shocks before stabilizing. That pattern appears to be unfolding again. After falling to nearly $63,000 yesterday, the cryptocurrency has gradually attracted renewed capital flows as the initial wave of panic selling eases.

    Ethereum and XRP are also participating in the broader recovery. ETH/USD has moved back toward the $2,000 level, while XRP is trading near $1.40, with investors anticipating a key March 1 deadline that could bring greater regulatory clarity in the United States.

    Regime change dynamics and shifting sentiment

    Khamenei’s death was a decisive and largely unforeseen development. The swift return of buyers into Bitcoin reflects a growing belief among traders that the most severe phase of military escalation may have already passed.

    At the same time, optimism is tempered by uncertainty surrounding the power vacuum in Tehran. As Iran’s highest authority for decades, Khamenei’s absence leaves open questions about the country’s leadership transition and broader regional stability.

    President Trump’s remarks encouraging Iranians to “reclaim their country” indicate that Washington may be aiming for structural regime change. For crypto investors, the coming days represent a critical period of observation. If Iran manages a controlled leadership transition without broadening the conflict, Bitcoin’s rebound could remain intact. However, a drawn-out internal or regional confrontation could quickly pressure the $67,000 support level once more.

    Escalation risks and Bitcoin’s “safe haven” debate

    Despite the recovery, the possibility of a wider regional conflict persists. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have reportedly carried out strikes against neighboring states hosting U.S. forces, and casualties have been reported following retaliatory action involving Israel. This ongoing cycle of retaliation continues to unsettle institutional crypto participants.

    The central issue now is whether Bitcoin can genuinely function as a “digital gold” hedge during geopolitical crises — or whether it will keep behaving like a high-beta technology asset that reacts sharply to shifts in global risk sentiment.

    Sources: Simon Mugo