The S&P 500 ended Wednesday down roughly 34 basis points. The index now appears to be forming a possible 2B reversal top after failing to sustain a breakout to new highs. Instead, it turned lower and finished the session back near support around 6,920.
If the index cannot clear the 6,950 level and subsequently falls below 6,920, it could open the door toward the 6,835 area. More broadly, the S&P 500 has shown little net progress since late October, and such a move would also threaten the uptrend established from the November 21 lows. As a result, the index looks more exposed to downside risks than it might initially suggest.
BTIC S&P 500 Total Return Futures (EFFR) for the December 2026 contracts declined again on Wednesday, reaching their lowest level since March 2024. While some may interpret this as bullish on the basis that financing costs are easing, it is difficult to identify periods when the S&P 500 advanced while these contracts were falling—at least based on my observations. To me, this is clearly bearish and suggests that demand for leverage is weakening or that positions are being unwound.
Implied volatility increased on Wednesday ahead of Friday’s employment report and upcoming Supreme Court opinions, which could include a ruling on tariffs. Kalshi currently assigns a 30% probability that the Court upholds the tariffs, implying a 70% likelihood that they are overturned.
I anticipate implied volatility will keep increasing as we approach this news event. The VIX 1-day is likely to rise significantly by Thursday afternoon and could continue climbing after the jobs report, given that the Supreme Court rulings are expected later that day. In my view, a VIX 1-day reading between 15 and 20 appears very probable.
The ISM service index suggests potential positive revisions for fourth-quarter GDP growth. On Wednesday, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported that its non-manufacturing service sector index increased to 54.4 in December from 52.6 in November, marking the third consecutive month of expansion and the fastest pace of growth in over a year.
The new orders sub-index rose sharply to 57.9 from 52.9, while business activity climbed to 56 from 54.5. Additionally, new export orders improved to 54.2, up from 48.7 in November. Out of 16 surveyed service industries, 11 showed expansion in December.
Conversely, the ISM manufacturing index fell to 47.9 in December from 48.2 the prior month, continuing its contractionary trend for the tenth straight month (a reading below 50 indicates contraction). Only 2 of 17 manufacturing industries—Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components, and Computer & Electronic Products—reported growth, likely supported by strong data center demand.
ADP’s December report showed private payrolls increasing by 41,000, missing economists’ expectation of 48,000. This follows a loss of 29,000 private jobs in November, meaning just 12,000 private jobs were created over the last two months. Manufacturing shed 5,000 jobs in December, while education and health services added 39,000, and leisure and hospitality gained 24,000 jobs. Regionally, the West lost 61,000 private sector jobs, while the South led with a gain of 54,000.
Residential investment acted as a 5.1% drag on GDP growth during the second and third quarters. Strengthening GDP going forward will depend largely on stabilizing the residential real estate market, which remains sluggish due to high mortgage rates, rising insurance costs, and an oversupply in several key areas. According to the Intercontinental Exchange, prices for U.S. condominiums dropped 1.9% in September and October, with high homeowners association (HOA) fees and insurance expenses cited as major factors. In nine major metropolitan regions, over 25% of condominiums have fallen below their original sale prices. While multiple Federal Reserve rate cuts could help support home prices, the current weakness is fueling deflationary concerns that the Fed needs to address.
If deflation emerges from (1) weak housing and rental prices, (2) low crude oil prices, and (3) deflation imported from China and other struggling global economies, the Fed may need to implement rapid interest rate cuts totaling around 100 basis points. With President Trump expected to nominate a new Fed Chair soon, current Chair Jerome Powell is likely to become a lame duck. Minutes from the December Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting indicated at least one more 0.25% rate cut is probable, but any further deflationary signals could prompt the Fed to enact much larger reductions in key rates in the coming months.
President Trump is expected to nominate a new Federal Reserve Chair in January who will likely reverse the Fed’s current restrictive policies and adopt a more pro-business stance. Should Kevin Hassett, the current Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, be appointed, the Fed would gain a strong economic advocate, a development that many find promising and exciting.
U.S. stock index futures were mostly flat on Wednesday evening, after Wall Street’s major benchmarks ended the session broadly lower from record highs, as investors looked ahead to key U.S. employment data due later this week.
S&P 500 futures edged up 0.1% to 6,967.0, while Nasdaq 100 futures were little changed at 25,837.25 by 20:03 ET (01:03 GMT). Dow Jones futures also added 0.1% to 49,263.0.
Wall Street Pulls Back From Record Highs Ahead of U.S. Jobs Data
During the session, the S&P 500 declined 0.3%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.9%. In contrast, the Nasdaq Composite added 0.2%, supported by selective gains among large-cap technology stocks that helped offset broader market weakness.
Both the S&P 500 and the Dow had reached record highs in the previous session, and the mixed performance pointed to some profit-taking after the recent rally.
Figures from payroll processor ADP showed that private-sector job growth in December came in below expectations, signaling a slowdown in hiring momentum toward year-end.
Although the ADP report is often seen as volatile and not always a reliable guide to official government data, it added to evidence that the labor market may be gradually cooling.
Focus now shifts to Friday’s highly anticipated nonfarm payrolls report, which is expected to offer clearer insight into employment trends and wage growth. The data will be closely watched by markets evaluating the probability and timing of potential Federal Reserve rate cuts in the months ahead. Weaker-than-expected job growth could reinforce expectations that the Fed may begin easing policy earlier in 2026.
Attention on rising tensions between the US and Venezuela
Geopolitical strains continued to run high after U.S. forces apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, yet financial markets have so far exhibited only limited, short‑lived reactions to the dramatic turn of events. Investors appear to be largely unfazed by the heightened political risk, although the episode has introduced fresh uncertainty into the outlook for energy markets. U.S. President Donald Trump stated that Venezuela’s interim leadership would transfer up to 50 million barrels of crude oil to the United States.
After months of rising tensions, the United States launched a major military operation in Venezuela on 3 January 2026, resulting in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed the operation, saying Washington would administer Venezuela until a stable transition government could be established. This marks one of the most dramatic U.S. interventions in Latin America in decades, with Maduro removed from power and taken into U.S. custody.
Maduro, long a focal point of U.S. sanctions and foreign policy pressure, was transported to the United States to face federal charges—such as narco‑terrorism and drug trafficking—filed in the Southern District of New York.
Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves, and the sudden change in leadership carries significant geopolitical and economic implications well beyond its borders.
Why Did the US Capture Maduro?
Nicolás Maduro rose through the Venezuelan political system under socialist leader Hugo Chávez and became president in 2013. His time in power was widely criticized domestically and internationally, with opponents accusing him of suppressing dissent, restricting freedoms, and holding elections that lacked credibility.
Relations with Washington deteriorated sharply, especially under the Trump administration. U.S. officials accused Maduro’s government of involvement in drug trafficking and creating conditions that fueled migration toward the United States. They also branded elements of his regime—including the Cartel of the Suns—as a terrorist organization.
Tensions escalated in 2025 when the U.S. increased the bounty for Maduro’s arrest to $50 million and expanded military pressure in the region, including strikes on vessels the U.S. claimed were tied to drug smuggling.
On 3 January 2026, after months of military buildup and diplomatic pressure, U.S. forces launched a major operation in Venezuela—code‑named Operation Absolute Resolve—that resulted in the capture of Maduro and his wife. The U.S. government framed the intervention as a law‑enforcement action tied to longstanding criminal charges against Maduro, including narcoterrorism.
The United States claims that Venezuelan officials were engaged in government‑backed drug trafficking, asserting links with the so‑called Cartel of the Suns, which Washington has designated as a terrorist organization—a claim Maduro vehemently rejects. He argues that U.S. actions were aimed at forcing regime change and securing control over Venezuela’s vast oil riches.
Only hours before his detention, Maduro made his final public appearance as president when he hosted China’s special envoy, Qiu Xiaoqi, at the Miraflores Palace to discuss bilateral relations—an event that highlighted Caracas’s reliance on foreign partnerships for political support. Shortly after that meeting, explosions were reported across Caracas.
The event went beyond a simple arrest; it sent a broader strategic message, particularly to countries like China and Iran, undermining the belief that the U.S. would refrain from acting against governments supported by foreign adversaries.
Drill, Baby, Drill
A major strategic factor behind U.S. actions in Venezuela appears to be securing access to its vast energy resources. Venezuela sits on the largest proven oil reserves on the planet, with estimates from Wood Mackenzie suggesting roughly 241 billion barrels of recoverable crude, making it a uniquely significant player in global oil markets.
Top Countries by Proven Oil Reserves (Billion Barrels)
However, Venezuela’s track record of oil output underscores just how challenging it has been to tap into its vast reserves. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the nation was capable of producing close to 3 million barrels per day—a level that made it one of the world’s top crude exporters. But political turmoil, labor strikes, and the restructuring of the oil sector under Hugo Chávez triggered a prolonged decline. The downturn was steepened further by U.S. sanctions starting in 2017, which restricted investment, technology, and exports, driving production down sharply. After bottoming out around 374,000–500,000 bpd during the worst of the crisis, output has only modestly recovered in recent years and remains in the range of approximately 800,000–900,000 bpd.
Historical Total Venezuelan Supply
Expectations that Venezuelan oil output could quickly rebound may overstate what’s realistically achievable. History shows that even after major disruptions, rebuilding oil production takes many years and vast investment. For example, Iraq needed almost a decade and well over $200 billion in capital to restore its output after the Iraq War, while Libya still has not returned to its pre‑2011 production levels.
Venezuela’s challenges are even more severe. Most of its reserves are extra‑heavy crude that demands upgrading and blending with diluents before it can be transported and refined, a costly and technical process. Years of underinvestment, international sanctions, the erosion of PDVSA’s workforce, and the deterioration of infrastructure have compounded these production hurdles. Pipelines, upgraders, and refineries have been left in poor condition, and limited access to modern technology continues to restrict any rapid recovery.
While PDVSA has claimed that facilities were not physically damaged in recent events—suggesting limited short‑term disruption—oil markets appear capable of absorbing this uncertainty for now. Inventories remain ample, and OPEC+ has signalled that its voluntary cuts of around 1.65 million bpd could be reversed if necessary to balance markets.
In a scenario where a pro‑U.S. government enables sanctions relief and attracts foreign investment, Venezuelan exports could gradually recover. But bringing production back to around 3 million bpd would take many years and substantial infrastructure upgrades. U.S. leadership has indicated that American oil companies would play a role in operating and developing Venezuela’s oil sector, though analysts note that the heavy crude’s technical challenges and investment risks remain significant.
Meanwhile, global oil markets are structurally tightening, with world consumption exceeding 101 million bpd driven by demand growth in the U.S., China, and India. Any short‑term impact on supply may show up as a modest increase in geopolitical risk premiums, but over time, the sidelined Venezuelan barrels—currently producing around 800,000–900,000 bpd—could eventually add supply and influence prices if output scales up gradually.
In addition to oil, Venezuela sits on a wealth of mineral resources. Large deposits of iron ore, bauxite, gold, nickel, copper, zinc and other metallic minerals are concentrated mainly in the southern Guayana Shield region. The country also ranks among Latin America’s largest holders of gold, and geological assessments identify significant iron and bauxite resources alongside reserves of coal, antimony, molybdenum and other base metals.
Despite this geological potential, commercial mining activity remains very limited. Most non‑oil mineral sectors contribute only a tiny fraction of Venezuela’s economic output, and substantial foreign investment has largely been absent, meaning much of the nation’s mineral wealth has yet to be developed into large‑scale production.
The Ongoing Economic Battle Between the United States and China
Competition between modern empires today is no longer about direct confrontation but about control over key inputs. Energy, metals, and critical materials form the foundation of the modern world. When leaders signal a willingness to secure these resources directly, markets should interpret this not as mere rhetoric, but as a concrete resource strategy.
The rivalry between the United States and China is fundamentally structural rather than ideological. The U.S. is rich in energy but dependent on imported metals and rare earths. China dominates metals processing but imports around 70% of its crude oil. Each side is strong where the other is vulnerable, and both seek to turn this imbalance into strategic advantage.
Control over energy flows also carries monetary implications. Influence over Venezuelan oil is not only about supply, but also about reinforcing the petrodollar and preventing the rise of the petroyuan.
There is also a regional dimension to this rivalry. China has steadily increased its presence in Latin America through infrastructure projects and commodity-backed financing. Recent U.S. moves indicate an effort to reassert dominance in the Western Hemisphere, compelling Beijing to compete on less advantageous terms. The Trump administration’s 2025 National Security Strategy elevated the region to a core priority, effectively reviving the logic of the Monroe Doctrine—rebranded as the “Donroe Doctrine.” The aim is to bring strategically important natural resources, especially critical minerals and rare earths, under U.S.-aligned corporate control while building a hemisphere-wide supply chain that reduces dependence on China.
Across much of South America, governments are edging closer to Washington, leaving Brazil increasingly isolated. This is significant given President Lula’s openly left-leaning stance and his consistent alignment with Russia, China, and Iran. Following Trump’s capture of Maduro, betting markets on Kalshi assign a 90% probability that the presidents of Colombia and Peru will be out of office before 2027. At the same time, President Trump has again stated that Greenland should become part of the United States, reinforcing a broader strategy centered on securing critical assets.
Which Assets Could Gain from “Nation Building” in Venezuela?
A political transition in Venezuela would most directly benefit assets tied to sovereign debt restructuring, energy infrastructure, and the oil supply chain.
Venezuelan bonds are currently priced at roughly 25–35 cents on the dollar, reflecting the impact of sanctions and ongoing legal uncertainty. Under a regime-change scenario, several analysts project potential recoveries in the 30–55 cent range, supported by the prospects of debt restructuring and the easing or removal of sanctions.
Ashmore continues to rank among the largest institutional holders of Venezuelan sovereign debt. Advisory firms such as Houlihan Lokey—financial adviser to the Venezuela Creditor Committee—and Lazard, a veteran of major sovereign restructurings (including Greece and Ukraine), would likely stand to gain from the sheer scale and complexity of any debt workout. In such processes, advisers typically earn success-based fees and function as the “picks and shovels” of restructuring. Venezuela’s debt structure is widely regarded as one of the most intricate ever assembled.
Reviving Venezuela’s oil industry would demand swift rehabilitation of aging infrastructure. Technip, which historically designed much of the country’s core oil facilities, is well placed to play a leading role given its proprietary expertise—particularly if emergency repairs are fast-tracked through sole-source or no-bid contracts. Graham Corporation, a supplier of vacuum ejector systems used in heavy-oil upgrading and refining, could also benefit, since Venezuela’s crude requires vacuum distillation to prevent it from solidifying into coke.
Before exports can meaningfully increase, Venezuela will need to import substantial volumes of diluent (such as naphtha or natural gasoline) to transport its heavy crude through pipelines. Targa Resources, operator of the Galena Park Marine Terminal in Houston—a major LPG and naphtha export hub—would be a natural beneficiary if Venezuela pivots back to U.S. diluent supplies, replacing current inflows from Iran.
The clearest corporate beneficiary of regime change and nation-building in Venezuela is Chevron (NYSE: CVX). Unlike other U.S. energy majors that exited the country, Chevron has maintained an on-the-ground presence. It retains the workforce, regulatory approvals (through OFAC), and operational assets—most notably Petroboscan and Petropiar—that position it to scale up production quickly. Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP), both of which hold legacy claims and arbitration awards stemming from past expropriations, could also regain market access or pursue compensation under a revised legal and political framework.
Refiners along the U.S. Gulf Coast—such as Valero Energy (NYSE: VLO), Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX), and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE: MPC)—were purpose-built to handle heavy, sour crude like that produced in Venezuela. Since the imposition of sanctions, these companies have had to rely on costlier substitute feedstocks. A resumption of Venezuelan supply would reduce input costs and support refining margins, assuming end-product demand remains stable.
At the sector level, a significant increase in Venezuelan output would likely weigh on oil prices, which would be negative for crude producers but positive for consumer-oriented equities. Lower energy prices are inherently deflationary and could translate into lower bond yields—conditions that are generally supportive of risk assets, all else equal.
Note: This section is for analytical purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Venezuela: What Comes Next for the Economy and Markets?
In a characteristically Trump-like approach, President Trump initially stated that the United States would “administer” Venezuela during the transition period. U.S. officials later confirmed that approximately 15,000 troops would remain stationed in the Caribbean, with the option of further intervention if the interim authorities in Caracas failed to comply with Washington’s demands.
Venezuela’s Supreme Court subsequently named Vice President Delcy Rodríguez as interim president. A close ally of Maduro since 2018, Rodríguez previously oversaw much of the oil-dependent economy and the country’s intelligence structures, placing her firmly within the existing power framework. She signaled a willingness “to cooperate” with the Trump administration, hinting at a potentially dramatic reset in relations between the two long-hostile governments.
International observers, including the United Nations and the Carter Center, have concluded that Venezuela’s 2024 elections lacked legitimacy and fell short of international standards. Independently verified tally sheets reviewed by analysts indicated that opposition candidate Edmundo González secured around 67% of the vote, compared with roughly 30% for Maduro.
At the same time, María Corina Machado—Nobel Peace Prize laureate and a leading figure in Venezuela’s opposition—is expected to return to the country later this month and has said the opposition is ready to take power. President Trump, however, has publicly cast doubt on the breadth of her support among the Venezuelan population.
In this context, three potential scenarios appear likely, as outlined by Gavekal Research:
“Soft” Military Rule
In the near term, the most probable outcome is the continuation of the current power structure under Rodríguez and the armed forces. For this arrangement to endure, it would likely require a pragmatic shift toward U.S. priorities—embracing a more business-friendly approach and loosening ties with traditional partners such as Russia, China, and Iran. Washington may be willing to accept this scenario if it ensures political stability and reliable access to energy supplies.
Democratic Transition
A negotiated move toward civilian governance would hinge largely on how new elections are structured. Allowing participation from the Venezuelan diaspora could significantly reshape the results, whereas restricting voting to residents inside the country would be more likely to benefit factions linked to the existing regime.
“Libya Redux” (State Breakdown)
The most destabilizing scenario would involve the collapse of central authority, triggering internal military conflict and the proliferation of armed groups. Such an outcome would heighten the risk of civil strife, renewed migration pressures, and severe disruptions to oil production and global energy markets.
After a sharp decline, three insiders stepped in to buy shares of U.S. apparel giant Nike.
On December 19, 2025, Nike experienced its steepest drop in some time, with shares tumbling 10.5% following the release of its latest earnings report. The results were mixed—highlighted by strong growth in running products but disappointing performance in China. Despite some positives, the market’s reaction indicated a notable decrease in investor confidence regarding Nike’s recovery prospects.
In this article, we examine the recent insider purchases, including buys from Nike’s CEO Elliott Hill and Apple CEO Tim Cook. Their actions suggest a bullish outlook on the stock, signaling a potential opportunity. But should investors follow their lead or approach Nike stock with caution?
Nike gains $3.5 million buy-in from independent directors, boosting investor confidence
Following Nike’s earnings report, the stock fell sharply below $60 per share— a level not seen since May 2025. On December 22, Tim Cook made a notable move, purchasing approximately $2.95 million worth of Nike shares at an average price near $59 each. Cook has been closely involved with Nike for many years.
He joined Nike’s Board of Directors in 2005 and currently serves as the Lead Independent Director. While independent directors are not company employees nor have other business ties beyond their board roles, they provide crucial oversight by advising management and balancing executive power.
As Lead Independent Director, Cook plays a key role in holding Nike’s management accountable and assessing their performance to ensure they act in shareholders’ best interests.
Notably, independent director Robert Swan also bought $500,000 worth of Nike shares on December 22, 2025. The purchases by Cook and Swan demonstrate that Nike’s independent directors remain confident in the company’s future direction.
Nike insiders Hill, Cook, and Swan signal confidence through recent share buys
These two purchases become even more significant when viewed alongside a recent insider buy by Nike CEO Elliott Hill. On December 29, 2025, Hill acquired just over $1 million worth of shares at an average price of approximately $61.
While Hill’s purchase alone is a bullish indicator, the combined activity of these three insiders strengthens the overall positive outlook. It indicates that both Nike’s management and its independent directors share confidence in the stock’s potential recovery.
Typically, management and independent directors serve as checks and balances to each other, so this consensus is a promising sign. It suggests that Hill’s optimism is supported by those tasked with scrutinizing his strategies. However, there remains the possibility that these insider buys were aimed at bolstering investor sentiment, making it somewhat challenging to gauge their true conviction.
Following a dip to just above $57 on December 22, 2025, Nike’s shares have surged nearly 13% to around $64.50. The stock climbed more than 4% on two occasions, largely driven by the impact of these insider purchases.
Limited short-term upside seen by analysts, with strong long-term growth prospects
Despite the optimism shown by Hill, Cook, and Swan, market consensus remains uncertain. The average price target for Nike stands just below $76, suggesting about an 18% potential gain.
However, MarketBeat’s data reveals that over 15 analysts lowered their price targets following Nike’s December 18, 2025 earnings report. The revised average target is around $69, indicating a more modest upside of approximately 7%.
For Nike to succeed moving forward, increasing sales growth while minimizing discounting is critical. Achieving this would boost profit margins and help reverse the recent decline in free cash flow.
Though progress in this area has been limited so far, Nike’s strong brand recognition offers significant leverage to improve these metrics. Currently, shares trade about 47% above their 10-year low but would need to climb roughly 158% to match their 10-year high.
While the long-term outlook appears generally positive, the possibility of short-term declines persists as long as investors remain unconvinced by Nike’s progress.
Australian CPI inflation slowed more than expected in November as electricity prices eased, though core inflation remained sticky and above the Reserve Bank of Australia’s target band. Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics released Wednesday showed annual CPI rising 3.4%, below forecasts of 3.6% and down from 3.8% in October.
The slowdown in inflation was mainly driven by electricity prices rising at a softer pace than in the previous month, while housing, food, and transport costs continued to climb. Core inflation remained persistent, with the trimmed mean CPI at 3.2% in November, easing slightly from 3.3% in October but still above the RBA’s 2%–3% target range. Goods inflation cooled to 3.3% from 3.8%, largely due to slower electricity price growth, while services inflation also eased to 3.6% from 3.9%, mainly reflecting seasonal factors. The ABS said Black Friday had minimal impact on prices. Although headline CPI softened, it remains uncertain whether the decline is enough to shift the RBA’s hawkish outlook, as the central bank paused its rate-cut cycle in late 2025 and signaled rates will stay unchanged amid stubborn inflation.
ANZ analysts said the November CPI figures suggest the RBA is likely to keep rates unchanged in February, while potentially debating a rate hike later in the year. They added that inflation pressures are expected to ease as 2026 progresses, with the cash rate forecast to remain at 3.60% over their outlook period. Meanwhile, Australian inflation unexpectedly accelerated in late 2025, driven by higher housing and food costs, while the gradual removal of Canberra’s electricity subsidies also pushed prices higher.
Gold and silver prices rose as investors sought safe-haven metals amid heightened geopolitical tensions following the U.S. capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
The capture of Venezuela’s President Maduro has raised concerns about how quickly the country can increase oil production, with analysts skeptical about major oil companies committing new investments amid the ongoing uncertainty.
Crude oil prices fluctuated as traders weighed the impact of Maduro’s capture on global supply and Venezuela’s energy sector. Brent crude dropped up to 1.2% before bouncing back near $61 per barrel, while WTI stayed above $57. Despite the instability, Venezuela remains a relatively small supplier in an already oversupplied market.
U.S. airlines are resuming Caribbean routes after a U.S. military operation in Venezuela caused regional airspace closures, which stranded thousands of travelers. Airlines like American and Delta responded by adding extra flights and larger planes, with American alone providing nearly 5,000 additional seats.
Upcoming jobs data, particularly the January 9 report, is set to influence markets. Labor market softness prompted the Fed to cut rates in its last three meetings in 2025, supporting stocks, but the potential for further rate cuts in 2026 remains uncertain.
The S&P 500 slipped toward the end of the year but still posted a strong 16% gain for 2025. January promises to be busy, with Q4 earnings and crucial inflation figures scheduled for release.
Dow Jones futures dipped slightly Sunday night, while S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures edged up. Over the weekend, former President Donald Trump claimed that the U.S. would “run” Venezuela following the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, though Maduro’s government remains intact.
The annual CES technology conference officially begins Tuesday in Las Vegas, with artificial intelligence expected to take center stage. CES 2026 will showcase major presentations from AI chip leaders Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD), highlighting AI’s tangible applications across devices—from smart glasses and wearable life-loggers to robotaxis and humanoid robots.
Industrial technology will also receive attention, with keynote speeches from the CEOs of Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT) and Siemens (SIEGY). The four-day event will run through Friday.
Nvidia, AMD, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) will be key players at CES 2026 in Las Vegas.
$NVDA – Jensen Huang’s keynote: January 5 at 4:00 PM ET
$AMD – Lisa Su’s keynote: January 5 at 9:30 PM ET
$MRVL – Matt Murphy’s fireside chat: January 6 at 12:00 PM ET
$TSM – Monthly sales data release: January 9
Stocks dropped in the final trading session of 2025, causing the S&P 500 to register a loss for December. However, the index still posted a strong gain of over 16% for the year, marking its third consecutive year with double-digit growth, while the VIX remained near yearly lows.
After a quiet year-end, 2026 is expected to start actively with important economic reports, a Supreme Court decision on President Trump’s tariffs, his nominee for the next Federal Reserve chair, and the beginning of earnings season. Although next week’s earnings calendar is relatively light, a few companies such as AAR (NYSE: AIR), Commercial Metals (NYSE: CMC), and Acuity (NYSE: AYI) are scheduled to report.
US Economic Data
A series of key economic reports will be released during the first full week of January. Scheduled releases include the ISM manufacturing and services indexes, Commerce Department data on housing starts and building permits, and the Labor Department’s JOLTS report. The highlight will be Friday’s release of December payrolls.
On December 30, the Chicago Fed reported that its labor market model indicated only minor shifts in layoffs, quits, and hiring of unemployed workers for the month, projecting the unemployment rate to remain steady at 4.56%.
The tech boom and onshoring efforts are set to trigger a significant surge in capital spending. The majority of this investment is expected from the “Big Four” tech giants—Microsoft, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL), and Meta (NASDAQ: META)—all of which have indicated their 2026 capital expenditures will likely surpass those of 2025.
The “Magnificent 7” — which includes Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), Nvidia, and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) — are projected to collectively invest over $500 billion in capital expenditures in 2026. Although not officially committed to this amount, their guidance in late 2025 suggests an acceleration of substantial AI infrastructure spending in the coming year.
Onshoring also plays a crucial role in driving capital investment, as the Trump administration’s tariff team has secured commitments from foreign governments and companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the U.S. in return for reduced tariff rates.
Technical Analysis
DJIA Index
The DJIA continues to trade within an upward channel that began from the lows in August 2025. On Friday, December 26, 2025, the index was unable to move above the channel’s midpoint. Support is found near the lower boundary of the channel, around 47,900. A decisive move either above or below this 47,900 level will likely determine the next direction for the index.
Nasdaq 100 Index
The NDX continues to face resistance in the 25,870–25,900 range. As long as this resistance holds, the index is expected to trade within a range between 25,900 and 24,645. A clear break below the 25,000 level could pave the way for a decline toward 24,645.
SPX Index
Last week, the SPX fell below the 6,896 resistance zone. As long as it remains under this level, a decline toward 6,820 seems probable. A strong and sustained break below 6,820 would suggest further downside potential toward the 6,740–6,720 range. Otherwise, the SPX is likely to trade sideways within the 6,890 to 6,820 range.
Weekly US Indices Probability Map
The U.S. weekly market probability map for January 5–9, 2026 indicates a week characterized by mixed trading patterns. These maps are based on historical seasonality trends, with sentiment readings generated using a seasonality-driven scoring system.
This week’s highlights include the U.S. jobs report, ISM PMI surveys, and the CES Conference.
AMD is a recommended buy, driven by expected AI innovations presented in CEO Lisa Su’s CES keynote.
Cal-Maine Foods is a sell candidate ahead of a potentially disappointing earnings report and a weak outlook.
Wall Street’s major indexes closed mostly higher on Friday, the first trading day of 2026, boosted by gains in semiconductor and AI-related stocks. However, all three indexes still recorded slight declines for the week.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.7%, the S&P 500 dropped 1%, the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite fell 1.5%, and the small-cap Russell 2000 declined 1%.
The first full trading week of 2026 promises to be busy, with monthly jobs data taking center stage. Economists forecast nonfarm job growth of 54,000 for January, down from 67,000 in December, while the unemployment rate is expected to decrease to 4.5% from 4.6%. Additionally, the ISM manufacturing and services PMIs will be closely monitored by investors.
On the earnings front, only a few companies are scheduled to report this week, including Constellation Brands, Cal-Maine Foods, Jefferies Financial Group, Albertsons, and Applied Digital.
Meanwhile, investors in the tech and consumer sectors will be closely watching the CES conference in Las Vegas. Key companies to watch for product launches, strategic updates, and AI developments include Nvidia, AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, Meta Platforms, Samsung, LG, Sony, and Motorola.
No matter how the market moves, below I highlight one stock expected to gain interest and another that may face further declines. Keep in mind, my outlook is limited to the upcoming week, Monday, January 5 through Friday, January 9.
Stock to Buy: Advanced Micro Devices
AMD stands out as a strong buy this week, with the 2026 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) acting as a key catalyst. The highlight will be CEO Dr. Lisa Su’s opening keynote on Monday at 6:30 PM PT (9:30 PM ET).
Su is expected to present AMD’s vision for AI solutions across cloud, enterprise, edge, and devices, potentially unveiling new advancements in AI chips and related technologies. Historically, AMD shares tend to rally during the week of its major product announcements, often followed by multiple analyst upgrades.
Analysts remain optimistic, with a consensus Strong Buy rating supported by 40 Buy and 11 Hold recommendations, suggesting a 26.5% upside potential for 2026. TD Cowen recently named AMD among its top AI picks, setting a price target of $290.
Fundamentally, AMD’s growth is driven by its AI product portfolio, including the MI300 series accelerators, which are gaining ground against rivals like Nvidia.
AMD shares closed Friday at $223.47. From a technical standpoint, the stock has demonstrated resilience, recovering from mid-2025 lows near $150 to its current level, supported by strong trading volume. If the upcoming keynote meets expectations with announcements like new partnerships or product roadmaps, AMD could soon challenge its 52-week high around $270.
AMD holds a Financial Health Score of 2.98 (“GOOD”), indicating a solid balance sheet and strong operating momentum driven by excitement around its next-generation AI products.
Stock to Sell: Cal-Maine Foods
Cal-Maine Foods starts the week at $78.47, hovering near its 52-week low, as Wall Street anticipates a weak earnings report and a bleak outlook. The company faces headwinds including rising feed costs, supply chain challenges, and variable demand.
The largest U.S. producer and distributor of shell eggs is set to release its fiscal second-quarter results before the market opens on Wednesday at 6:00 AM ET, followed by a conference call at 9:00 AM ET.
Cal-Maine is projected to report earnings of $2.08 per share, a sharp 53.5% decline from $4.47 a year ago, driven by higher input costs and fluctuating demand. Revenue is expected to drop 14.7% year-over-year to $814.2 million, amid ongoing egg price volatility and potential disruptions from recent avian flu outbreaks that have affected supply chains.
Looking forward, the company’s guidance is likely to reflect continued uncertainty around production normalization and cost control, posing further challenges for investor confidence and stock performance.
Technically, CALM has slipped below key support levels, accompanied by declining volume that indicates weakening investor interest. Its one-year target price of $95.50 offers limited upside, but the risks from a disappointing earnings report outweigh potential gains.
With the likelihood of underwhelming results and cautious guidance, CALM is a sell this week to avoid volatility driven by these events.
Whether you’re a beginner investor or an experienced trader, using InvestingPro can help you uncover investment opportunities while managing risks in this challenging market environment.
Shares of auto giant Tesla Inc. closed lower for the fourth consecutive session on December 29, signaling a notable shift in momentum just days after the stock reached a fresh all-time high. Since that peak just before Christmas, Tesla shares have declined nearly 8%, marking a sharp reversal after a hard-fought rally.
The timing of Tesla’s recent pullback makes it particularly notable. In a market hovering near record highs, Tesla’s sudden loss of momentum just as it enters blue sky territory raises a critical question: is this a healthy pause or an early sign that the rally is losing steam?
Let’s explore the arguments on both sides.
A Pullback Was Always Possible Amid Tesla’s Rapid Rally
Tesla has surged more than 100% since April, with its longer-term uptrend remaining firmly intact. Even after the recent decline, the stock has not broken any major trend structures—it simply looks more pronounced coming off a record high. Many investors had anticipated the rally to accelerate after Tesla finally cleared long-term resistance, rather than pull back.
From a technical perspective, a pullback of this magnitude is normal and consistent with previous corrections the stock has experienced this year. The latest rally phase was largely one-directional, making profit-taking after major milestones expected.
Tesla’s shares could fall another 8% and still remain within the rising trend channel that has supported the stock since spring. Viewed this way, the recent selloff represents a period of digestion rather than a breakdown. Healthy uptrends rarely move in straight lines—something Tesla investors are all too familiar with.
This outlook is further supported by Tradesmith’s Health Indicator, a volatility-based measure of stock price strength. According to this indicator, Tesla (TSLA) stock has remained in the green zone for four consecutive months, signaling a healthy underlying trend despite recent pullbacks.
A Change in Tone Marks Shift in Market Sentiment Around Tesla Stock
While a pullback is normal after reaching an all-time high, four consecutive lower closes suggest there is more at play than just short-term profit-taking. The sustained selling pressure indicates that bears have firmly taken control from the bulls, with little defense visible so far.
The critical question now is whether buyers will quickly re-enter the market. If they do, this pullback may be seen as a buying opportunity for long-term investors. If not, the market could begin to reassess the remaining upside potential ahead of the next major catalyst—January’s earnings report.
Analyst Support Remains Strong as Tesla Navigates Recent Price Decline
Despite recent weakness, analyst conviction in Tesla remains firm. Over the past week, both RBC and Canaccord Genuity reaffirmed their Buy ratings on the stock. Canaccord Genuity even raised its price target to $551, implying roughly 20% upside from current levels.
These positive calls suggest that the recent selloff is a minor pullback within a larger, ongoing uptrend that still has significant room to grow, even if near-term price action appears uncomfortable. While Sell ratings, such as one from UBS Group last week, persist, they remain rare exceptions in an otherwise solid analyst consensus.
This broader trend of sustained analyst support is particularly important during periods of market uncertainty like the current one.
Why the Next Few Trading Sessions Are Crucial for Tesla Stock
Despite the ongoing pullback, it would be a mistake to dismiss the recent price action entirely. Runs of consecutive red days like this are rare for Tesla, especially so soon after hitting new highs. The fact that this is occurring while the broader market remains strong adds an extra layer of concern.
Tesla’s high valuation intensifies this tension. Trading with a price-to-earnings ratio above 300, the stock leaves little margin for error. Any sign of disappointment in the company’s upcoming earnings report at the end of January could lead to a swift selloff. Confidence, not just momentum, is now a crucial factor.
This makes the upcoming sessions particularly important. How Tesla performs through the remainder of the holiday week and into early January will provide vital clues about the health of the rally. Stabilization or a quick rebound would suggest the pullback is routine. Continued weakness, however, would encourage bearish sentiment and shift the narrative from consolidation to growing doubt.
THE ETERNAL SOVEREIGN 